Read MPS format model from file tsp.mps
Reading time = 0.00 seconds
tsp.cmpl: 92 rows, 109 columns, 416 nonzeros
Optimize a model with 92 rows, 109 columns and 416 nonzeros
Presolve time: 0.00s
Presolved: 92 rows, 109 columns, 416 nonzeros
Variable types: 9 continuous, 100 integer (100 binary)
Found heuristic solution: objective 80207.891276

Root relaxation: objective 2.720293e+02, 31 iterations, 0.00 seconds

    Nodes    |    Current Node    |     Objective Bounds      |     Work
 Expl Unexpl |  Obj  Depth IntInf | Incumbent    BestBd   Gap | It/Node Time

     0     0  272.02931    0   18 80207.8913  272.02931   100%     -    0s
     0     0  300.46422    0   16 80207.8913  300.46422   100%     -    0s
     0     0  300.46422    0   16 80207.8913  300.46422   100%     -    0s
*   29     0              21     481.6885330  304.08554  36.9%   5.5    0s
H   48    23                     467.8651610  305.48318  34.7%   5.1    0s
H   63    22                     417.3276670  305.48318  26.8%   4.8    0s
*   86    19              13     370.3807970  305.48318  17.5%   4.5    0s
*  245    42              14     353.8013960  309.39770  12.6%   4.3    0s
*  267     8               9     321.3192110  309.39770  3.71%   4.4    0s

Cutting planes:
  Learned: 2
  Gomory: 1
  MIR: 2

Explored 443 nodes (1871 simplex iterations) in 0.11 seconds
Thread count was 2 (of 2 available processors)

Optimal solution found (tolerance 1.00e-04)
Best objective 3.213192110000e+02, best bound 3.213192110000e+02, gap 0.0%
Read MPS format model from file tsp.mps
Reading time = 0.00 seconds
tsp.cmpl: 92 rows, 109 columns, 416 nonzeros
Optimize a model with 92 rows, 109 columns and 416 nonzeros
Presolve time: 0.00s
Presolved: 92 rows, 109 columns, 416 nonzeros
Variable types: 9 continuous, 100 integer (100 binary)
Found heuristic solution: objective 80207.891276

Root relaxation: objective 2.720293e+02, 31 iterations, 0.00 seconds

    Nodes    |    Current Node    |     Objective Bounds      |     Work
 Expl Unexpl |  Obj  Depth IntInf | Incumbent    BestBd   Gap | It/Node Time

     0     0  272.02931    0   18 80207.8913  272.02931   100%     -    0s
     0     0  300.46422    0   16 80207.8913  300.46422   100%     -    0s
     0     0  300.46422    0   16 80207.8913  300.46422   100%     -    0s
*   29     0              21     481.6885330  304.08554  36.9%   5.5    0s
H   48    23                     467.8651610  305.48318  34.7%   5.1    0s
H   63    22                     417.3276670  305.48318  26.8%   4.8    0s
*   86    19              13     370.3807970  305.48318  17.5%   4.5    0s
*  245    42              14     353.8013960  309.39770  12.6%   4.3    0s
*  267     8               9     321.3192110  309.39770  3.71%   4.4    0s

Cutting planes:
  Learned: 2
  Gomory: 1
  MIR: 2

Explored 443 nodes (1871 simplex iterations) in 0.13 seconds
Thread count was 2 (of 2 available processors)

Optimal solution found (tolerance 1.00e-04)
Best objective 3.213192110000e+02, best bound 3.213192110000e+02, gap 0.0%
Read MPS format model from file tsp.mps
Reading time = 0.00 seconds
tsp.cmpl: 92 rows, 109 columns, 416 nonzeros
Optimize a model with 92 rows, 109 columns and 416 nonzeros
Presolve time: 0.00s
Presolved: 92 rows, 109 columns, 416 nonzeros
Variable types: 9 continuous, 100 integer (100 binary)
Found heuristic solution: objective 80207.891276

Root relaxation: objective 2.720293e+02, 31 iterations, 0.00 seconds

    Nodes    |    Current Node    |     Objective Bounds      |     Work
 Expl Unexpl |  Obj  Depth IntInf | Incumbent    BestBd   Gap | It/Node Time

     0     0  272.02931    0   18 80207.8913  272.02931   100%     -    0s
     0     0  300.46422    0   16 80207.8913  300.46422   100%     -    0s
     0     0  300.46422    0   16 80207.8913  300.46422   100%     -    0s
*   29     0              21     481.6885330  304.08554  36.9%   5.5    0s
H   48    23                     467.8651610  305.48318  34.7%   5.1    0s
H   63    22                     417.3276670  305.48318  26.8%   4.8    0s
*   86    19              13     370.3807970  305.48318  17.5%   4.5    0s
*  245    42              14     353.8013960  309.39770  12.6%   4.3    0s
*  267     8               9     321.3192110  309.39770  3.71%   4.4    0s

Cutting planes:
  Learned: 2
  Gomory: 1
  MIR: 2

Explored 443 nodes (1871 simplex iterations) in 0.11 seconds
Thread count was 2 (of 2 available processors)

Optimal solution found (tolerance 1.00e-04)
Best objective 3.213192110000e+02, best bound 3.213192110000e+02, gap 0.0%
Read MPS format model from file tsp.mps
Reading time = 0.00 seconds
tsp.cmpl: 92 rows, 109 columns, 416 nonzeros
Optimize a model with 92 rows, 109 columns and 416 nonzeros
Presolve time: 0.00s
Presolved: 92 rows, 109 columns, 416 nonzeros
Variable types: 9 continuous, 100 integer (100 binary)
Found heuristic solution: objective 80207.891276

Root relaxation: objective 2.720293e+02, 31 iterations, 0.00 seconds

    Nodes    |    Current Node    |     Objective Bounds      |     Work
 Expl Unexpl |  Obj  Depth IntInf | Incumbent    BestBd   Gap | It/Node Time

     0     0  272.02931    0   18 80207.8913  272.02931   100%     -    0s
     0     0  300.46422    0   16 80207.8913  300.46422   100%     -    0s
     0     0  300.46422    0   16 80207.8913  300.46422   100%     -    0s
*   29     0              21     481.6885330  304.08554  36.9%   5.5    0s
H   48    23                     467.8651610  305.48318  34.7%   5.1    0s
H   63    22                     417.3276670  305.48318  26.8%   4.8    0s
*   86    19              13     370.3807970  305.48318  17.5%   4.5    0s
*  245    42              14     353.8013960  309.39770  12.6%   4.3    0s
*  267     8               9     321.3192110  309.39770  3.71%   4.4    0s

Cutting planes:
  Learned: 2
  Gomory: 1
  MIR: 2

Explored 443 nodes (1871 simplex iterations) in 0.13 seconds
Thread count was 2 (of 2 available processors)

Optimal solution found (tolerance 1.00e-04)
Best objective 3.213192110000e+02, best bound 3.213192110000e+02, gap 0.0%
Read MPS format model from file tsp.mps
Reading time = 0.00 seconds
tsp.cmpl: 92 rows, 109 columns, 416 nonzeros
Optimize a model with 92 rows, 109 columns and 416 nonzeros
Presolve time: 0.00s
Presolved: 92 rows, 109 columns, 416 nonzeros
Variable types: 9 continuous, 100 integer (100 binary)
Found heuristic solution: objective 80207.891276

Root relaxation: objective 2.720293e+02, 31 iterations, 0.00 seconds

    Nodes    |    Current Node    |     Objective Bounds      |     Work
 Expl Unexpl |  Obj  Depth IntInf | Incumbent    BestBd   Gap | It/Node Time

     0     0  272.02931    0   18 80207.8913  272.02931   100%     -    0s
     0     0  300.46422    0   16 80207.8913  300.46422   100%     -    0s
     0     0  300.46422    0   16 80207.8913  300.46422   100%     -    0s
*   29     0              21     481.6885330  304.08554  36.9%   5.5    0s
H   48    23                     467.8651610  305.48318  34.7%   5.1    0s
H   63    22                     417.3276670  305.48318  26.8%   4.8    0s
*   86    19              13     370.3807970  305.48318  17.5%   4.5    0s
*  245    42              14     353.8013960  309.39770  12.6%   4.3    0s
*  267     8               9     321.3192110  309.39770  3.71%   4.4    0s

Cutting planes:
  Learned: 2
  Gomory: 1
  MIR: 2

Explored 443 nodes (1871 simplex iterations) in 0.13 seconds
Thread count was 2 (of 2 available processors)

Optimal solution found (tolerance 1.00e-04)
Best objective 3.213192110000e+02, best bound 3.213192110000e+02, gap 0.0%
Read MPS format model from file tsp.mps
Reading time = 0.00 seconds
tsp.cmpl: 92 rows, 109 columns, 416 nonzeros
Optimize a model with 92 rows, 109 columns and 416 nonzeros
Presolve time: 0.00s
Presolved: 92 rows, 109 columns, 416 nonzeros
Variable types: 9 continuous, 100 integer (100 binary)
Found heuristic solution: objective 80207.891276

Root relaxation: objective 2.720293e+02, 31 iterations, 0.00 seconds

    Nodes    |    Current Node    |     Objective Bounds      |     Work
 Expl Unexpl |  Obj  Depth IntInf | Incumbent    BestBd   Gap | It/Node Time

     0     0  272.02931    0   18 80207.8913  272.02931   100%     -    0s
     0     0  300.46422    0   16 80207.8913  300.46422   100%     -    0s
     0     0  300.46422    0   16 80207.8913  300.46422   100%     -    0s
*   29     0              21     481.6885330  304.08554  36.9%   5.5    0s
H   48    23                     467.8651610  305.48318  34.7%   5.1    0s
H   63    22                     417.3276670  305.48318  26.8%   4.8    0s
*   86    19              13     370.3807970  305.48318  17.5%   4.5    0s
*  245    42              14     353.8013960  309.39770  12.6%   4.3    0s
*  267     8               9     321.3192110  309.39770  3.71%   4.4    0s

Cutting planes:
  Learned: 2
  Gomory: 1
  MIR: 2

Explored 443 nodes (1871 simplex iterations) in 0.10 seconds
Thread count was 2 (of 2 available processors)

Optimal solution found (tolerance 1.00e-04)
Best objective 3.213192110000e+02, best bound 3.213192110000e+02, gap 0.0%
Read MPS format model from file tsp.mps
Reading time = 0.00 seconds
tsp.cmpl: 92 rows, 109 columns, 416 nonzeros
Optimize a model with 92 rows, 109 columns and 416 nonzeros
Presolve time: 0.00s
Presolved: 92 rows, 109 columns, 416 nonzeros
Variable types: 9 continuous, 100 integer (100 binary)
Found heuristic solution: objective 80207.891276

Root relaxation: objective 2.720293e+02, 31 iterations, 0.00 seconds

    Nodes    |    Current Node    |     Objective Bounds      |     Work
 Expl Unexpl |  Obj  Depth IntInf | Incumbent    BestBd   Gap | It/Node Time

     0     0  272.02931    0   18 80207.8913  272.02931   100%     -    0s
     0     0  300.46422    0   16 80207.8913  300.46422   100%     -    0s
     0     0  300.46422    0   16 80207.8913  300.46422   100%     -    0s
*   29     0              21     481.6885330  304.08554  36.9%   5.5    0s
H   48    23                     467.8651610  305.48318  34.7%   5.1    0s
H   63    22                     417.3276670  305.48318  26.8%   4.8    0s
*   86    19              13     370.3807970  305.48318  17.5%   4.5    0s
*  245    42              14     353.8013960  309.39770  12.6%   4.3    0s
*  267     8               9     321.3192110  309.39770  3.71%   4.4    0s

Cutting planes:
  Learned: 2
  Gomory: 1
  MIR: 2

Explored 443 nodes (1871 simplex iterations) in 0.11 seconds
Thread count was 2 (of 2 available processors)

Optimal solution found (tolerance 1.00e-04)
Best objective 3.213192110000e+02, best bound 3.213192110000e+02, gap 0.0%
Read MPS format model from file tsp.mps
Reading time = 0.00 seconds
tsp.cmpl: 92 rows, 109 columns, 416 nonzeros
Optimize a model with 92 rows, 109 columns and 416 nonzeros
Presolve time: 0.00s
Presolved: 92 rows, 109 columns, 416 nonzeros
Variable types: 9 continuous, 100 integer (100 binary)
Found heuristic solution: objective 80207.891276

Root relaxation: objective 2.720293e+02, 31 iterations, 0.00 seconds

    Nodes    |    Current Node    |     Objective Bounds      |     Work
 Expl Unexpl |  Obj  Depth IntInf | Incumbent    BestBd   Gap | It/Node Time

     0     0  272.02931    0   18 80207.8913  272.02931   100%     -    0s
     0     0  300.46422    0   16 80207.8913  300.46422   100%     -    0s
     0     0  300.46422    0   16 80207.8913  300.46422   100%     -    0s
*   29     0              21     481.6885330  304.08554  36.9%   5.5    0s
H   48    23                     467.8651610  305.48318  34.7%   5.1    0s
H   63    22                     417.3276670  305.48318  26.8%   4.8    0s
*   86    19              13     370.3807970  305.48318  17.5%   4.5    0s
*  245    42              14     353.8013960  309.39770  12.6%   4.3    0s
*  267     8               9     321.3192110  309.39770  3.71%   4.4    0s

Cutting planes:
  Learned: 2
  Gomory: 1
  MIR: 2

Explored 443 nodes (1871 simplex iterations) in 0.11 seconds
Thread count was 2 (of 2 available processors)

Optimal solution found (tolerance 1.00e-04)
Best objective 3.213192110000e+02, best bound 3.213192110000e+02, gap 0.0%
Read MPS format model from file tsp.mps
Reading time = 0.00 seconds
tsp.cmpl: 92 rows, 109 columns, 416 nonzeros
Optimize a model with 92 rows, 109 columns and 416 nonzeros
Presolve time: 0.00s
Presolved: 92 rows, 109 columns, 416 nonzeros
Variable types: 9 continuous, 100 integer (100 binary)
Found heuristic solution: objective 80207.891276

Root relaxation: objective 2.720293e+02, 31 iterations, 0.00 seconds

    Nodes    |    Current Node    |     Objective Bounds      |     Work
 Expl Unexpl |  Obj  Depth IntInf | Incumbent    BestBd   Gap | It/Node Time

     0     0  272.02931    0   18 80207.8913  272.02931   100%     -    0s
     0     0  300.46422    0   16 80207.8913  300.46422   100%     -    0s
     0     0  300.46422    0   16 80207.8913  300.46422   100%     -    0s
*   29     0              21     481.6885330  304.08554  36.9%   5.5    0s
H   48    23                     467.8651610  305.48318  34.7%   5.1    0s
H   63    22                     417.3276670  305.48318  26.8%   4.8    0s
*   86    19              13     370.3807970  305.48318  17.5%   4.5    0s
*  245    42              14     353.8013960  309.39770  12.6%   4.3    0s
*  267     8               9     321.3192110  309.39770  3.71%   4.4    0s

Cutting planes:
  Learned: 2
  Gomory: 1
  MIR: 2

Explored 443 nodes (1871 simplex iterations) in 0.12 seconds
Thread count was 2 (of 2 available processors)

Optimal solution found (tolerance 1.00e-04)
Best objective 3.213192110000e+02, best bound 3.213192110000e+02, gap 0.0%
Read MPS format model from file tsp.mps
Reading time = 0.00 seconds
tsp.cmpl: 92 rows, 109 columns, 416 nonzeros
Optimize a model with 92 rows, 109 columns and 416 nonzeros
Presolve time: 0.00s
Presolved: 92 rows, 109 columns, 416 nonzeros
Variable types: 9 continuous, 100 integer (100 binary)
Found heuristic solution: objective 80207.891276

Root relaxation: objective 2.720293e+02, 31 iterations, 0.00 seconds

    Nodes    |    Current Node    |     Objective Bounds      |     Work
 Expl Unexpl |  Obj  Depth IntInf | Incumbent    BestBd   Gap | It/Node Time

     0     0  272.02931    0   18 80207.8913  272.02931   100%     -    0s
     0     0  300.46422    0   16 80207.8913  300.46422   100%     -    0s
     0     0  300.46422    0   16 80207.8913  300.46422   100%     -    0s
*   29     0              21     481.6885330  304.08554  36.9%   5.5    0s
H   48    23                     467.8651610  305.48318  34.7%   5.1    0s
H   63    22                     417.3276670  305.48318  26.8%   4.8    0s
*   86    19              13     370.3807970  305.48318  17.5%   4.5    0s
*  245    42              14     353.8013960  309.39770  12.6%   4.3    0s
*  267     8               9     321.3192110  309.39770  3.71%   4.4    0s

Cutting planes:
  Learned: 2
  Gomory: 1
  MIR: 2

Explored 443 nodes (1871 simplex iterations) in 0.13 seconds
Thread count was 2 (of 2 available processors)

Optimal solution found (tolerance 1.00e-04)
Best objective 3.213192110000e+02, best bound 3.213192110000e+02, gap 0.0%
Read MPS format model from file tsp.mps
Reading time = 0.00 seconds
tsp.cmpl: 92 rows, 109 columns, 416 nonzeros
Optimize a model with 92 rows, 109 columns and 416 nonzeros
Presolve time: 0.00s
Presolved: 92 rows, 109 columns, 416 nonzeros
Variable types: 9 continuous, 100 integer (100 binary)
Found heuristic solution: objective 80207.891276

Root relaxation: objective 2.720293e+02, 31 iterations, 0.00 seconds

    Nodes    |    Current Node    |     Objective Bounds      |     Work
 Expl Unexpl |  Obj  Depth IntInf | Incumbent    BestBd   Gap | It/Node Time

     0     0  272.02931    0   18 80207.8913  272.02931   100%     -    0s
     0     0  300.46422    0   16 80207.8913  300.46422   100%     -    0s
     0     0  300.46422    0   16 80207.8913  300.46422   100%     -    0s
*   29     0              21     481.6885330  304.08554  36.9%   5.5    0s
H   48    23                     467.8651610  305.48318  34.7%   5.1    0s
H   63    22                     417.3276670  305.48318  26.8%   4.8    0s
*   86    19              13     370.3807970  305.48318  17.5%   4.5    0s
*  245    42              14     353.8013960  309.39770  12.6%   4.3    0s
*  267     8               9     321.3192110  309.39770  3.71%   4.4    0s

Cutting planes:
  Learned: 2
  Gomory: 1
  MIR: 2

Explored 443 nodes (1871 simplex iterations) in 0.14 seconds
Thread count was 2 (of 2 available processors)

Optimal solution found (tolerance 1.00e-04)
Best objective 3.213192110000e+02, best bound 3.213192110000e+02, gap 0.0%
Read MPS format model from file tsp.mps
Reading time = 0.00 seconds
tsp.cmpl: 92 rows, 109 columns, 416 nonzeros
Optimize a model with 92 rows, 109 columns and 416 nonzeros
Presolve time: 0.00s
Presolved: 92 rows, 109 columns, 416 nonzeros
Variable types: 9 continuous, 100 integer (100 binary)
Found heuristic solution: objective 80207.891276

Root relaxation: objective 2.720293e+02, 31 iterations, 0.00 seconds

    Nodes    |    Current Node    |     Objective Bounds      |     Work
 Expl Unexpl |  Obj  Depth IntInf | Incumbent    BestBd   Gap | It/Node Time

     0     0  272.02931    0   18 80207.8913  272.02931   100%     -    0s
     0     0  300.46422    0   16 80207.8913  300.46422   100%     -    0s
     0     0  300.46422    0   16 80207.8913  300.46422   100%     -    0s
*   29     0              21     481.6885330  304.08554  36.9%   5.5    0s
H   48    23                     467.8651610  305.48318  34.7%   5.1    0s
H   63    22                     417.3276670  305.48318  26.8%   4.8    0s
*   86    19              13     370.3807970  305.48318  17.5%   4.5    0s
*  245    42              14     353.8013960  309.39770  12.6%   4.3    0s
*  267     8               9     321.3192110  309.39770  3.71%   4.4    0s

Cutting planes:
  Learned: 2
  Gomory: 1
  MIR: 2

Explored 443 nodes (1871 simplex iterations) in 0.11 seconds
Thread count was 2 (of 2 available processors)

Optimal solution found (tolerance 1.00e-04)
Best objective 3.213192110000e+02, best bound 3.213192110000e+02, gap 0.0%
Read MPS format model from file tsp.mps
Reading time = 0.00 seconds
tsp.cmpl: 92 rows, 109 columns, 416 nonzeros
Optimize a model with 92 rows, 109 columns and 416 nonzeros
Presolve time: 0.00s
Presolved: 92 rows, 109 columns, 416 nonzeros
Variable types: 9 continuous, 100 integer (100 binary)
Found heuristic solution: objective 80207.891276

Root relaxation: objective 2.720293e+02, 31 iterations, 0.00 seconds

    Nodes    |    Current Node    |     Objective Bounds      |     Work
 Expl Unexpl |  Obj  Depth IntInf | Incumbent    BestBd   Gap | It/Node Time

     0     0  272.02931    0   18 80207.8913  272.02931   100%     -    0s
     0     0  300.46422    0   16 80207.8913  300.46422   100%     -    0s
     0     0  300.46422    0   16 80207.8913  300.46422   100%     -    0s
*   29     0              21     481.6885330  304.08554  36.9%   5.5    0s
H   48    23                     467.8651610  305.48318  34.7%   5.1    0s
H   63    22                     417.3276670  305.48318  26.8%   4.8    0s
*   86    19              13     370.3807970  305.48318  17.5%   4.5    0s
*  245    42              14     353.8013960  309.39770  12.6%   4.3    0s
*  267     8               9     321.3192110  309.39770  3.71%   4.4    0s

Cutting planes:
  Learned: 2
  Gomory: 1
  MIR: 2

Explored 443 nodes (1871 simplex iterations) in 0.10 seconds
Thread count was 2 (of 2 available processors)

Optimal solution found (tolerance 1.00e-04)
Best objective 3.213192110000e+02, best bound 3.213192110000e+02, gap 0.0%
Read MPS format model from file tsp.mps
Reading time = 0.00 seconds
tsp.cmpl: 92 rows, 109 columns, 416 nonzeros
Optimize a model with 92 rows, 109 columns and 416 nonzeros
Presolve time: 0.00s
Presolved: 92 rows, 109 columns, 416 nonzeros
Variable types: 9 continuous, 100 integer (100 binary)
Found heuristic solution: objective 80207.891276

Root relaxation: objective 2.720293e+02, 31 iterations, 0.00 seconds

    Nodes    |    Current Node    |     Objective Bounds      |     Work
 Expl Unexpl |  Obj  Depth IntInf | Incumbent    BestBd   Gap | It/Node Time

     0     0  272.02931    0   18 80207.8913  272.02931   100%     -    0s
     0     0  300.46422    0   16 80207.8913  300.46422   100%     -    0s
     0     0  300.46422    0   16 80207.8913  300.46422   100%     -    0s
*   29     0              21     481.6885330  304.08554  36.9%   5.5    0s
H   48    23                     467.8651610  305.48318  34.7%   5.1    0s
H   63    22                     417.3276670  305.48318  26.8%   4.8    0s
*   86    19              13     370.3807970  305.48318  17.5%   4.5    0s
*  245    42              14     353.8013960  309.39770  12.6%   4.3    0s
*  267     8               9     321.3192110  309.39770  3.71%   4.4    0s

Cutting planes:
  Learned: 2
  Gomory: 1
  MIR: 2

Explored 443 nodes (1871 simplex iterations) in 0.10 seconds
Thread count was 2 (of 2 available processors)

Optimal solution found (tolerance 1.00e-04)
Best objective 3.213192110000e+02, best bound 3.213192110000e+02, gap 0.0%
Read MPS format model from file tsp.mps
Reading time = 0.00 seconds
tsp.cmpl: 92 rows, 109 columns, 416 nonzeros
Optimize a model with 92 rows, 109 columns and 416 nonzeros
Presolve time: 0.00s
Presolved: 92 rows, 109 columns, 416 nonzeros
Variable types: 9 continuous, 100 integer (100 binary)
Found heuristic solution: objective 80207.891276

Root relaxation: objective 2.720293e+02, 31 iterations, 0.00 seconds

    Nodes    |    Current Node    |     Objective Bounds      |     Work
 Expl Unexpl |  Obj  Depth IntInf | Incumbent    BestBd   Gap | It/Node Time

     0     0  272.02931    0   18 80207.8913  272.02931   100%     -    0s
     0     0  300.46422    0   16 80207.8913  300.46422   100%     -    0s
     0     0  300.46422    0   16 80207.8913  300.46422   100%     -    0s
*   29     0              21     481.6885330  304.08554  36.9%   5.5    0s
H   48    23                     467.8651610  305.48318  34.7%   5.1    0s
H   63    22                     417.3276670  305.48318  26.8%   4.8    0s
*   86    19              13     370.3807970  305.48318  17.5%   4.5    0s
*  245    42              14     353.8013960  309.39770  12.6%   4.3    0s
*  267     8               9     321.3192110  309.39770  3.71%   4.4    0s

Cutting planes:
  Learned: 2
  Gomory: 1
  MIR: 2

Explored 443 nodes (1871 simplex iterations) in 0.10 seconds
Thread count was 2 (of 2 available processors)

Optimal solution found (tolerance 1.00e-04)
Best objective 3.213192110000e+02, best bound 3.213192110000e+02, gap 0.0%
Read MPS format model from file tsp.mps
Reading time = 0.00 seconds
tsp.cmpl: 92 rows, 109 columns, 416 nonzeros
Optimize a model with 92 rows, 109 columns and 416 nonzeros
Presolve time: 0.00s
Presolved: 92 rows, 109 columns, 416 nonzeros
Variable types: 9 continuous, 100 integer (100 binary)
Found heuristic solution: objective 80207.891276

Root relaxation: objective 2.720293e+02, 31 iterations, 0.00 seconds

    Nodes    |    Current Node    |     Objective Bounds      |     Work
 Expl Unexpl |  Obj  Depth IntInf | Incumbent    BestBd   Gap | It/Node Time

     0     0  272.02931    0   18 80207.8913  272.02931   100%     -    0s
     0     0  300.46422    0   16 80207.8913  300.46422   100%     -    0s
     0     0  300.46422    0   16 80207.8913  300.46422   100%     -    0s
*   29     0              21     481.6885330  304.08554  36.9%   5.5    0s
H   48    23                     467.8651610  305.48318  34.7%   5.1    0s
H   63    22                     417.3276670  305.48318  26.8%   4.8    0s
*   86    19              13     370.3807970  305.48318  17.5%   4.5    0s
*  245    42              14     353.8013960  309.39770  12.6%   4.3    0s
*  267     8               9     321.3192110  309.39770  3.71%   4.4    0s

Cutting planes:
  Learned: 2
  Gomory: 1
  MIR: 2

Explored 443 nodes (1871 simplex iterations) in 0.12 seconds
Thread count was 2 (of 2 available processors)

Optimal solution found (tolerance 1.00e-04)
Best objective 3.213192110000e+02, best bound 3.213192110000e+02, gap 0.0%
Read MPS format model from file tsp.mps
Reading time = 0.00 seconds
tsp.cmpl: 92 rows, 109 columns, 416 nonzeros
Optimize a model with 92 rows, 109 columns and 416 nonzeros
Presolve time: 0.00s
Presolved: 92 rows, 109 columns, 416 nonzeros
Variable types: 9 continuous, 100 integer (100 binary)
Found heuristic solution: objective 80207.891276

Root relaxation: objective 2.720293e+02, 31 iterations, 0.00 seconds

    Nodes    |    Current Node    |     Objective Bounds      |     Work
 Expl Unexpl |  Obj  Depth IntInf | Incumbent    BestBd   Gap | It/Node Time

     0     0  272.02931    0   18 80207.8913  272.02931   100%     -    0s
     0     0  300.46422    0   16 80207.8913  300.46422   100%     -    0s
     0     0  300.46422    0   16 80207.8913  300.46422   100%     -    0s
*   29     0              21     481.6885330  304.08554  36.9%   5.5    0s
H   48    23                     467.8651610  305.48318  34.7%   5.1    0s
H   63    22                     417.3276670  305.48318  26.8%   4.8    0s
*   86    19              13     370.3807970  305.48318  17.5%   4.5    0s
*  245    42              14     353.8013960  309.39770  12.6%   4.3    0s
*  267     8               9     321.3192110  309.39770  3.71%   4.4    0s

Cutting planes:
  Learned: 2
  Gomory: 1
  MIR: 2

Explored 443 nodes (1871 simplex iterations) in 0.15 seconds
Thread count was 2 (of 2 available processors)

Optimal solution found (tolerance 1.00e-04)
Best objective 3.213192110000e+02, best bound 3.213192110000e+02, gap 0.0%
Read MPS format model from file tsp.mps
Reading time = 0.00 seconds
tsp.cmpl: 92 rows, 109 columns, 416 nonzeros
Optimize a model with 92 rows, 109 columns and 416 nonzeros
Presolve time: 0.00s
Presolved: 92 rows, 109 columns, 416 nonzeros
Variable types: 9 continuous, 100 integer (100 binary)
Found heuristic solution: objective 80207.891276

Root relaxation: objective 2.720293e+02, 31 iterations, 0.00 seconds

    Nodes    |    Current Node    |     Objective Bounds      |     Work
 Expl Unexpl |  Obj  Depth IntInf | Incumbent    BestBd   Gap | It/Node Time

     0     0  272.02931    0   18 80207.8913  272.02931   100%     -    0s
     0     0  300.46422    0   16 80207.8913  300.46422   100%     -    0s
     0     0  300.46422    0   16 80207.8913  300.46422   100%     -    0s
*   29     0              21     481.6885330  304.08554  36.9%   5.5    0s
H   48    23                     467.8651610  305.48318  34.7%   5.1    0s
H   63    22                     417.3276670  305.48318  26.8%   4.8    0s
*   86    19              13     370.3807970  305.48318  17.5%   4.5    0s
*  245    42              14     353.8013960  309.39770  12.6%   4.3    0s
*  267     8               9     321.3192110  309.39770  3.71%   4.4    0s

Cutting planes:
  Learned: 2
  Gomory: 1
  MIR: 2

Explored 443 nodes (1871 simplex iterations) in 0.14 seconds
Thread count was 2 (of 2 available processors)

Optimal solution found (tolerance 1.00e-04)
Best objective 3.213192110000e+02, best bound 3.213192110000e+02, gap 0.0%
Read MPS format model from file tsp.mps
Reading time = 0.00 seconds
tsp.cmpl: 92 rows, 109 columns, 416 nonzeros
Optimize a model with 92 rows, 109 columns and 416 nonzeros
Presolve time: 0.00s
Presolved: 92 rows, 109 columns, 416 nonzeros
Variable types: 9 continuous, 100 integer (100 binary)
Found heuristic solution: objective 80207.891276

Root relaxation: objective 2.720293e+02, 31 iterations, 0.00 seconds

    Nodes    |    Current Node    |     Objective Bounds      |     Work
 Expl Unexpl |  Obj  Depth IntInf | Incumbent    BestBd   Gap | It/Node Time

     0     0  272.02931    0   18 80207.8913  272.02931   100%     -    0s
     0     0  300.46422    0   16 80207.8913  300.46422   100%     -    0s
     0     0  300.46422    0   16 80207.8913  300.46422   100%     -    0s
*   29     0              21     481.6885330  304.08554  36.9%   5.5    0s
H   48    23                     467.8651610  305.48318  34.7%   5.1    0s
H   63    22                     417.3276670  305.48318  26.8%   4.8    0s
*   86    19              13     370.3807970  305.48318  17.5%   4.5    0s
*  245    42              14     353.8013960  309.39770  12.6%   4.3    0s
*  267     8               9     321.3192110  309.39770  3.71%   4.4    0s

Cutting planes:
  Learned: 2
  Gomory: 1
  MIR: 2

Explored 443 nodes (1871 simplex iterations) in 0.13 seconds
Thread count was 2 (of 2 available processors)

Optimal solution found (tolerance 1.00e-04)
Best objective 3.213192110000e+02, best bound 3.213192110000e+02, gap 0.0%
Read MPS format model from file tsp.mps
Reading time = 0.00 seconds
tsp.cmpl: 92 rows, 109 columns, 416 nonzeros
Optimize a model with 92 rows, 109 columns and 416 nonzeros
Presolve time: 0.00s
Presolved: 92 rows, 109 columns, 416 nonzeros
Variable types: 9 continuous, 100 integer (100 binary)
Found heuristic solution: objective 80207.891276

Root relaxation: objective 2.720293e+02, 31 iterations, 0.00 seconds

    Nodes    |    Current Node    |     Objective Bounds      |     Work
 Expl Unexpl |  Obj  Depth IntInf | Incumbent    BestBd   Gap | It/Node Time

     0     0  272.02931    0   18 80207.8913  272.02931   100%     -    0s
     0     0  300.46422    0   16 80207.8913  300.46422   100%     -    0s
     0     0  300.46422    0   16 80207.8913  300.46422   100%     -    0s
*   29     0              21     481.6885330  304.08554  36.9%   5.5    0s
H   48    23                     467.8651610  305.48318  34.7%   5.1    0s
H   63    22                     417.3276670  305.48318  26.8%   4.8    0s
*   86    19              13     370.3807970  305.48318  17.5%   4.5    0s
*  245    42              14     353.8013960  309.39770  12.6%   4.3    0s
*  267     8               9     321.3192110  309.39770  3.71%   4.4    0s

Cutting planes:
  Learned: 2
  Gomory: 1
  MIR: 2

Explored 443 nodes (1871 simplex iterations) in 0.10 seconds
Thread count was 2 (of 2 available processors)

Optimal solution found (tolerance 1.00e-04)
Best objective 3.213192110000e+02, best bound 3.213192110000e+02, gap 0.0%
Read MPS format model from file tsp.mps
Reading time = 0.00 seconds
tsp.cmpl: 92 rows, 109 columns, 416 nonzeros
Optimize a model with 92 rows, 109 columns and 416 nonzeros
Presolve time: 0.00s
Presolved: 92 rows, 109 columns, 416 nonzeros
Variable types: 9 continuous, 100 integer (100 binary)
Found heuristic solution: objective 80207.891276

Root relaxation: objective 2.720293e+02, 31 iterations, 0.00 seconds

    Nodes    |    Current Node    |     Objective Bounds      |     Work
 Expl Unexpl |  Obj  Depth IntInf | Incumbent    BestBd   Gap | It/Node Time

     0     0  272.02931    0   18 80207.8913  272.02931   100%     -    0s
     0     0  300.46422    0   16 80207.8913  300.46422   100%     -    0s
     0     0  300.46422    0   16 80207.8913  300.46422   100%     -    0s
*   29     0              21     481.6885330  304.08554  36.9%   5.5    0s
H   48    23                     467.8651610  305.48318  34.7%   5.1    0s
H   63    22                     417.3276670  305.48318  26.8%   4.8    0s
*   86    19              13     370.3807970  305.48318  17.5%   4.5    0s
*  245    42              14     353.8013960  309.39770  12.6%   4.3    0s
*  267     8               9     321.3192110  309.39770  3.71%   4.4    0s

Cutting planes:
  Learned: 2
  Gomory: 1
  MIR: 2

Explored 443 nodes (1871 simplex iterations) in 0.13 seconds
Thread count was 2 (of 2 available processors)

Optimal solution found (tolerance 1.00e-04)
Best objective 3.213192110000e+02, best bound 3.213192110000e+02, gap 0.0%
Read MPS format model from file tsp.mps
Reading time = 0.00 seconds
tsp.cmpl: 92 rows, 109 columns, 416 nonzeros
Optimize a model with 92 rows, 109 columns and 416 nonzeros
Presolve time: 0.00s
Presolved: 92 rows, 109 columns, 416 nonzeros
Variable types: 9 continuous, 100 integer (100 binary)
Found heuristic solution: objective 80207.891276

Root relaxation: objective 2.720293e+02, 31 iterations, 0.00 seconds

    Nodes    |    Current Node    |     Objective Bounds      |     Work
 Expl Unexpl |  Obj  Depth IntInf | Incumbent    BestBd   Gap | It/Node Time

     0     0  272.02931    0   18 80207.8913  272.02931   100%     -    0s
     0     0  300.46422    0   16 80207.8913  300.46422   100%     -    0s
     0     0  300.46422    0   16 80207.8913  300.46422   100%     -    0s
*   29     0              21     481.6885330  304.08554  36.9%   5.5    0s
H   48    23                     467.8651610  305.48318  34.7%   5.1    0s
H   63    22                     417.3276670  305.48318  26.8%   4.8    0s
*   86    19              13     370.3807970  305.48318  17.5%   4.5    0s
*  245    42              14     353.8013960  309.39770  12.6%   4.3    0s
*  267     8               9     321.3192110  309.39770  3.71%   4.4    0s

Cutting planes:
  Learned: 2
  Gomory: 1
  MIR: 2

Explored 443 nodes (1871 simplex iterations) in 0.13 seconds
Thread count was 2 (of 2 available processors)

Optimal solution found (tolerance 1.00e-04)
Best objective 3.213192110000e+02, best bound 3.213192110000e+02, gap 0.0%
Read MPS format model from file tsp.mps
Reading time = 0.00 seconds
tsp.cmpl: 92 rows, 109 columns, 416 nonzeros
Optimize a model with 92 rows, 109 columns and 416 nonzeros
Presolve time: 0.00s
Presolved: 92 rows, 109 columns, 416 nonzeros
Variable types: 9 continuous, 100 integer (100 binary)
Found heuristic solution: objective 80207.891276

Root relaxation: objective 2.720293e+02, 31 iterations, 0.00 seconds

    Nodes    |    Current Node    |     Objective Bounds      |     Work
 Expl Unexpl |  Obj  Depth IntInf | Incumbent    BestBd   Gap | It/Node Time

     0     0  272.02931    0   18 80207.8913  272.02931   100%     -    0s
     0     0  300.46422    0   16 80207.8913  300.46422   100%     -    0s
     0     0  300.46422    0   16 80207.8913  300.46422   100%     -    0s
*   29     0              21     481.6885330  304.08554  36.9%   5.5    0s
H   48    23                     467.8651610  305.48318  34.7%   5.1    0s
H   63    22                     417.3276670  305.48318  26.8%   4.8    0s
*   86    19              13     370.3807970  305.48318  17.5%   4.5    0s
*  245    42              14     353.8013960  309.39770  12.6%   4.3    0s
*  267     8               9     321.3192110  309.39770  3.71%   4.4    0s

Cutting planes:
  Learned: 2
  Gomory: 1
  MIR: 2

Explored 443 nodes (1871 simplex iterations) in 0.13 seconds
Thread count was 2 (of 2 available processors)

Optimal solution found (tolerance 1.00e-04)
Best objective 3.213192110000e+02, best bound 3.213192110000e+02, gap 0.0%
Read MPS format model from file tsp.mps
Reading time = 0.00 seconds
tsp.cmpl: 92 rows, 109 columns, 416 nonzeros
Optimize a model with 92 rows, 109 columns and 416 nonzeros
Presolve time: 0.00s
Presolved: 92 rows, 109 columns, 416 nonzeros
Variable types: 9 continuous, 100 integer (100 binary)
Found heuristic solution: objective 80207.891276

Root relaxation: objective 2.720293e+02, 31 iterations, 0.00 seconds

    Nodes    |    Current Node    |     Objective Bounds      |     Work
 Expl Unexpl |  Obj  Depth IntInf | Incumbent    BestBd   Gap | It/Node Time

     0     0  272.02931    0   18 80207.8913  272.02931   100%     -    0s
     0     0  300.46422    0   16 80207.8913  300.46422   100%     -    0s
     0     0  300.46422    0   16 80207.8913  300.46422   100%     -    0s
*   29     0              21     481.6885330  304.08554  36.9%   5.5    0s
H   48    23                     467.8651610  305.48318  34.7%   5.1    0s
H   63    22                     417.3276670  305.48318  26.8%   4.8    0s
*   86    19              13     370.3807970  305.48318  17.5%   4.5    0s
*  245    42              14     353.8013960  309.39770  12.6%   4.3    0s
*  267     8               9     321.3192110  309.39770  3.71%   4.4    0s

Cutting planes:
  Learned: 2
  Gomory: 1
  MIR: 2

Explored 443 nodes (1871 simplex iterations) in 0.14 seconds
Thread count was 2 (of 2 available processors)

Optimal solution found (tolerance 1.00e-04)
Best objective 3.213192110000e+02, best bound 3.213192110000e+02, gap 0.0%
Read MPS format model from file tsp.mps
Reading time = 0.00 seconds
tsp.cmpl: 92 rows, 109 columns, 416 nonzeros
Optimize a model with 92 rows, 109 columns and 416 nonzeros
Presolve time: 0.00s
Presolved: 92 rows, 109 columns, 416 nonzeros
Variable types: 9 continuous, 100 integer (100 binary)
Found heuristic solution: objective 80207.891276

Root relaxation: objective 2.720293e+02, 31 iterations, 0.00 seconds

    Nodes    |    Current Node    |     Objective Bounds      |     Work
 Expl Unexpl |  Obj  Depth IntInf | Incumbent    BestBd   Gap | It/Node Time

     0     0  272.02931    0   18 80207.8913  272.02931   100%     -    0s
     0     0  300.46422    0   16 80207.8913  300.46422   100%     -    0s
     0     0  300.46422    0   16 80207.8913  300.46422   100%     -    0s
*   29     0              21     481.6885330  304.08554  36.9%   5.5    0s
H   48    23                     467.8651610  305.48318  34.7%   5.1    0s
H   63    22                     417.3276670  305.48318  26.8%   4.8    0s
*   86    19              13     370.3807970  305.48318  17.5%   4.5    0s
*  245    42              14     353.8013960  309.39770  12.6%   4.3    0s
*  267     8               9     321.3192110  309.39770  3.71%   4.4    0s

Cutting planes:
  Learned: 2
  Gomory: 1
  MIR: 2

Explored 443 nodes (1871 simplex iterations) in 0.12 seconds
Thread count was 2 (of 2 available processors)

Optimal solution found (tolerance 1.00e-04)
Best objective 3.213192110000e+02, best bound 3.213192110000e+02, gap 0.0%
Read MPS format model from file tsp.mps
Reading time = 0.00 seconds
tsp.cmpl: 92 rows, 109 columns, 416 nonzeros
Optimize a model with 92 rows, 109 columns and 416 nonzeros
Presolve time: 0.00s
Presolved: 92 rows, 109 columns, 416 nonzeros
Variable types: 9 continuous, 100 integer (100 binary)
Found heuristic solution: objective 80207.891276

Root relaxation: objective 2.720293e+02, 31 iterations, 0.00 seconds

    Nodes    |    Current Node    |     Objective Bounds      |     Work
 Expl Unexpl |  Obj  Depth IntInf | Incumbent    BestBd   Gap | It/Node Time

     0     0  272.02931    0   18 80207.8913  272.02931   100%     -    0s
     0     0  300.46422    0   16 80207.8913  300.46422   100%     -    0s
     0     0  300.46422    0   16 80207.8913  300.46422   100%     -    0s
*   29     0              21     481.6885330  304.08554  36.9%   5.5    0s
H   48    23                     467.8651610  305.48318  34.7%   5.1    0s
H   63    22                     417.3276670  305.48318  26.8%   4.8    0s
*   86    19              13     370.3807970  305.48318  17.5%   4.5    0s
*  245    42              14     353.8013960  309.39770  12.6%   4.3    0s
*  267     8               9     321.3192110  309.39770  3.71%   4.4    0s

Cutting planes:
  Learned: 2
  Gomory: 1
  MIR: 2

Explored 443 nodes (1871 simplex iterations) in 0.10 seconds
Thread count was 2 (of 2 available processors)

Optimal solution found (tolerance 1.00e-04)
Best objective 3.213192110000e+02, best bound 3.213192110000e+02, gap 0.0%
Read MPS format model from file tsp.mps
Reading time = 0.00 seconds
tsp.cmpl: 92 rows, 109 columns, 416 nonzeros
Optimize a model with 92 rows, 109 columns and 416 nonzeros
Presolve time: 0.00s
Presolved: 92 rows, 109 columns, 416 nonzeros
Variable types: 9 continuous, 100 integer (100 binary)
Found heuristic solution: objective 80207.891276

Root relaxation: objective 2.720293e+02, 31 iterations, 0.00 seconds

    Nodes    |    Current Node    |     Objective Bounds      |     Work
 Expl Unexpl |  Obj  Depth IntInf | Incumbent    BestBd   Gap | It/Node Time

     0     0  272.02931    0   18 80207.8913  272.02931   100%     -    0s
     0     0  300.46422    0   16 80207.8913  300.46422   100%     -    0s
     0     0  300.46422    0   16 80207.8913  300.46422   100%     -    0s
*   29     0              21     481.6885330  304.08554  36.9%   5.5    0s
H   48    23                     467.8651610  305.48318  34.7%   5.1    0s
H   63    22                     417.3276670  305.48318  26.8%   4.8    0s
*   86    19              13     370.3807970  305.48318  17.5%   4.5    0s
*  245    42              14     353.8013960  309.39770  12.6%   4.3    0s
*  267     8               9     321.3192110  309.39770  3.71%   4.4    0s

Cutting planes:
  Learned: 2
  Gomory: 1
  MIR: 2

Explored 443 nodes (1871 simplex iterations) in 0.11 seconds
Thread count was 2 (of 2 available processors)

Optimal solution found (tolerance 1.00e-04)
Best objective 3.213192110000e+02, best bound 3.213192110000e+02, gap 0.0%
Read MPS format model from file tsp.mps
Reading time = 0.00 seconds
tsp.cmpl: 92 rows, 109 columns, 416 nonzeros
Optimize a model with 92 rows, 109 columns and 416 nonzeros
Presolve time: 0.00s
Presolved: 92 rows, 109 columns, 416 nonzeros
Variable types: 9 continuous, 100 integer (100 binary)
Found heuristic solution: objective 80207.891276

Root relaxation: objective 2.720293e+02, 31 iterations, 0.00 seconds

    Nodes    |    Current Node    |     Objective Bounds      |     Work
 Expl Unexpl |  Obj  Depth IntInf | Incumbent    BestBd   Gap | It/Node Time

     0     0  272.02931    0   18 80207.8913  272.02931   100%     -    0s
     0     0  300.46422    0   16 80207.8913  300.46422   100%     -    0s
     0     0  300.46422    0   16 80207.8913  300.46422   100%     -    0s
*   29     0              21     481.6885330  304.08554  36.9%   5.5    0s
H   48    23                     467.8651610  305.48318  34.7%   5.1    0s
H   63    22                     417.3276670  305.48318  26.8%   4.8    0s
*   86    19              13     370.3807970  305.48318  17.5%   4.5    0s
*  245    42              14     353.8013960  309.39770  12.6%   4.3    0s
*  267     8               9     321.3192110  309.39770  3.71%   4.4    0s

Cutting planes:
  Learned: 2
  Gomory: 1
  MIR: 2

Explored 443 nodes (1871 simplex iterations) in 0.12 seconds
Thread count was 2 (of 2 available processors)

Optimal solution found (tolerance 1.00e-04)
Best objective 3.213192110000e+02, best bound 3.213192110000e+02, gap 0.0%
Read MPS format model from file tsp.mps
Reading time = 0.00 seconds
tsp.cmpl: 92 rows, 109 columns, 416 nonzeros
Optimize a model with 92 rows, 109 columns and 416 nonzeros
Presolve time: 0.00s
Presolved: 92 rows, 109 columns, 416 nonzeros
Variable types: 9 continuous, 100 integer (100 binary)
Found heuristic solution: objective 80207.891276

Root relaxation: objective 2.720293e+02, 31 iterations, 0.00 seconds

    Nodes    |    Current Node    |     Objective Bounds      |     Work
 Expl Unexpl |  Obj  Depth IntInf | Incumbent    BestBd   Gap | It/Node Time

     0     0  272.02931    0   18 80207.8913  272.02931   100%     -    0s
     0     0  300.46422    0   16 80207.8913  300.46422   100%     -    0s
     0     0  300.46422    0   16 80207.8913  300.46422   100%     -    0s
*   29     0              21     481.6885330  304.08554  36.9%   5.5    0s
H   48    23                     467.8651610  305.48318  34.7%   5.1    0s
H   63    22                     417.3276670  305.48318  26.8%   4.8    0s
*   86    19              13     370.3807970  305.48318  17.5%   4.5    0s
*  245    42              14     353.8013960  309.39770  12.6%   4.3    0s
*  267     8               9     321.3192110  309.39770  3.71%   4.4    0s

Cutting planes:
  Learned: 2
  Gomory: 1
  MIR: 2

Explored 443 nodes (1871 simplex iterations) in 0.15 seconds
Thread count was 2 (of 2 available processors)

Optimal solution found (tolerance 1.00e-04)
Best objective 3.213192110000e+02, best bound 3.213192110000e+02, gap 0.0%
Read MPS format model from file tsp.mps
Reading time = 0.00 seconds
tsp.cmpl: 92 rows, 109 columns, 416 nonzeros
Optimize a model with 92 rows, 109 columns and 416 nonzeros
Presolve time: 0.00s
Presolved: 92 rows, 109 columns, 416 nonzeros
Variable types: 9 continuous, 100 integer (100 binary)
Found heuristic solution: objective 80207.891276

Root relaxation: objective 2.720293e+02, 31 iterations, 0.00 seconds

    Nodes    |    Current Node    |     Objective Bounds      |     Work
 Expl Unexpl |  Obj  Depth IntInf | Incumbent    BestBd   Gap | It/Node Time

     0     0  272.02931    0   18 80207.8913  272.02931   100%     -    0s
     0     0  300.46422    0   16 80207.8913  300.46422   100%     -    0s
     0     0  300.46422    0   16 80207.8913  300.46422   100%     -    0s
*   29     0              21     481.6885330  304.08554  36.9%   5.5    0s
H   48    23                     467.8651610  305.48318  34.7%   5.1    0s
H   63    22                     417.3276670  305.48318  26.8%   4.8    0s
*   86    19              13     370.3807970  305.48318  17.5%   4.5    0s
*  245    42              14     353.8013960  309.39770  12.6%   4.3    0s
*  267     8               9     321.3192110  309.39770  3.71%   4.4    0s

Cutting planes:
  Learned: 2
  Gomory: 1
  MIR: 2

Explored 443 nodes (1871 simplex iterations) in 0.13 seconds
Thread count was 2 (of 2 available processors)

Optimal solution found (tolerance 1.00e-04)
Best objective 3.213192110000e+02, best bound 3.213192110000e+02, gap 0.0%
Read MPS format model from file tsp.mps
Reading time = 0.00 seconds
tsp.cmpl: 92 rows, 109 columns, 416 nonzeros
Optimize a model with 92 rows, 109 columns and 416 nonzeros
Presolve time: 0.00s
Presolved: 92 rows, 109 columns, 416 nonzeros
Variable types: 9 continuous, 100 integer (100 binary)
Found heuristic solution: objective 80207.891276

Root relaxation: objective 2.720293e+02, 31 iterations, 0.00 seconds

    Nodes    |    Current Node    |     Objective Bounds      |     Work
 Expl Unexpl |  Obj  Depth IntInf | Incumbent    BestBd   Gap | It/Node Time

     0     0  272.02931    0   18 80207.8913  272.02931   100%     -    0s
     0     0  300.46422    0   16 80207.8913  300.46422   100%     -    0s
     0     0  300.46422    0   16 80207.8913  300.46422   100%     -    0s
*   29     0              21     481.6885330  304.08554  36.9%   5.5    0s
H   48    23                     467.8651610  305.48318  34.7%   5.1    0s
H   63    22                     417.3276670  305.48318  26.8%   4.8    0s
*   86    19              13     370.3807970  305.48318  17.5%   4.5    0s
*  245    42              14     353.8013960  309.39770  12.6%   4.3    0s
*  267     8               9     321.3192110  309.39770  3.71%   4.4    0s

Cutting planes:
  Learned: 2
  Gomory: 1
  MIR: 2

Explored 443 nodes (1871 simplex iterations) in 0.10 seconds
Thread count was 2 (of 2 available processors)

Optimal solution found (tolerance 1.00e-04)
Best objective 3.213192110000e+02, best bound 3.213192110000e+02, gap 0.0%
Read MPS format model from file tsp.mps
Reading time = 0.00 seconds
tsp.cmpl: 92 rows, 109 columns, 416 nonzeros
Optimize a model with 92 rows, 109 columns and 416 nonzeros
Presolve time: 0.00s
Presolved: 92 rows, 109 columns, 416 nonzeros
Variable types: 9 continuous, 100 integer (100 binary)
Found heuristic solution: objective 80207.891276

Root relaxation: objective 2.720293e+02, 31 iterations, 0.00 seconds

    Nodes    |    Current Node    |     Objective Bounds      |     Work
 Expl Unexpl |  Obj  Depth IntInf | Incumbent    BestBd   Gap | It/Node Time

     0     0  272.02931    0   18 80207.8913  272.02931   100%     -    0s
     0     0  300.46422    0   16 80207.8913  300.46422   100%     -    0s
     0     0  300.46422    0   16 80207.8913  300.46422   100%     -    0s
*   29     0              21     481.6885330  304.08554  36.9%   5.5    0s
H   48    23                     467.8651610  305.48318  34.7%   5.1    0s
H   63    22                     417.3276670  305.48318  26.8%   4.8    0s
*   86    19              13     370.3807970  305.48318  17.5%   4.5    0s
*  245    42              14     353.8013960  309.39770  12.6%   4.3    0s
*  267     8               9     321.3192110  309.39770  3.71%   4.4    0s

Cutting planes:
  Learned: 2
  Gomory: 1
  MIR: 2

Explored 443 nodes (1871 simplex iterations) in 0.37 seconds
Thread count was 2 (of 2 available processors)

Optimal solution found (tolerance 1.00e-04)
Best objective 3.213192110000e+02, best bound 3.213192110000e+02, gap 0.0%
Read MPS format model from file tsp.mps
Reading time = 0.00 seconds
tsp.cmpl: 92 rows, 109 columns, 416 nonzeros
Optimize a model with 92 rows, 109 columns and 416 nonzeros
Presolve time: 0.00s
Presolved: 92 rows, 109 columns, 416 nonzeros
Variable types: 9 continuous, 100 integer (100 binary)
Found heuristic solution: objective 80207.891276

Root relaxation: objective 2.720293e+02, 31 iterations, 0.00 seconds

    Nodes    |    Current Node    |     Objective Bounds      |     Work
 Expl Unexpl |  Obj  Depth IntInf | Incumbent    BestBd   Gap | It/Node Time

     0     0  272.02931    0   18 80207.8913  272.02931   100%     -    0s
     0     0  300.46422    0   16 80207.8913  300.46422   100%     -    0s
     0     0  300.46422    0   16 80207.8913  300.46422   100%     -    0s
*   29     0              21     481.6885330  304.08554  36.9%   5.5    0s
H   48    23                     467.8651610  305.48318  34.7%   5.1    0s
H   63    22                     417.3276670  305.48318  26.8%   4.8    0s
*   86    19              13     370.3807970  305.48318  17.5%   4.5    0s
*  245    42              14     353.8013960  309.39770  12.6%   4.3    0s
*  267     8               9     321.3192110  309.39770  3.71%   4.4    0s

Cutting planes:
  Learned: 2
  Gomory: 1
  MIR: 2

Explored 443 nodes (1871 simplex iterations) in 0.11 seconds
Thread count was 2 (of 2 available processors)

Optimal solution found (tolerance 1.00e-04)
Best objective 3.213192110000e+02, best bound 3.213192110000e+02, gap 0.0%
Read MPS format model from file tsp.mps
Reading time = 0.00 seconds
tsp.cmpl: 92 rows, 109 columns, 416 nonzeros
Optimize a model with 92 rows, 109 columns and 416 nonzeros
Presolve time: 0.00s
Presolved: 92 rows, 109 columns, 416 nonzeros
Variable types: 9 continuous, 100 integer (100 binary)
Found heuristic solution: objective 80207.891276

Root relaxation: objective 2.720293e+02, 31 iterations, 0.00 seconds

    Nodes    |    Current Node    |     Objective Bounds      |     Work
 Expl Unexpl |  Obj  Depth IntInf | Incumbent    BestBd   Gap | It/Node Time

     0     0  272.02931    0   18 80207.8913  272.02931   100%     -    0s
     0     0  300.46422    0   16 80207.8913  300.46422   100%     -    0s
     0     0  300.46422    0   16 80207.8913  300.46422   100%     -    0s
*   29     0              21     481.6885330  304.08554  36.9%   5.5    0s
H   48    23                     467.8651610  305.48318  34.7%   5.1    0s
H   63    22                     417.3276670  305.48318  26.8%   4.8    0s
*   86    19              13     370.3807970  305.48318  17.5%   4.5    0s
*  245    42              14     353.8013960  309.39770  12.6%   4.3    0s
*  267     8               9     321.3192110  309.39770  3.71%   4.4    0s

Cutting planes:
  Learned: 2
  Gomory: 1
  MIR: 2

Explored 443 nodes (1871 simplex iterations) in 0.11 seconds
Thread count was 2 (of 2 available processors)

Optimal solution found (tolerance 1.00e-04)
Best objective 3.213192110000e+02, best bound 3.213192110000e+02, gap 0.0%
Read MPS format model from file tsp.mps
Reading time = 0.00 seconds
tsp.cmpl: 92 rows, 109 columns, 416 nonzeros
Optimize a model with 92 rows, 109 columns and 416 nonzeros
Presolve time: 0.00s
Presolved: 92 rows, 109 columns, 416 nonzeros
Variable types: 9 continuous, 100 integer (100 binary)
Found heuristic solution: objective 80207.891276

Root relaxation: objective 2.720293e+02, 31 iterations, 0.00 seconds

    Nodes    |    Current Node    |     Objective Bounds      |     Work
 Expl Unexpl |  Obj  Depth IntInf | Incumbent    BestBd   Gap | It/Node Time

     0     0  272.02931    0   18 80207.8913  272.02931   100%     -    0s
     0     0  300.46422    0   16 80207.8913  300.46422   100%     -    0s
     0     0  300.46422    0   16 80207.8913  300.46422   100%     -    0s
*   29     0              21     481.6885330  304.08554  36.9%   5.5    0s
H   48    23                     467.8651610  305.48318  34.7%   5.1    0s
H   63    22                     417.3276670  305.48318  26.8%   4.8    0s
*   86    19              13     370.3807970  305.48318  17.5%   4.5    0s
*  245    42              14     353.8013960  309.39770  12.6%   4.3    0s
*  267     8               9     321.3192110  309.39770  3.71%   4.4    0s

Cutting planes:
  Learned: 2
  Gomory: 1
  MIR: 2

Explored 443 nodes (1871 simplex iterations) in 0.11 seconds
Thread count was 2 (of 2 available processors)

Optimal solution found (tolerance 1.00e-04)
Best objective 3.213192110000e+02, best bound 3.213192110000e+02, gap 0.0%
Read MPS format model from file tsp.mps
Reading time = 0.00 seconds
tsp.cmpl: 92 rows, 109 columns, 416 nonzeros
Optimize a model with 92 rows, 109 columns and 416 nonzeros
Presolve time: 0.00s
Presolved: 92 rows, 109 columns, 416 nonzeros
Variable types: 9 continuous, 100 integer (100 binary)
Found heuristic solution: objective 80207.891276

Root relaxation: objective 2.720293e+02, 31 iterations, 0.00 seconds

    Nodes    |    Current Node    |     Objective Bounds      |     Work
 Expl Unexpl |  Obj  Depth IntInf | Incumbent    BestBd   Gap | It/Node Time

     0     0  272.02931    0   18 80207.8913  272.02931   100%     -    0s
     0     0  300.46422    0   16 80207.8913  300.46422   100%     -    0s
     0     0  300.46422    0   16 80207.8913  300.46422   100%     -    0s
*   29     0              21     481.6885330  304.08554  36.9%   5.5    0s
H   48    23                     467.8651610  305.48318  34.7%   5.1    0s
H   63    22                     417.3276670  305.48318  26.8%   4.8    0s
*   86    19              13     370.3807970  305.48318  17.5%   4.5    0s
*  245    42              14     353.8013960  309.39770  12.6%   4.3    0s
*  267     8               9     321.3192110  309.39770  3.71%   4.4    0s

Cutting planes:
  Learned: 2
  Gomory: 1
  MIR: 2

Explored 443 nodes (1871 simplex iterations) in 0.11 seconds
Thread count was 2 (of 2 available processors)

Optimal solution found (tolerance 1.00e-04)
Best objective 3.213192110000e+02, best bound 3.213192110000e+02, gap 0.0%
Read MPS format model from file tsp.mps
Reading time = 0.00 seconds
tsp.cmpl: 92 rows, 109 columns, 416 nonzeros
Optimize a model with 92 rows, 109 columns and 416 nonzeros
Presolve time: 0.01s
Presolved: 92 rows, 109 columns, 416 nonzeros
Variable types: 9 continuous, 100 integer (100 binary)
Found heuristic solution: objective 80207.891276

Root relaxation: objective 2.720293e+02, 31 iterations, 0.00 seconds

    Nodes    |    Current Node    |     Objective Bounds      |     Work
 Expl Unexpl |  Obj  Depth IntInf | Incumbent    BestBd   Gap | It/Node Time

     0     0  272.02931    0   18 80207.8913  272.02931   100%     -    0s
     0     0  300.46422    0   16 80207.8913  300.46422   100%     -    0s
     0     0  300.46422    0   16 80207.8913  300.46422   100%     -    0s
*   29     0              21     481.6885330  304.08554  36.9%   5.5    0s
H   48    23                     467.8651610  305.48318  34.7%   5.1    0s
H   63    22                     417.3276670  305.48318  26.8%   4.8    0s
*   86    19              13     370.3807970  305.48318  17.5%   4.5    0s
*  245    42              14     353.8013960  309.39770  12.6%   4.3    0s
*  267     8               9     321.3192110  309.39770  3.71%   4.4    0s

Cutting planes:
  Learned: 2
  Gomory: 1
  MIR: 2

Explored 443 nodes (1871 simplex iterations) in 0.12 seconds
Thread count was 2 (of 2 available processors)

Optimal solution found (tolerance 1.00e-04)
Best objective 3.213192110000e+02, best bound 3.213192110000e+02, gap 0.0%
Read MPS format model from file tsp.mps
Reading time = 0.00 seconds
tsp.cmpl: 92 rows, 109 columns, 416 nonzeros
Optimize a model with 92 rows, 109 columns and 416 nonzeros
Presolve time: 0.00s
Presolved: 92 rows, 109 columns, 416 nonzeros
Variable types: 9 continuous, 100 integer (100 binary)
Found heuristic solution: objective 80207.891276

Root relaxation: objective 2.720293e+02, 31 iterations, 0.00 seconds

    Nodes    |    Current Node    |     Objective Bounds      |     Work
 Expl Unexpl |  Obj  Depth IntInf | Incumbent    BestBd   Gap | It/Node Time

     0     0  272.02931    0   18 80207.8913  272.02931   100%     -    0s
     0     0  300.46422    0   16 80207.8913  300.46422   100%     -    0s
     0     0  300.46422    0   16 80207.8913  300.46422   100%     -    0s
*   29     0              21     481.6885330  304.08554  36.9%   5.5    0s
H   48    23                     467.8651610  305.48318  34.7%   5.1    0s
H   63    22                     417.3276670  305.48318  26.8%   4.8    0s
*   86    19              13     370.3807970  305.48318  17.5%   4.5    0s
*  245    42              14     353.8013960  309.39770  12.6%   4.3    0s
*  267     8               9     321.3192110  309.39770  3.71%   4.4    0s

Cutting planes:
  Learned: 2
  Gomory: 1
  MIR: 2

Explored 443 nodes (1871 simplex iterations) in 0.11 seconds
Thread count was 2 (of 2 available processors)

Optimal solution found (tolerance 1.00e-04)
Best objective 3.213192110000e+02, best bound 3.213192110000e+02, gap 0.0%
Read MPS format model from file tsp.mps
Reading time = 0.00 seconds
tsp.cmpl: 92 rows, 109 columns, 416 nonzeros
Optimize a model with 92 rows, 109 columns and 416 nonzeros
Presolve time: 0.00s
Presolved: 92 rows, 109 columns, 416 nonzeros
Variable types: 9 continuous, 100 integer (100 binary)
Found heuristic solution: objective 80207.891276

Root relaxation: objective 2.720293e+02, 31 iterations, 0.00 seconds

    Nodes    |    Current Node    |     Objective Bounds      |     Work
 Expl Unexpl |  Obj  Depth IntInf | Incumbent    BestBd   Gap | It/Node Time

     0     0  272.02931    0   18 80207.8913  272.02931   100%     -    0s
     0     0  300.46422    0   16 80207.8913  300.46422   100%     -    0s
     0     0  300.46422    0   16 80207.8913  300.46422   100%     -    0s
*   29     0              21     481.6885330  304.08554  36.9%   5.5    0s
H   48    23                     467.8651610  305.48318  34.7%   5.1    0s
H   63    22                     417.3276670  305.48318  26.8%   4.8    0s
*   86    19              13     370.3807970  305.48318  17.5%   4.5    0s
*  245    42              14     353.8013960  309.39770  12.6%   4.3    0s
*  267     8               9     321.3192110  309.39770  3.71%   4.4    0s

Cutting planes:
  Learned: 2
  Gomory: 1
  MIR: 2

Explored 443 nodes (1871 simplex iterations) in 0.11 seconds
Thread count was 2 (of 2 available processors)

Optimal solution found (tolerance 1.00e-04)
Best objective 3.213192110000e+02, best bound 3.213192110000e+02, gap 0.0%
Read MPS format model from file tsp.mps
Reading time = 0.00 seconds
tsp.cmpl: 92 rows, 109 columns, 416 nonzeros
Optimize a model with 92 rows, 109 columns and 416 nonzeros
Presolve time: 0.00s
Presolved: 92 rows, 109 columns, 416 nonzeros
Variable types: 9 continuous, 100 integer (100 binary)
Found heuristic solution: objective 80207.891276

Root relaxation: objective 2.720293e+02, 31 iterations, 0.00 seconds

    Nodes    |    Current Node    |     Objective Bounds      |     Work
 Expl Unexpl |  Obj  Depth IntInf | Incumbent    BestBd   Gap | It/Node Time

     0     0  272.02931    0   18 80207.8913  272.02931   100%     -    0s
     0     0  300.46422    0   16 80207.8913  300.46422   100%     -    0s
     0     0  300.46422    0   16 80207.8913  300.46422   100%     -    0s
*   29     0              21     481.6885330  304.08554  36.9%   5.5    0s
H   48    23                     467.8651610  305.48318  34.7%   5.1    0s
H   63    22                     417.3276670  305.48318  26.8%   4.8    0s
*   86    19              13     370.3807970  305.48318  17.5%   4.5    0s
*  245    42              14     353.8013960  309.39770  12.6%   4.3    0s
*  267     8               9     321.3192110  309.39770  3.71%   4.4    0s

Cutting planes:
  Learned: 2
  Gomory: 1
  MIR: 2

Explored 443 nodes (1871 simplex iterations) in 0.12 seconds
Thread count was 2 (of 2 available processors)

Optimal solution found (tolerance 1.00e-04)
Best objective 3.213192110000e+02, best bound 3.213192110000e+02, gap 0.0%
Read MPS format model from file tsp.mps
Reading time = 0.00 seconds
tsp.cmpl: 92 rows, 109 columns, 416 nonzeros
Optimize a model with 92 rows, 109 columns and 416 nonzeros
Presolve time: 0.00s
Presolved: 92 rows, 109 columns, 416 nonzeros
Variable types: 9 continuous, 100 integer (100 binary)
Found heuristic solution: objective 80207.891276

Root relaxation: objective 2.720293e+02, 31 iterations, 0.00 seconds

    Nodes    |    Current Node    |     Objective Bounds      |     Work
 Expl Unexpl |  Obj  Depth IntInf | Incumbent    BestBd   Gap | It/Node Time

     0     0  272.02931    0   18 80207.8913  272.02931   100%     -    0s
     0     0  300.46422    0   16 80207.8913  300.46422   100%     -    0s
     0     0  300.46422    0   16 80207.8913  300.46422   100%     -    0s
*   29     0              21     481.6885330  304.08554  36.9%   5.5    0s
H   48    23                     467.8651610  305.48318  34.7%   5.1    0s
H   63    22                     417.3276670  305.48318  26.8%   4.8    0s
*   86    19              13     370.3807970  305.48318  17.5%   4.5    0s
*  245    42              14     353.8013960  309.39770  12.6%   4.3    0s
*  267     8               9     321.3192110  309.39770  3.71%   4.4    0s

Cutting planes:
  Learned: 2
  Gomory: 1
  MIR: 2

Explored 443 nodes (1871 simplex iterations) in 0.11 seconds
Thread count was 2 (of 2 available processors)

Optimal solution found (tolerance 1.00e-04)
Best objective 3.213192110000e+02, best bound 3.213192110000e+02, gap 0.0%
Read MPS format model from file tsp.mps
Reading time = 0.00 seconds
tsp.cmpl: 92 rows, 109 columns, 416 nonzeros
Optimize a model with 92 rows, 109 columns and 416 nonzeros
Presolve time: 0.00s
Presolved: 92 rows, 109 columns, 416 nonzeros
Variable types: 9 continuous, 100 integer (100 binary)
Found heuristic solution: objective 80207.891276

Root relaxation: objective 2.720293e+02, 31 iterations, 0.00 seconds

    Nodes    |    Current Node    |     Objective Bounds      |     Work
 Expl Unexpl |  Obj  Depth IntInf | Incumbent    BestBd   Gap | It/Node Time

     0     0  272.02931    0   18 80207.8913  272.02931   100%     -    0s
     0     0  300.46422    0   16 80207.8913  300.46422   100%     -    0s
     0     0  300.46422    0   16 80207.8913  300.46422   100%     -    0s
*   29     0              21     481.6885330  304.08554  36.9%   5.5    0s
H   48    23                     467.8651610  305.48318  34.7%   5.1    0s
H   63    22                     417.3276670  305.48318  26.8%   4.8    0s
*   86    19              13     370.3807970  305.48318  17.5%   4.5    0s
*  245    42              14     353.8013960  309.39770  12.6%   4.3    0s
*  267     8               9     321.3192110  309.39770  3.71%   4.4    0s

Cutting planes:
  Learned: 2
  Gomory: 1
  MIR: 2

Explored 443 nodes (1871 simplex iterations) in 0.10 seconds
Thread count was 2 (of 2 available processors)

Optimal solution found (tolerance 1.00e-04)
Best objective 3.213192110000e+02, best bound 3.213192110000e+02, gap 0.0%
Read MPS format model from file tsp.mps
Reading time = 0.00 seconds
tsp.cmpl: 4 rows, 4 columns, 8 nonzeros
Optimize a model with 4 rows, 4 columns and 8 nonzeros
Presolve removed 4 rows and 4 columns
Presolve time: 0.00s

Explored 0 nodes (0 simplex iterations) in 0.00 seconds
Thread count was 1 (of 2 available processors)

Optimal solution found (tolerance 1.00e-04)
Best objective 1.512131820000e+02, best bound 1.512131820000e+02, gap 0.0%
Read MPS format model from file tsp.mps
Reading time = 0.00 seconds
tsp.cmpl: 14 rows, 19 columns, 50 nonzeros
Optimize a model with 14 rows, 19 columns and 50 nonzeros
Presolve time: 0.00s
Presolved: 14 rows, 19 columns, 50 nonzeros
Variable types: 3 continuous, 16 integer (16 binary)
Found heuristic solution: objective 20149.213182
Found heuristic solution: objective 287.6427860
Found heuristic solution: objective 282.6427860

Root relaxation: objective 2.300986e+02, 9 iterations, 0.00 seconds

    Nodes    |    Current Node    |     Objective Bounds      |     Work
 Expl Unexpl |  Obj  Depth IntInf | Incumbent    BestBd   Gap | It/Node Time

     0     0  230.09856    0    4  282.64279  230.09856  18.6%     -    0s
*    0     0               0     239.7474700  239.74747   0.0%     -    0s

Cutting planes:
  Learned: 1
  MIR: 2

Explored 0 nodes (12 simplex iterations) in 0.01 seconds
Thread count was 2 (of 2 available processors)

Optimal solution found (tolerance 1.00e-04)
Best objective 2.397474700000e+02, best bound 2.397474700000e+02, gap 0.0%
Read MPS format model from file tsp.mps
Reading time = 0.00 seconds
tsp.cmpl: 14 rows, 19 columns, 50 nonzeros
Optimize a model with 14 rows, 19 columns and 50 nonzeros
Presolve time: 0.00s
Presolved: 14 rows, 19 columns, 50 nonzeros
Variable types: 3 continuous, 16 integer (16 binary)
Found heuristic solution: objective 20149.213182
Found heuristic solution: objective 287.6427860
Found heuristic solution: objective 282.6427860

Root relaxation: objective 2.300986e+02, 9 iterations, 0.00 seconds

    Nodes    |    Current Node    |     Objective Bounds      |     Work
 Expl Unexpl |  Obj  Depth IntInf | Incumbent    BestBd   Gap | It/Node Time

     0     0  230.09856    0    4  282.64279  230.09856  18.6%     -    0s
*    0     0               0     239.7474700  239.74747   0.0%     -    0s

Cutting planes:
  Learned: 1
  MIR: 2

Explored 0 nodes (12 simplex iterations) in 0.00 seconds
Thread count was 2 (of 2 available processors)

Optimal solution found (tolerance 1.00e-04)
Best objective 2.397474700000e+02, best bound 2.397474700000e+02, gap 0.0%
Read MPS format model from file tsp.mps
Reading time = 0.00 seconds
tsp.cmpl: 14 rows, 19 columns, 50 nonzeros
Optimize a model with 14 rows, 19 columns and 50 nonzeros
Presolve time: 0.00s
Presolved: 14 rows, 19 columns, 50 nonzeros
Variable types: 3 continuous, 16 integer (16 binary)
Found heuristic solution: objective 20149.213182
Found heuristic solution: objective 287.6427860
Found heuristic solution: objective 282.6427860

Root relaxation: objective 2.300986e+02, 9 iterations, 0.00 seconds

    Nodes    |    Current Node    |     Objective Bounds      |     Work
 Expl Unexpl |  Obj  Depth IntInf | Incumbent    BestBd   Gap | It/Node Time

     0     0  230.09856    0    4  282.64279  230.09856  18.6%     -    0s
*    0     0               0     239.7474700  239.74747   0.0%     -    0s

Cutting planes:
  Learned: 1
  MIR: 2

Explored 0 nodes (12 simplex iterations) in 0.00 seconds
Thread count was 2 (of 2 available processors)

Optimal solution found (tolerance 1.00e-04)
Best objective 2.397474700000e+02, best bound 2.397474700000e+02, gap 0.0%
Read MPS format model from file tsp.mps
Reading time = 0.00 seconds
tsp.cmpl: 14 rows, 19 columns, 50 nonzeros
Optimize a model with 14 rows, 19 columns and 50 nonzeros
Presolve time: 0.00s
Presolved: 14 rows, 19 columns, 50 nonzeros
Variable types: 3 continuous, 16 integer (16 binary)
Found heuristic solution: objective 20149.213182
Found heuristic solution: objective 287.6427860
Found heuristic solution: objective 282.6427860

Root relaxation: objective 2.300986e+02, 9 iterations, 0.00 seconds

    Nodes    |    Current Node    |     Objective Bounds      |     Work
 Expl Unexpl |  Obj  Depth IntInf | Incumbent    BestBd   Gap | It/Node Time

     0     0  230.09856    0    4  282.64279  230.09856  18.6%     -    0s
*    0     0               0     239.7474700  239.74747   0.0%     -    0s

Cutting planes:
  Learned: 1
  MIR: 2

Explored 0 nodes (12 simplex iterations) in 0.01 seconds
Thread count was 2 (of 2 available processors)

Optimal solution found (tolerance 1.00e-04)
Best objective 2.397474700000e+02, best bound 2.397474700000e+02, gap 0.0%
Read MPS format model from file tsp.mps
Reading time = 0.00 seconds
tsp.cmpl: 14 rows, 19 columns, 50 nonzeros
Optimize a model with 14 rows, 19 columns and 50 nonzeros
Presolve time: 0.00s
Presolved: 14 rows, 19 columns, 50 nonzeros
Variable types: 3 continuous, 16 integer (16 binary)
Found heuristic solution: objective 20149.213182
Found heuristic solution: objective 287.6427860
Found heuristic solution: objective 282.6427860

Root relaxation: objective 2.300986e+02, 9 iterations, 0.00 seconds

    Nodes    |    Current Node    |     Objective Bounds      |     Work
 Expl Unexpl |  Obj  Depth IntInf | Incumbent    BestBd   Gap | It/Node Time

     0     0  230.09856    0    4  282.64279  230.09856  18.6%     -    0s
*    0     0               0     239.7474700  239.74747   0.0%     -    0s

Cutting planes:
  Learned: 1
  MIR: 2

Explored 0 nodes (12 simplex iterations) in 0.00 seconds
Thread count was 2 (of 2 available processors)

Optimal solution found (tolerance 1.00e-04)
Best objective 2.397474700000e+02, best bound 2.397474700000e+02, gap 0.0%
Read MPS format model from file tsp.mps
Reading time = 0.00 seconds
tsp.cmpl: 14 rows, 19 columns, 50 nonzeros
Optimize a model with 14 rows, 19 columns and 50 nonzeros
Presolve time: 0.00s
Presolved: 14 rows, 19 columns, 50 nonzeros
Variable types: 3 continuous, 16 integer (16 binary)
Found heuristic solution: objective 20149.213182
Found heuristic solution: objective 287.6427860
Found heuristic solution: objective 282.6427860

Root relaxation: objective 2.300986e+02, 9 iterations, 0.00 seconds

    Nodes    |    Current Node    |     Objective Bounds      |     Work
 Expl Unexpl |  Obj  Depth IntInf | Incumbent    BestBd   Gap | It/Node Time

     0     0  230.09856    0    4  282.64279  230.09856  18.6%     -    0s
*    0     0               0     239.7474700  239.74747   0.0%     -    0s

Cutting planes:
  Learned: 1
  MIR: 2

Explored 0 nodes (12 simplex iterations) in 0.00 seconds
Thread count was 2 (of 2 available processors)

Optimal solution found (tolerance 1.00e-04)
Best objective 2.397474700000e+02, best bound 2.397474700000e+02, gap 0.0%
Read MPS format model from file tsp.mps
Reading time = 0.00 seconds
tsp.cmpl: 14 rows, 19 columns, 50 nonzeros
Optimize a model with 14 rows, 19 columns and 50 nonzeros
Presolve time: 0.00s
Presolved: 14 rows, 19 columns, 50 nonzeros
Variable types: 3 continuous, 16 integer (16 binary)
Found heuristic solution: objective 20149.213182
Found heuristic solution: objective 287.6427860
Found heuristic solution: objective 282.6427860

Root relaxation: objective 2.300986e+02, 9 iterations, 0.00 seconds

    Nodes    |    Current Node    |     Objective Bounds      |     Work
 Expl Unexpl |  Obj  Depth IntInf | Incumbent    BestBd   Gap | It/Node Time

     0     0  230.09856    0    4  282.64279  230.09856  18.6%     -    0s
*    0     0               0     239.7474700  239.74747   0.0%     -    0s

Cutting planes:
  Learned: 1
  MIR: 2

Explored 0 nodes (12 simplex iterations) in 0.00 seconds
Thread count was 2 (of 2 available processors)

Optimal solution found (tolerance 1.00e-04)
Best objective 2.397474700000e+02, best bound 2.397474700000e+02, gap 0.0%
Read MPS format model from file tsp.mps
Reading time = 0.00 seconds
tsp.cmpl: 14 rows, 19 columns, 50 nonzeros
Optimize a model with 14 rows, 19 columns and 50 nonzeros
Presolve time: 0.00s
Presolved: 14 rows, 19 columns, 50 nonzeros
Variable types: 3 continuous, 16 integer (16 binary)
Found heuristic solution: objective 20149.213182
Found heuristic solution: objective 287.6427860
Found heuristic solution: objective 282.6427860

Root relaxation: objective 2.300986e+02, 9 iterations, 0.00 seconds

    Nodes    |    Current Node    |     Objective Bounds      |     Work
 Expl Unexpl |  Obj  Depth IntInf | Incumbent    BestBd   Gap | It/Node Time

     0     0  230.09856    0    4  282.64279  230.09856  18.6%     -    0s
*    0     0               0     239.7474700  239.74747   0.0%     -    0s

Cutting planes:
  Learned: 1
  MIR: 2

Explored 0 nodes (12 simplex iterations) in 0.01 seconds
Thread count was 2 (of 2 available processors)

Optimal solution found (tolerance 1.00e-04)
Best objective 2.397474700000e+02, best bound 2.397474700000e+02, gap 0.0%
Read MPS format model from file tsp.mps
Reading time = 0.00 seconds
tsp.cmpl: 14 rows, 19 columns, 50 nonzeros
Optimize a model with 14 rows, 19 columns and 50 nonzeros
Presolve time: 0.00s
Presolved: 14 rows, 19 columns, 50 nonzeros
Variable types: 3 continuous, 16 integer (16 binary)
Found heuristic solution: objective 20149.213182
Found heuristic solution: objective 287.6427860
Found heuristic solution: objective 282.6427860

Root relaxation: objective 2.300986e+02, 9 iterations, 0.00 seconds

    Nodes    |    Current Node    |     Objective Bounds      |     Work
 Expl Unexpl |  Obj  Depth IntInf | Incumbent    BestBd   Gap | It/Node Time

     0     0  230.09856    0    4  282.64279  230.09856  18.6%     -    0s
*    0     0               0     239.7474700  239.74747   0.0%     -    0s

Cutting planes:
  Learned: 1
  MIR: 2

Explored 0 nodes (12 simplex iterations) in 0.00 seconds
Thread count was 2 (of 2 available processors)

Optimal solution found (tolerance 1.00e-04)
Best objective 2.397474700000e+02, best bound 2.397474700000e+02, gap 0.0%
Read MPS format model from file tsp.mps
Reading time = 0.00 seconds
tsp.cmpl: 14 rows, 19 columns, 50 nonzeros
Optimize a model with 14 rows, 19 columns and 50 nonzeros
Presolve time: 0.00s
Presolved: 14 rows, 19 columns, 50 nonzeros
Variable types: 3 continuous, 16 integer (16 binary)
Found heuristic solution: objective 20149.213182
Found heuristic solution: objective 287.6427860
Found heuristic solution: objective 282.6427860

Root relaxation: objective 2.300986e+02, 9 iterations, 0.00 seconds

    Nodes    |    Current Node    |     Objective Bounds      |     Work
 Expl Unexpl |  Obj  Depth IntInf | Incumbent    BestBd   Gap | It/Node Time

     0     0  230.09856    0    4  282.64279  230.09856  18.6%     -    0s
*    0     0               0     239.7474700  239.74747   0.0%     -    0s

Cutting planes:
  Learned: 1
  MIR: 2

Explored 0 nodes (12 simplex iterations) in 0.01 seconds
Thread count was 2 (of 2 available processors)

Optimal solution found (tolerance 1.00e-04)
Best objective 2.397474700000e+02, best bound 2.397474700000e+02, gap 0.0%
Read MPS format model from file tsp.mps
Reading time = 0.00 seconds
tsp.cmpl: 14 rows, 19 columns, 50 nonzeros
Optimize a model with 14 rows, 19 columns and 50 nonzeros
Presolve time: 0.00s
Presolved: 14 rows, 19 columns, 50 nonzeros
Variable types: 3 continuous, 16 integer (16 binary)
Found heuristic solution: objective 20149.213182
Found heuristic solution: objective 287.6427860
Found heuristic solution: objective 282.6427860

Root relaxation: objective 2.300986e+02, 9 iterations, 0.00 seconds

    Nodes    |    Current Node    |     Objective Bounds      |     Work
 Expl Unexpl |  Obj  Depth IntInf | Incumbent    BestBd   Gap | It/Node Time

     0     0  230.09856    0    4  282.64279  230.09856  18.6%     -    0s
*    0     0               0     239.7474700  239.74747   0.0%     -    0s

Cutting planes:
  Learned: 1
  MIR: 2

Explored 0 nodes (12 simplex iterations) in 0.00 seconds
Thread count was 2 (of 2 available processors)

Optimal solution found (tolerance 1.00e-04)
Best objective 2.397474700000e+02, best bound 2.397474700000e+02, gap 0.0%
Read MPS format model from file tsp.mps
Reading time = 0.00 seconds
tsp.cmpl: 14 rows, 19 columns, 50 nonzeros
Optimize a model with 14 rows, 19 columns and 50 nonzeros
Presolve time: 0.00s
Presolved: 14 rows, 19 columns, 50 nonzeros
Variable types: 3 continuous, 16 integer (16 binary)
Found heuristic solution: objective 20149.213182
Found heuristic solution: objective 287.6427860
Found heuristic solution: objective 282.6427860

Root relaxation: objective 2.300986e+02, 9 iterations, 0.00 seconds

    Nodes    |    Current Node    |     Objective Bounds      |     Work
 Expl Unexpl |  Obj  Depth IntInf | Incumbent    BestBd   Gap | It/Node Time

     0     0  230.09856    0    4  282.64279  230.09856  18.6%     -    0s
*    0     0               0     239.7474700  239.74747   0.0%     -    0s

Cutting planes:
  Learned: 1
  MIR: 2

Explored 0 nodes (12 simplex iterations) in 0.01 seconds
Thread count was 2 (of 2 available processors)

Optimal solution found (tolerance 1.00e-04)
Best objective 2.397474700000e+02, best bound 2.397474700000e+02, gap 0.0%
Read MPS format model from file tsp.mps
Reading time = 0.00 seconds
tsp.cmpl: 14 rows, 19 columns, 50 nonzeros
Optimize a model with 14 rows, 19 columns and 50 nonzeros
Presolve time: 0.00s
Presolved: 14 rows, 19 columns, 50 nonzeros
Variable types: 3 continuous, 16 integer (16 binary)
Found heuristic solution: objective 20149.213182
Found heuristic solution: objective 287.6427860
Found heuristic solution: objective 282.6427860

Root relaxation: objective 2.300986e+02, 9 iterations, 0.00 seconds

    Nodes    |    Current Node    |     Objective Bounds      |     Work
 Expl Unexpl |  Obj  Depth IntInf | Incumbent    BestBd   Gap | It/Node Time

     0     0  230.09856    0    4  282.64279  230.09856  18.6%     -    0s
*    0     0               0     239.7474700  239.74747   0.0%     -    0s

Cutting planes:
  Learned: 1
  MIR: 2

Explored 0 nodes (12 simplex iterations) in 0.01 seconds
Thread count was 2 (of 2 available processors)

Optimal solution found (tolerance 1.00e-04)
Best objective 2.397474700000e+02, best bound 2.397474700000e+02, gap 0.0%
Read MPS format model from file tsp.mps
Reading time = 0.00 seconds
tsp.cmpl: 14 rows, 19 columns, 50 nonzeros
Optimize a model with 14 rows, 19 columns and 50 nonzeros
Presolve time: 0.00s
Presolved: 14 rows, 19 columns, 50 nonzeros
Variable types: 3 continuous, 16 integer (16 binary)
Found heuristic solution: objective 20149.213182
Found heuristic solution: objective 287.6427860
Found heuristic solution: objective 282.6427860

Root relaxation: objective 2.300986e+02, 9 iterations, 0.00 seconds

    Nodes    |    Current Node    |     Objective Bounds      |     Work
 Expl Unexpl |  Obj  Depth IntInf | Incumbent    BestBd   Gap | It/Node Time

     0     0  230.09856    0    4  282.64279  230.09856  18.6%     -    0s
*    0     0               0     239.7474700  239.74747   0.0%     -    0s

Cutting planes:
  Learned: 1
  MIR: 2

Explored 0 nodes (12 simplex iterations) in 0.01 seconds
Thread count was 2 (of 2 available processors)

Optimal solution found (tolerance 1.00e-04)
Best objective 2.397474700000e+02, best bound 2.397474700000e+02, gap 0.0%
Read MPS format model from file tsp.mps
Reading time = 0.00 seconds
tsp.cmpl: 14 rows, 19 columns, 50 nonzeros
Optimize a model with 14 rows, 19 columns and 50 nonzeros
Presolve time: 0.00s
Presolved: 14 rows, 19 columns, 50 nonzeros
Variable types: 3 continuous, 16 integer (16 binary)
Found heuristic solution: objective 20149.213182
Found heuristic solution: objective 287.6427860
Found heuristic solution: objective 282.6427860

Root relaxation: objective 2.300986e+02, 9 iterations, 0.00 seconds

    Nodes    |    Current Node    |     Objective Bounds      |     Work
 Expl Unexpl |  Obj  Depth IntInf | Incumbent    BestBd   Gap | It/Node Time

     0     0  230.09856    0    4  282.64279  230.09856  18.6%     -    0s
*    0     0               0     239.7474700  239.74747   0.0%     -    0s

Cutting planes:
  Learned: 1
  MIR: 2

Explored 0 nodes (12 simplex iterations) in 0.00 seconds
Thread count was 2 (of 2 available processors)

Optimal solution found (tolerance 1.00e-04)
Best objective 2.397474700000e+02, best bound 2.397474700000e+02, gap 0.0%
Read MPS format model from file tsp.mps
Reading time = 0.00 seconds
tsp.cmpl: 14 rows, 19 columns, 50 nonzeros
Optimize a model with 14 rows, 19 columns and 50 nonzeros
Presolve time: 0.00s
Presolved: 14 rows, 19 columns, 50 nonzeros
Variable types: 3 continuous, 16 integer (16 binary)
Found heuristic solution: objective 20149.213182
Found heuristic solution: objective 287.6427860
Found heuristic solution: objective 282.6427860

Root relaxation: objective 2.300986e+02, 9 iterations, 0.00 seconds

    Nodes    |    Current Node    |     Objective Bounds      |     Work
 Expl Unexpl |  Obj  Depth IntInf | Incumbent    BestBd   Gap | It/Node Time

     0     0  230.09856    0    4  282.64279  230.09856  18.6%     -    0s
*    0     0               0     239.7474700  239.74747   0.0%     -    0s

Cutting planes:
  Learned: 1
  MIR: 2

Explored 0 nodes (12 simplex iterations) in 0.01 seconds
Thread count was 2 (of 2 available processors)

Optimal solution found (tolerance 1.00e-04)
Best objective 2.397474700000e+02, best bound 2.397474700000e+02, gap 0.0%
Read MPS format model from file tsp.mps
Reading time = 0.00 seconds
tsp.cmpl: 14 rows, 19 columns, 50 nonzeros
Optimize a model with 14 rows, 19 columns and 50 nonzeros
Presolve time: 0.00s
Presolved: 14 rows, 19 columns, 50 nonzeros
Variable types: 3 continuous, 16 integer (16 binary)
Found heuristic solution: objective 20149.213182
Found heuristic solution: objective 287.6427860
Found heuristic solution: objective 282.6427860

Root relaxation: objective 2.300986e+02, 9 iterations, 0.00 seconds

    Nodes    |    Current Node    |     Objective Bounds      |     Work
 Expl Unexpl |  Obj  Depth IntInf | Incumbent    BestBd   Gap | It/Node Time

     0     0  230.09856    0    4  282.64279  230.09856  18.6%     -    0s
*    0     0               0     239.7474700  239.74747   0.0%     -    0s

Cutting planes:
  Learned: 1
  MIR: 2

Explored 0 nodes (12 simplex iterations) in 0.01 seconds
Thread count was 2 (of 2 available processors)

Optimal solution found (tolerance 1.00e-04)
Best objective 2.397474700000e+02, best bound 2.397474700000e+02, gap 0.0%
Read MPS format model from file tsp.mps
Reading time = 0.00 seconds
tsp.cmpl: 14 rows, 19 columns, 50 nonzeros
Optimize a model with 14 rows, 19 columns and 50 nonzeros
Presolve time: 0.00s
Presolved: 14 rows, 19 columns, 50 nonzeros
Variable types: 3 continuous, 16 integer (16 binary)
Found heuristic solution: objective 20149.213182
Found heuristic solution: objective 287.6427860
Found heuristic solution: objective 282.6427860

Root relaxation: objective 2.300986e+02, 9 iterations, 0.00 seconds

    Nodes    |    Current Node    |     Objective Bounds      |     Work
 Expl Unexpl |  Obj  Depth IntInf | Incumbent    BestBd   Gap | It/Node Time

     0     0  230.09856    0    4  282.64279  230.09856  18.6%     -    0s
*    0     0               0     239.7474700  239.74747   0.0%     -    0s

Cutting planes:
  Learned: 1
  MIR: 2

Explored 0 nodes (12 simplex iterations) in 0.00 seconds
Thread count was 2 (of 2 available processors)

Optimal solution found (tolerance 1.00e-04)
Best objective 2.397474700000e+02, best bound 2.397474700000e+02, gap 0.0%
Read MPS format model from file tsp.mps
Reading time = 0.00 seconds
tsp.cmpl: 14 rows, 19 columns, 50 nonzeros
Optimize a model with 14 rows, 19 columns and 50 nonzeros
Presolve time: 0.00s
Presolved: 14 rows, 19 columns, 50 nonzeros
Variable types: 3 continuous, 16 integer (16 binary)
Found heuristic solution: objective 20149.213182
Found heuristic solution: objective 287.6427860
Found heuristic solution: objective 282.6427860

Root relaxation: objective 2.300986e+02, 9 iterations, 0.00 seconds

    Nodes    |    Current Node    |     Objective Bounds      |     Work
 Expl Unexpl |  Obj  Depth IntInf | Incumbent    BestBd   Gap | It/Node Time

     0     0  230.09856    0    4  282.64279  230.09856  18.6%     -    0s
*    0     0               0     239.7474700  239.74747   0.0%     -    0s

Cutting planes:
  Learned: 1
  MIR: 2

Explored 0 nodes (12 simplex iterations) in 0.01 seconds
Thread count was 2 (of 2 available processors)

Optimal solution found (tolerance 1.00e-04)
Best objective 2.397474700000e+02, best bound 2.397474700000e+02, gap 0.0%
Read MPS format model from file tsp.mps
Reading time = 0.00 seconds
tsp.cmpl: 14 rows, 19 columns, 50 nonzeros
Optimize a model with 14 rows, 19 columns and 50 nonzeros
Presolve time: 0.00s
Presolved: 14 rows, 19 columns, 50 nonzeros
Variable types: 3 continuous, 16 integer (16 binary)
Found heuristic solution: objective 20149.213182
Found heuristic solution: objective 287.6427860
Found heuristic solution: objective 282.6427860

Root relaxation: objective 2.300986e+02, 9 iterations, 0.00 seconds

    Nodes    |    Current Node    |     Objective Bounds      |     Work
 Expl Unexpl |  Obj  Depth IntInf | Incumbent    BestBd   Gap | It/Node Time

     0     0  230.09856    0    4  282.64279  230.09856  18.6%     -    0s
*    0     0               0     239.7474700  239.74747   0.0%     -    0s

Cutting planes:
  Learned: 1
  MIR: 2

Explored 0 nodes (12 simplex iterations) in 0.00 seconds
Thread count was 2 (of 2 available processors)

Optimal solution found (tolerance 1.00e-04)
Best objective 2.397474700000e+02, best bound 2.397474700000e+02, gap 0.0%
Read MPS format model from file tsp.mps
Reading time = 0.00 seconds
tsp.cmpl: 14 rows, 19 columns, 50 nonzeros
Optimize a model with 14 rows, 19 columns and 50 nonzeros
Presolve time: 0.00s
Presolved: 14 rows, 19 columns, 50 nonzeros
Variable types: 3 continuous, 16 integer (16 binary)
Found heuristic solution: objective 20149.213182
Found heuristic solution: objective 287.6427860
Found heuristic solution: objective 282.6427860

Root relaxation: objective 2.300986e+02, 9 iterations, 0.00 seconds

    Nodes    |    Current Node    |     Objective Bounds      |     Work
 Expl Unexpl |  Obj  Depth IntInf | Incumbent    BestBd   Gap | It/Node Time

     0     0  230.09856    0    4  282.64279  230.09856  18.6%     -    0s
*    0     0               0     239.7474700  239.74747   0.0%     -    0s

Cutting planes:
  Learned: 1
  MIR: 2

Explored 0 nodes (12 simplex iterations) in 0.01 seconds
Thread count was 2 (of 2 available processors)

Optimal solution found (tolerance 1.00e-04)
Best objective 2.397474700000e+02, best bound 2.397474700000e+02, gap 0.0%
Read MPS format model from file tsp.mps
Reading time = 0.00 seconds
tsp.cmpl: 14 rows, 19 columns, 50 nonzeros
Optimize a model with 14 rows, 19 columns and 50 nonzeros
Presolve time: 0.00s
Presolved: 14 rows, 19 columns, 50 nonzeros
Variable types: 3 continuous, 16 integer (16 binary)
Found heuristic solution: objective 20149.213182
Found heuristic solution: objective 287.6427860
Found heuristic solution: objective 282.6427860

Root relaxation: objective 2.300986e+02, 9 iterations, 0.00 seconds

    Nodes    |    Current Node    |     Objective Bounds      |     Work
 Expl Unexpl |  Obj  Depth IntInf | Incumbent    BestBd   Gap | It/Node Time

     0     0  230.09856    0    4  282.64279  230.09856  18.6%     -    0s
*    0     0               0     239.7474700  239.74747   0.0%     -    0s

Cutting planes:
  Learned: 1
  MIR: 2

Explored 0 nodes (12 simplex iterations) in 0.01 seconds
Thread count was 2 (of 2 available processors)

Optimal solution found (tolerance 1.00e-04)
Best objective 2.397474700000e+02, best bound 2.397474700000e+02, gap 0.0%
Read MPS format model from file tsp.mps
Reading time = 0.00 seconds
tsp.cmpl: 14 rows, 19 columns, 50 nonzeros
Optimize a model with 14 rows, 19 columns and 50 nonzeros
Presolve time: 0.00s
Presolved: 14 rows, 19 columns, 50 nonzeros
Variable types: 3 continuous, 16 integer (16 binary)
Found heuristic solution: objective 20149.213182
Found heuristic solution: objective 287.6427860
Found heuristic solution: objective 282.6427860

Root relaxation: objective 2.300986e+02, 9 iterations, 0.00 seconds

    Nodes    |    Current Node    |     Objective Bounds      |     Work
 Expl Unexpl |  Obj  Depth IntInf | Incumbent    BestBd   Gap | It/Node Time

     0     0  230.09856    0    4  282.64279  230.09856  18.6%     -    0s
*    0     0               0     239.7474700  239.74747   0.0%     -    0s

Cutting planes:
  Learned: 1
  MIR: 2

Explored 0 nodes (12 simplex iterations) in 0.00 seconds
Thread count was 2 (of 2 available processors)

Optimal solution found (tolerance 1.00e-04)
Best objective 2.397474700000e+02, best bound 2.397474700000e+02, gap 0.0%
Read MPS format model from file tsp.mps
Reading time = 0.00 seconds
tsp.cmpl: 14 rows, 19 columns, 50 nonzeros
Optimize a model with 14 rows, 19 columns and 50 nonzeros
Presolve time: 0.00s
Presolved: 14 rows, 19 columns, 50 nonzeros
Variable types: 3 continuous, 16 integer (16 binary)
Found heuristic solution: objective 20149.213182
Found heuristic solution: objective 287.6427860
Found heuristic solution: objective 282.6427860

Root relaxation: objective 2.300986e+02, 9 iterations, 0.00 seconds

    Nodes    |    Current Node    |     Objective Bounds      |     Work
 Expl Unexpl |  Obj  Depth IntInf | Incumbent    BestBd   Gap | It/Node Time

     0     0  230.09856    0    4  282.64279  230.09856  18.6%     -    0s
*    0     0               0     239.7474700  239.74747   0.0%     -    0s

Cutting planes:
  Learned: 1
  MIR: 2

Explored 0 nodes (12 simplex iterations) in 0.00 seconds
Thread count was 2 (of 2 available processors)

Optimal solution found (tolerance 1.00e-04)
Best objective 2.397474700000e+02, best bound 2.397474700000e+02, gap 0.0%
Read MPS format model from file tsp.mps
Reading time = 0.00 seconds
tsp.cmpl: 14 rows, 19 columns, 50 nonzeros
Optimize a model with 14 rows, 19 columns and 50 nonzeros
Presolve time: 0.00s
Presolved: 14 rows, 19 columns, 50 nonzeros
Variable types: 3 continuous, 16 integer (16 binary)
Found heuristic solution: objective 20149.213182
Found heuristic solution: objective 287.6427860
Found heuristic solution: objective 282.6427860

Root relaxation: objective 2.300986e+02, 9 iterations, 0.00 seconds

    Nodes    |    Current Node    |     Objective Bounds      |     Work
 Expl Unexpl |  Obj  Depth IntInf | Incumbent    BestBd   Gap | It/Node Time

     0     0  230.09856    0    4  282.64279  230.09856  18.6%     -    0s
*    0     0               0     239.7474700  239.74747   0.0%     -    0s

Cutting planes:
  Learned: 1
  MIR: 2

Explored 0 nodes (12 simplex iterations) in 0.00 seconds
Thread count was 2 (of 2 available processors)

Optimal solution found (tolerance 1.00e-04)
Best objective 2.397474700000e+02, best bound 2.397474700000e+02, gap 0.0%
Read MPS format model from file tsp.mps
Reading time = 0.00 seconds
tsp.cmpl: 14 rows, 19 columns, 50 nonzeros
Optimize a model with 14 rows, 19 columns and 50 nonzeros
Presolve time: 0.00s
Presolved: 14 rows, 19 columns, 50 nonzeros
Variable types: 3 continuous, 16 integer (16 binary)
Found heuristic solution: objective 20149.213182
Found heuristic solution: objective 287.6427860
Found heuristic solution: objective 282.6427860

Root relaxation: objective 2.300986e+02, 9 iterations, 0.00 seconds

    Nodes    |    Current Node    |     Objective Bounds      |     Work
 Expl Unexpl |  Obj  Depth IntInf | Incumbent    BestBd   Gap | It/Node Time

     0     0  230.09856    0    4  282.64279  230.09856  18.6%     -    0s
*    0     0               0     239.7474700  239.74747   0.0%     -    0s

Cutting planes:
  Learned: 1
  MIR: 2

Explored 0 nodes (12 simplex iterations) in 0.01 seconds
Thread count was 2 (of 2 available processors)

Optimal solution found (tolerance 1.00e-04)
Best objective 2.397474700000e+02, best bound 2.397474700000e+02, gap 0.0%
Read MPS format model from file tsp.mps
Reading time = 0.00 seconds
tsp.cmpl: 14 rows, 19 columns, 50 nonzeros
Optimize a model with 14 rows, 19 columns and 50 nonzeros
Presolve time: 0.00s
Presolved: 14 rows, 19 columns, 50 nonzeros
Variable types: 3 continuous, 16 integer (16 binary)
Found heuristic solution: objective 20149.213182
Found heuristic solution: objective 287.6427860
Found heuristic solution: objective 282.6427860

Root relaxation: objective 2.300986e+02, 9 iterations, 0.00 seconds

    Nodes    |    Current Node    |     Objective Bounds      |     Work
 Expl Unexpl |  Obj  Depth IntInf | Incumbent    BestBd   Gap | It/Node Time

     0     0  230.09856    0    4  282.64279  230.09856  18.6%     -    0s
*    0     0               0     239.7474700  239.74747   0.0%     -    0s

Cutting planes:
  Learned: 1
  MIR: 2

Explored 0 nodes (12 simplex iterations) in 0.01 seconds
Thread count was 2 (of 2 available processors)

Optimal solution found (tolerance 1.00e-04)
Best objective 2.397474700000e+02, best bound 2.397474700000e+02, gap 0.0%
Read MPS format model from file tsp.mps
Reading time = 0.00 seconds
tsp.cmpl: 14 rows, 19 columns, 50 nonzeros
Optimize a model with 14 rows, 19 columns and 50 nonzeros
Presolve time: 0.00s
Presolved: 14 rows, 19 columns, 50 nonzeros
Variable types: 3 continuous, 16 integer (16 binary)
Found heuristic solution: objective 20149.213182
Found heuristic solution: objective 287.6427860
Found heuristic solution: objective 282.6427860

Root relaxation: objective 2.300986e+02, 9 iterations, 0.00 seconds

    Nodes    |    Current Node    |     Objective Bounds      |     Work
 Expl Unexpl |  Obj  Depth IntInf | Incumbent    BestBd   Gap | It/Node Time

     0     0  230.09856    0    4  282.64279  230.09856  18.6%     -    0s
*    0     0               0     239.7474700  239.74747   0.0%     -    0s

Cutting planes:
  Learned: 1
  MIR: 2

Explored 0 nodes (12 simplex iterations) in 0.00 seconds
Thread count was 2 (of 2 available processors)

Optimal solution found (tolerance 1.00e-04)
Best objective 2.397474700000e+02, best bound 2.397474700000e+02, gap 0.0%
Read MPS format model from file tsp.mps
Reading time = 0.00 seconds
tsp.cmpl: 14 rows, 19 columns, 50 nonzeros
Optimize a model with 14 rows, 19 columns and 50 nonzeros
Presolve time: 0.00s
Presolved: 14 rows, 19 columns, 50 nonzeros
Variable types: 3 continuous, 16 integer (16 binary)
Found heuristic solution: objective 20149.213182
Found heuristic solution: objective 287.6427860
Found heuristic solution: objective 282.6427860

Root relaxation: objective 2.300986e+02, 9 iterations, 0.00 seconds

    Nodes    |    Current Node    |     Objective Bounds      |     Work
 Expl Unexpl |  Obj  Depth IntInf | Incumbent    BestBd   Gap | It/Node Time

     0     0  230.09856    0    4  282.64279  230.09856  18.6%     -    0s
*    0     0               0     239.7474700  239.74747   0.0%     -    0s

Cutting planes:
  Learned: 1
  MIR: 2

Explored 0 nodes (12 simplex iterations) in 0.00 seconds
Thread count was 2 (of 2 available processors)

Optimal solution found (tolerance 1.00e-04)
Best objective 2.397474700000e+02, best bound 2.397474700000e+02, gap 0.0%
Read MPS format model from file tsp.mps
Reading time = 0.00 seconds
tsp.cmpl: 14 rows, 19 columns, 50 nonzeros
Optimize a model with 14 rows, 19 columns and 50 nonzeros
Presolve time: 0.00s
Presolved: 14 rows, 19 columns, 50 nonzeros
Variable types: 3 continuous, 16 integer (16 binary)
Found heuristic solution: objective 20149.213182
Found heuristic solution: objective 287.6427860
Found heuristic solution: objective 282.6427860

Root relaxation: objective 2.300986e+02, 9 iterations, 0.00 seconds

    Nodes    |    Current Node    |     Objective Bounds      |     Work
 Expl Unexpl |  Obj  Depth IntInf | Incumbent    BestBd   Gap | It/Node Time

     0     0  230.09856    0    4  282.64279  230.09856  18.6%     -    0s
*    0     0               0     239.7474700  239.74747   0.0%     -    0s

Cutting planes:
  Learned: 1
  MIR: 2

Explored 0 nodes (12 simplex iterations) in 0.00 seconds
Thread count was 2 (of 2 available processors)

Optimal solution found (tolerance 1.00e-04)
Best objective 2.397474700000e+02, best bound 2.397474700000e+02, gap 0.0%
Read MPS format model from file tsp.mps
Reading time = 0.00 seconds
tsp.cmpl: 14 rows, 19 columns, 50 nonzeros
Optimize a model with 14 rows, 19 columns and 50 nonzeros
Presolve time: 0.00s
Presolved: 14 rows, 19 columns, 50 nonzeros
Variable types: 3 continuous, 16 integer (16 binary)
Found heuristic solution: objective 20149.213182
Found heuristic solution: objective 287.6427860
Found heuristic solution: objective 282.6427860

Root relaxation: objective 2.300986e+02, 9 iterations, 0.00 seconds

    Nodes    |    Current Node    |     Objective Bounds      |     Work
 Expl Unexpl |  Obj  Depth IntInf | Incumbent    BestBd   Gap | It/Node Time

     0     0  230.09856    0    4  282.64279  230.09856  18.6%     -    0s
*    0     0               0     239.7474700  239.74747   0.0%     -    0s

Cutting planes:
  Learned: 1
  MIR: 2

Explored 0 nodes (12 simplex iterations) in 0.00 seconds
Thread count was 2 (of 2 available processors)

Optimal solution found (tolerance 1.00e-04)
Best objective 2.397474700000e+02, best bound 2.397474700000e+02, gap 0.0%
Read MPS format model from file tsp.mps
Reading time = 0.00 seconds
tsp.cmpl: 14 rows, 19 columns, 50 nonzeros
Optimize a model with 14 rows, 19 columns and 50 nonzeros
Presolve time: 0.00s
Presolved: 14 rows, 19 columns, 50 nonzeros
Variable types: 3 continuous, 16 integer (16 binary)
Found heuristic solution: objective 20149.213182
Found heuristic solution: objective 287.6427860
Found heuristic solution: objective 282.6427860

Root relaxation: objective 2.300986e+02, 9 iterations, 0.00 seconds

    Nodes    |    Current Node    |     Objective Bounds      |     Work
 Expl Unexpl |  Obj  Depth IntInf | Incumbent    BestBd   Gap | It/Node Time

     0     0  230.09856    0    4  282.64279  230.09856  18.6%     -    0s
*    0     0               0     239.7474700  239.74747   0.0%     -    0s

Cutting planes:
  Learned: 1
  MIR: 2

Explored 0 nodes (12 simplex iterations) in 0.00 seconds
Thread count was 2 (of 2 available processors)

Optimal solution found (tolerance 1.00e-04)
Best objective 2.397474700000e+02, best bound 2.397474700000e+02, gap 0.0%
Read MPS format model from file tsp.mps
Reading time = 0.00 seconds
tsp.cmpl: 14 rows, 19 columns, 50 nonzeros
Optimize a model with 14 rows, 19 columns and 50 nonzeros
Presolve time: 0.00s
Presolved: 14 rows, 19 columns, 50 nonzeros
Variable types: 3 continuous, 16 integer (16 binary)
Found heuristic solution: objective 20149.213182
Found heuristic solution: objective 287.6427860
Found heuristic solution: objective 282.6427860

Root relaxation: objective 2.300986e+02, 9 iterations, 0.00 seconds

    Nodes    |    Current Node    |     Objective Bounds      |     Work
 Expl Unexpl |  Obj  Depth IntInf | Incumbent    BestBd   Gap | It/Node Time

     0     0  230.09856    0    4  282.64279  230.09856  18.6%     -    0s
*    0     0               0     239.7474700  239.74747   0.0%     -    0s

Cutting planes:
  Learned: 1
  MIR: 2

Explored 0 nodes (12 simplex iterations) in 0.00 seconds
Thread count was 2 (of 2 available processors)

Optimal solution found (tolerance 1.00e-04)
Best objective 2.397474700000e+02, best bound 2.397474700000e+02, gap 0.0%
Read MPS format model from file tsp.mps
Reading time = 0.00 seconds
tsp.cmpl: 14 rows, 19 columns, 50 nonzeros
Optimize a model with 14 rows, 19 columns and 50 nonzeros
Presolve time: 0.00s
Presolved: 14 rows, 19 columns, 50 nonzeros
Variable types: 3 continuous, 16 integer (16 binary)
Found heuristic solution: objective 20149.213182
Found heuristic solution: objective 287.6427860
Found heuristic solution: objective 282.6427860

Root relaxation: objective 2.300986e+02, 9 iterations, 0.00 seconds

    Nodes    |    Current Node    |     Objective Bounds      |     Work
 Expl Unexpl |  Obj  Depth IntInf | Incumbent    BestBd   Gap | It/Node Time

     0     0  230.09856    0    4  282.64279  230.09856  18.6%     -    0s
*    0     0               0     239.7474700  239.74747   0.0%     -    0s

Cutting planes:
  Learned: 1
  MIR: 2

Explored 0 nodes (12 simplex iterations) in 0.00 seconds
Thread count was 2 (of 2 available processors)

Optimal solution found (tolerance 1.00e-04)
Best objective 2.397474700000e+02, best bound 2.397474700000e+02, gap 0.0%
Read MPS format model from file tsp.mps
Reading time = 0.00 seconds
tsp.cmpl: 14 rows, 19 columns, 50 nonzeros
Optimize a model with 14 rows, 19 columns and 50 nonzeros
Presolve time: 0.00s
Presolved: 14 rows, 19 columns, 50 nonzeros
Variable types: 3 continuous, 16 integer (16 binary)
Found heuristic solution: objective 20149.213182
Found heuristic solution: objective 287.6427860
Found heuristic solution: objective 282.6427860

Root relaxation: objective 2.300986e+02, 9 iterations, 0.00 seconds

    Nodes    |    Current Node    |     Objective Bounds      |     Work
 Expl Unexpl |  Obj  Depth IntInf | Incumbent    BestBd   Gap | It/Node Time

     0     0  230.09856    0    4  282.64279  230.09856  18.6%     -    0s
*    0     0               0     239.7474700  239.74747   0.0%     -    0s

Cutting planes:
  Learned: 1
  MIR: 2

Explored 0 nodes (12 simplex iterations) in 0.03 seconds
Thread count was 2 (of 2 available processors)

Optimal solution found (tolerance 1.00e-04)
Best objective 2.397474700000e+02, best bound 2.397474700000e+02, gap 0.0%
Read MPS format model from file tsp.mps
Reading time = 0.00 seconds
tsp.cmpl: 14 rows, 19 columns, 50 nonzeros
Optimize a model with 14 rows, 19 columns and 50 nonzeros
Presolve time: 0.00s
Presolved: 14 rows, 19 columns, 50 nonzeros
Variable types: 3 continuous, 16 integer (16 binary)
Found heuristic solution: objective 20149.213182
Found heuristic solution: objective 287.6427860
Found heuristic solution: objective 282.6427860

Root relaxation: objective 2.300986e+02, 9 iterations, 0.00 seconds

    Nodes    |    Current Node    |     Objective Bounds      |     Work
 Expl Unexpl |  Obj  Depth IntInf | Incumbent    BestBd   Gap | It/Node Time

     0     0  230.09856    0    4  282.64279  230.09856  18.6%     -    0s
*    0     0               0     239.7474700  239.74747   0.0%     -    0s

Cutting planes:
  Learned: 1
  MIR: 2

Explored 0 nodes (12 simplex iterations) in 0.01 seconds
Thread count was 2 (of 2 available processors)

Optimal solution found (tolerance 1.00e-04)
Best objective 2.397474700000e+02, best bound 2.397474700000e+02, gap 0.0%
Read MPS format model from file tsp.mps
Reading time = 0.00 seconds
tsp.cmpl: 14 rows, 19 columns, 50 nonzeros
Optimize a model with 14 rows, 19 columns and 50 nonzeros
Presolve time: 0.00s
Presolved: 14 rows, 19 columns, 50 nonzeros
Variable types: 3 continuous, 16 integer (16 binary)
Found heuristic solution: objective 20149.213182
Found heuristic solution: objective 287.6427860
Found heuristic solution: objective 282.6427860

Root relaxation: objective 2.300986e+02, 9 iterations, 0.00 seconds

    Nodes    |    Current Node    |     Objective Bounds      |     Work
 Expl Unexpl |  Obj  Depth IntInf | Incumbent    BestBd   Gap | It/Node Time

     0     0  230.09856    0    4  282.64279  230.09856  18.6%     -    0s
*    0     0               0     239.7474700  239.74747   0.0%     -    0s

Cutting planes:
  Learned: 1
  MIR: 2

Explored 0 nodes (12 simplex iterations) in 0.00 seconds
Thread count was 2 (of 2 available processors)

Optimal solution found (tolerance 1.00e-04)
Best objective 2.397474700000e+02, best bound 2.397474700000e+02, gap 0.0%
Read MPS format model from file tsp.mps
Reading time = 0.00 seconds
tsp.cmpl: 14 rows, 19 columns, 50 nonzeros
Optimize a model with 14 rows, 19 columns and 50 nonzeros
Presolve time: 0.00s
Presolved: 14 rows, 19 columns, 50 nonzeros
Variable types: 3 continuous, 16 integer (16 binary)
Found heuristic solution: objective 20149.213182
Found heuristic solution: objective 287.6427860
Found heuristic solution: objective 282.6427860

Root relaxation: objective 2.300986e+02, 9 iterations, 0.00 seconds

    Nodes    |    Current Node    |     Objective Bounds      |     Work
 Expl Unexpl |  Obj  Depth IntInf | Incumbent    BestBd   Gap | It/Node Time

     0     0  230.09856    0    4  282.64279  230.09856  18.6%     -    0s
*    0     0               0     239.7474700  239.74747   0.0%     -    0s

Cutting planes:
  Learned: 1
  MIR: 2

Explored 0 nodes (12 simplex iterations) in 0.00 seconds
Thread count was 2 (of 2 available processors)

Optimal solution found (tolerance 1.00e-04)
Best objective 2.397474700000e+02, best bound 2.397474700000e+02, gap 0.0%
Read MPS format model from file tsp.mps
Reading time = 0.00 seconds
tsp.cmpl: 14 rows, 19 columns, 50 nonzeros
Optimize a model with 14 rows, 19 columns and 50 nonzeros
Presolve time: 0.00s
Presolved: 14 rows, 19 columns, 50 nonzeros
Variable types: 3 continuous, 16 integer (16 binary)
Found heuristic solution: objective 20149.213182
Found heuristic solution: objective 287.6427860
Found heuristic solution: objective 282.6427860

Root relaxation: objective 2.300986e+02, 9 iterations, 0.00 seconds

    Nodes    |    Current Node    |     Objective Bounds      |     Work
 Expl Unexpl |  Obj  Depth IntInf | Incumbent    BestBd   Gap | It/Node Time

     0     0  230.09856    0    4  282.64279  230.09856  18.6%     -    0s
*    0     0               0     239.7474700  239.74747   0.0%     -    0s

Cutting planes:
  Learned: 1
  MIR: 2

Explored 0 nodes (12 simplex iterations) in 0.00 seconds
Thread count was 2 (of 2 available processors)

Optimal solution found (tolerance 1.00e-04)
Best objective 2.397474700000e+02, best bound 2.397474700000e+02, gap 0.0%
Read MPS format model from file tsp.mps
Reading time = 0.00 seconds
tsp.cmpl: 14 rows, 19 columns, 50 nonzeros
Optimize a model with 14 rows, 19 columns and 50 nonzeros
Presolve removed 13 rows and 7 columns
Presolve time: 0.00s

Solved in 0 iterations and 0.00 seconds
Infeasible or unbounded model
Read MPS format model from file tsp.mps
Reading time = 0.00 seconds
tsp.cmpl: 14 rows, 19 columns, 50 nonzeros
Optimize a model with 14 rows, 19 columns and 50 nonzeros
Presolve removed 13 rows and 7 columns
Presolve time: 0.00s

Solved in 0 iterations and 0.00 seconds
Infeasible or unbounded model
Read MPS format model from file tsp.mps
Reading time = 0.00 seconds
tsp.cmpl: 14 rows, 19 columns, 50 nonzeros
Optimize a model with 14 rows, 19 columns and 50 nonzeros
Presolve removed 13 rows and 7 columns
Presolve time: 0.00s

Solved in 0 iterations and 0.00 seconds
Infeasible or unbounded model
Read MPS format model from file production-mix.mps
Reading time = 0.00 seconds
production-mix.cmpl: 2 rows, 3 columns, 6 nonzeros
Optimize a model with 2 rows, 3 columns and 6 nonzeros
Presolve removed 0 rows and 1 columns
Presolve time: 0.00s
Presolved: 2 rows, 2 columns, 4 nonzeros

Iteration    Objective       Primal Inf.    Dual Inf.      Time
       0    1.0343822e+04   7.520300e+01   0.000000e+00      0s
       2    6.4482759e+03   0.000000e+00   0.000000e+00      0s

Solved in 2 iterations and 0.00 seconds
Optimal objective  6.448275862e+03
Read MPS format model from file production-mix.mps
Reading time = 0.00 seconds
production-mix.cmpl: 2 rows, 3 columns, 6 nonzeros
Optimize a model with 2 rows, 3 columns and 6 nonzeros
Presolve removed 0 rows and 1 columns
Presolve time: 0.00s
Presolved: 2 rows, 2 columns, 4 nonzeros

Iteration    Objective       Primal Inf.    Dual Inf.      Time
       0    1.0343822e+04   7.520300e+01   0.000000e+00      0s
       2    6.4482759e+03   0.000000e+00   0.000000e+00      0s

Solved in 2 iterations and 0.00 seconds
Optimal objective  6.448275862e+03
Read MPS format model from file production-mix.mps
Reading time = 0.00 seconds
production-mix.cmpl: 2 rows, 3 columns, 6 nonzeros
Optimize a model with 2 rows, 3 columns and 6 nonzeros
Presolve removed 0 rows and 1 columns
Presolve time: 0.00s
Presolved: 2 rows, 2 columns, 4 nonzeros

Iteration    Objective       Primal Inf.    Dual Inf.      Time
       0    1.0343822e+04   7.520300e+01   0.000000e+00      0s
       2    6.4482759e+03   0.000000e+00   0.000000e+00      0s

Solved in 2 iterations and 0.00 seconds
Optimal objective  6.448275862e+03
Read MPS format model from file production-mix.mps
Reading time = 0.00 seconds
production-mix.cmpl: 2 rows, 3 columns, 6 nonzeros
Optimize a model with 2 rows, 3 columns and 6 nonzeros
Presolve removed 0 rows and 1 columns
Presolve time: 0.00s
Presolved: 2 rows, 2 columns, 4 nonzeros

Iteration    Objective       Primal Inf.    Dual Inf.      Time
       0    1.0343822e+04   7.520300e+01   0.000000e+00      0s
       2    6.4482759e+03   0.000000e+00   0.000000e+00      0s

Solved in 2 iterations and 0.00 seconds
Optimal objective  6.448275862e+03
Read MPS format model from file production-mix.mps
Reading time = 0.00 seconds
production-mix.cmpl: 2 rows, 3 columns, 6 nonzeros
Optimize a model with 2 rows, 3 columns and 6 nonzeros
Presolve removed 0 rows and 1 columns
Presolve time: 0.00s
Presolved: 2 rows, 2 columns, 4 nonzeros

Iteration    Objective       Primal Inf.    Dual Inf.      Time
       0    1.0343822e+04   7.520300e+01   0.000000e+00      0s
       2    6.4482759e+03   0.000000e+00   0.000000e+00      0s

Solved in 2 iterations and 0.00 seconds
Optimal objective  6.448275862e+03
Read MPS format model from file production-mix.mps
Reading time = 0.00 seconds
production-mix.cmpl: 2 rows, 3 columns, 6 nonzeros
Optimize a model with 2 rows, 3 columns and 6 nonzeros
Presolve removed 0 rows and 1 columns
Presolve time: 0.00s
Presolved: 2 rows, 2 columns, 4 nonzeros

Iteration    Objective       Primal Inf.    Dual Inf.      Time
       0    1.0343822e+04   7.520300e+01   0.000000e+00      0s
       2    6.4482759e+03   0.000000e+00   0.000000e+00      0s

Solved in 2 iterations and 0.00 seconds
Optimal objective  6.448275862e+03
Read MPS format model from file production-mix.mps
Reading time = 0.00 seconds
production-mix.cmpl: 2 rows, 3 columns, 6 nonzeros
Optimize a model with 2 rows, 3 columns and 6 nonzeros
Presolve removed 0 rows and 1 columns
Presolve time: 0.00s
Presolved: 2 rows, 2 columns, 4 nonzeros

Iteration    Objective       Primal Inf.    Dual Inf.      Time
       0    1.0343822e+04   7.520300e+01   0.000000e+00      0s
       2    6.4482759e+03   0.000000e+00   0.000000e+00      0s

Solved in 2 iterations and 0.00 seconds
Optimal objective  6.448275862e+03
Read MPS format model from file production-mix.mps
Reading time = 0.00 seconds
production-mix.cmpl: 2 rows, 3 columns, 6 nonzeros
Optimize a model with 2 rows, 3 columns and 6 nonzeros
Presolve removed 0 rows and 1 columns
Presolve time: 0.00s
Presolved: 2 rows, 2 columns, 4 nonzeros

Iteration    Objective       Primal Inf.    Dual Inf.      Time
       0    1.0343822e+04   7.520300e+01   0.000000e+00      0s
       2    6.4482759e+03   0.000000e+00   0.000000e+00      0s

Solved in 2 iterations and 0.00 seconds
Optimal objective  6.448275862e+03
Read MPS format model from file production-mix.mps
Reading time = 0.00 seconds
production-mix.cmpl: 2 rows, 3 columns, 6 nonzeros
Optimize a model with 2 rows, 3 columns and 6 nonzeros
Presolve removed 0 rows and 1 columns
Presolve time: 0.00s
Presolved: 2 rows, 2 columns, 4 nonzeros

Iteration    Objective       Primal Inf.    Dual Inf.      Time
       0    1.0343822e+04   7.520300e+01   0.000000e+00      0s
       2    6.4482759e+03   0.000000e+00   0.000000e+00      0s

Solved in 2 iterations and 0.00 seconds
Optimal objective  6.448275862e+03
Read MPS format model from file production-mix.mps
Reading time = 0.00 seconds
production-mix.cmpl: 2 rows, 3 columns, 6 nonzeros
Optimize a model with 2 rows, 3 columns and 6 nonzeros
Presolve removed 0 rows and 1 columns
Presolve time: 0.00s
Presolved: 2 rows, 2 columns, 4 nonzeros

Iteration    Objective       Primal Inf.    Dual Inf.      Time
       0    1.0343822e+04   7.520300e+01   0.000000e+00      0s
       2    6.4482759e+03   0.000000e+00   0.000000e+00      0s

Solved in 2 iterations and 0.00 seconds
Optimal objective  6.448275862e+03
Read MPS format model from file production-mix.mps
Reading time = 0.00 seconds
production-mix.cmpl: 2 rows, 3 columns, 6 nonzeros
Optimize a model with 2 rows, 3 columns and 6 nonzeros
Presolve removed 0 rows and 1 columns
Presolve time: 0.00s
Presolved: 2 rows, 2 columns, 4 nonzeros

Iteration    Objective       Primal Inf.    Dual Inf.      Time
       0    1.0343822e+04   7.520300e+01   0.000000e+00      0s
       2    6.4482759e+03   0.000000e+00   0.000000e+00      0s

Solved in 2 iterations and 0.00 seconds
Optimal objective  6.448275862e+03
Read MPS format model from file production-mix.mps
Reading time = 0.00 seconds
production-mix.cmpl: 2 rows, 3 columns, 6 nonzeros
Optimize a model with 2 rows, 3 columns and 6 nonzeros
Presolve removed 0 rows and 1 columns
Presolve time: 0.00s
Presolved: 2 rows, 2 columns, 4 nonzeros

Iteration    Objective       Primal Inf.    Dual Inf.      Time
       0    1.0343822e+04   7.520300e+01   0.000000e+00      0s
       2    6.4482759e+03   0.000000e+00   0.000000e+00      0s

Solved in 2 iterations and 0.00 seconds
Optimal objective  6.448275862e+03
Read MPS format model from file production-mix.mps
Reading time = 0.00 seconds
production-mix.cmpl: 2 rows, 3 columns, 6 nonzeros
Optimize a model with 2 rows, 3 columns and 6 nonzeros
Presolve removed 0 rows and 1 columns
Presolve time: 0.00s
Presolved: 2 rows, 2 columns, 4 nonzeros

Iteration    Objective       Primal Inf.    Dual Inf.      Time
       0    1.0343822e+04   7.520300e+01   0.000000e+00      0s
       2    6.4482759e+03   0.000000e+00   0.000000e+00      0s

Solved in 2 iterations and 0.00 seconds
Optimal objective  6.448275862e+03
Read MPS format model from file production-mix.mps
Reading time = 0.00 seconds
production-mix.cmpl: 2 rows, 3 columns, 6 nonzeros
Optimize a model with 2 rows, 3 columns and 6 nonzeros
Presolve removed 0 rows and 1 columns
Presolve time: 0.00s
Presolved: 2 rows, 2 columns, 4 nonzeros

Iteration    Objective       Primal Inf.    Dual Inf.      Time
       0    1.0343822e+04   7.520300e+01   0.000000e+00      0s
       2    6.4482759e+03   0.000000e+00   0.000000e+00      0s

Solved in 2 iterations and 0.00 seconds
Optimal objective  6.448275862e+03
Read MPS format model from file production-mix.mps
Reading time = 0.42 seconds
production-mix.cmpl: 2 rows, 3 columns, 6 nonzeros
Optimize a model with 2 rows, 3 columns and 6 nonzeros
Presolve removed 0 rows and 1 columns
Presolve time: 0.00s
Presolved: 2 rows, 2 columns, 4 nonzeros

Iteration    Objective       Primal Inf.    Dual Inf.      Time
       0    1.0343822e+04   7.520300e+01   0.000000e+00      0s
       2    6.4482759e+03   0.000000e+00   0.000000e+00      0s

Solved in 2 iterations and 0.00 seconds
Optimal objective  6.448275862e+03
Read MPS format model from file production-mix.mps
Reading time = 0.00 seconds
production-mix.cmpl: 2 rows, 3 columns, 6 nonzeros
Optimize a model with 2 rows, 3 columns and 6 nonzeros
Presolve removed 0 rows and 1 columns
Presolve time: 0.00s
Presolved: 2 rows, 2 columns, 4 nonzeros

Iteration    Objective       Primal Inf.    Dual Inf.      Time
       0    1.0343822e+04   7.520300e+01   0.000000e+00      0s
       2    6.4482759e+03   0.000000e+00   0.000000e+00      0s

Solved in 2 iterations and 0.00 seconds
Optimal objective  6.448275862e+03
Read MPS format model from file production-mix.mps
Reading time = 0.00 seconds
production-mix.cmpl: 2 rows, 3 columns, 6 nonzeros
Optimize a model with 2 rows, 3 columns and 6 nonzeros
Presolve removed 0 rows and 1 columns
Presolve time: 0.00s
Presolved: 2 rows, 2 columns, 4 nonzeros

Iteration    Objective       Primal Inf.    Dual Inf.      Time
       0    1.0343822e+04   7.520300e+01   0.000000e+00      0s
       2    6.4482759e+03   0.000000e+00   0.000000e+00      0s

Solved in 2 iterations and 0.00 seconds
Optimal objective  6.448275862e+03
Read MPS format model from file production-mix.mps
Reading time = 0.00 seconds
production-mix.cmpl: 2 rows, 3 columns, 6 nonzeros
Optimize a model with 2 rows, 3 columns and 6 nonzeros
Presolve removed 0 rows and 1 columns
Presolve time: 0.00s
Presolved: 2 rows, 2 columns, 4 nonzeros

Iteration    Objective       Primal Inf.    Dual Inf.      Time
       0    1.0343822e+04   7.520300e+01   0.000000e+00      0s
       2    6.4482759e+03   0.000000e+00   0.000000e+00      0s

Solved in 2 iterations and 0.00 seconds
Optimal objective  6.448275862e+03
Read MPS format model from file production-mix.mps
Reading time = 0.00 seconds
production-mix.cmpl: 2 rows, 3 columns, 6 nonzeros
Optimize a model with 2 rows, 3 columns and 6 nonzeros
Presolve removed 0 rows and 1 columns
Presolve time: 0.00s
Presolved: 2 rows, 2 columns, 4 nonzeros

Iteration    Objective       Primal Inf.    Dual Inf.      Time
       0    1.0343822e+04   7.520300e+01   0.000000e+00      0s
       2    6.4482759e+03   0.000000e+00   0.000000e+00      0s

Solved in 2 iterations and 0.00 seconds
Optimal objective  6.448275862e+03
Read MPS format model from file production-mix.mps
Reading time = 0.00 seconds
production-mix.cmpl: 2 rows, 3 columns, 6 nonzeros
Optimize a model with 2 rows, 3 columns and 6 nonzeros
Presolve removed 0 rows and 1 columns
Presolve time: 0.00s
Presolved: 2 rows, 2 columns, 4 nonzeros

Iteration    Objective       Primal Inf.    Dual Inf.      Time
       0    1.0343822e+04   7.520300e+01   0.000000e+00      0s
       2    6.4482759e+03   0.000000e+00   0.000000e+00      0s

Solved in 2 iterations and 0.00 seconds
Optimal objective  6.448275862e+03
Read MPS format model from file production-mix.mps
Reading time = 0.00 seconds
production-mix.cmpl: 2 rows, 3 columns, 6 nonzeros
Optimize a model with 2 rows, 3 columns and 6 nonzeros
Presolve removed 0 rows and 1 columns
Presolve time: 0.00s
Presolved: 2 rows, 2 columns, 4 nonzeros

Iteration    Objective       Primal Inf.    Dual Inf.      Time
       0    1.0343822e+04   7.520300e+01   0.000000e+00      0s
       2    6.4482759e+03   0.000000e+00   0.000000e+00      0s

Solved in 2 iterations and 0.00 seconds
Optimal objective  6.448275862e+03
Read MPS format model from file production-mix.mps
Reading time = 0.00 seconds
production-mix.cmpl: 2 rows, 3 columns, 6 nonzeros
Optimize a model with 2 rows, 3 columns and 6 nonzeros
Presolve removed 0 rows and 1 columns
Presolve time: 0.00s
Presolved: 2 rows, 2 columns, 4 nonzeros

Iteration    Objective       Primal Inf.    Dual Inf.      Time
       0    1.0343822e+04   7.520300e+01   0.000000e+00      0s
       2    6.4482759e+03   0.000000e+00   0.000000e+00      0s

Solved in 2 iterations and 0.00 seconds
Optimal objective  6.448275862e+03
Read MPS format model from file production-mix.mps
Reading time = 0.00 seconds
production-mix.cmpl: 2 rows, 3 columns, 6 nonzeros
Optimize a model with 2 rows, 3 columns and 6 nonzeros
Presolve removed 0 rows and 1 columns
Presolve time: 0.00s
Presolved: 2 rows, 2 columns, 4 nonzeros

Iteration    Objective       Primal Inf.    Dual Inf.      Time
       0    1.0343822e+04   7.520300e+01   0.000000e+00      0s
       2    6.4482759e+03   0.000000e+00   0.000000e+00      0s

Solved in 2 iterations and 0.00 seconds
Optimal objective  6.448275862e+03
Read MPS format model from file production-mix.mps
Reading time = 0.00 seconds
production-mix.cmpl: 2 rows, 3 columns, 6 nonzeros
Optimize a model with 2 rows, 3 columns and 6 nonzeros
Presolve removed 0 rows and 1 columns
Presolve time: 0.00s
Presolved: 2 rows, 2 columns, 4 nonzeros

Iteration    Objective       Primal Inf.    Dual Inf.      Time
       0    1.0343822e+04   7.520300e+01   0.000000e+00      0s
       2    6.4482759e+03   0.000000e+00   0.000000e+00      0s

Solved in 2 iterations and 0.00 seconds
Optimal objective  6.448275862e+03
Read MPS format model from file production-mix.mps
Reading time = 0.00 seconds
production-mix.cmpl: 2 rows, 3 columns, 6 nonzeros
Optimize a model with 2 rows, 3 columns and 6 nonzeros
Presolve removed 0 rows and 1 columns
Presolve time: 0.00s
Presolved: 2 rows, 2 columns, 4 nonzeros

Iteration    Objective       Primal Inf.    Dual Inf.      Time
       0    1.0343822e+04   7.520300e+01   0.000000e+00      0s
       2    6.4482759e+03   0.000000e+00   0.000000e+00      0s

Solved in 2 iterations and 0.00 seconds
Optimal objective  6.448275862e+03
Read MPS format model from file production-mix.mps
Reading time = 0.00 seconds
production-mix.cmpl: 2 rows, 3 columns, 6 nonzeros
Optimize a model with 2 rows, 3 columns and 6 nonzeros
Presolve removed 0 rows and 1 columns
Presolve time: 0.00s
Presolved: 2 rows, 2 columns, 4 nonzeros

Iteration    Objective       Primal Inf.    Dual Inf.      Time
       0    1.0343822e+04   7.520300e+01   0.000000e+00      0s
       2    6.4482759e+03   0.000000e+00   0.000000e+00      0s

Solved in 2 iterations and 0.00 seconds
Optimal objective  6.448275862e+03
Read MPS format model from file production-mix.mps
Reading time = 0.00 seconds
production-mix.cmpl: 2 rows, 3 columns, 6 nonzeros
Optimize a model with 2 rows, 3 columns and 6 nonzeros
Presolve removed 0 rows and 1 columns
Presolve time: 0.00s
Presolved: 2 rows, 2 columns, 4 nonzeros

Iteration    Objective       Primal Inf.    Dual Inf.      Time
       0    1.0343822e+04   7.520300e+01   0.000000e+00      0s
       2    6.4482759e+03   0.000000e+00   0.000000e+00      0s

Solved in 2 iterations and 0.00 seconds
Optimal objective  6.448275862e+03
Read MPS format model from file production-mix.mps
Reading time = 0.00 seconds
production-mix.cmpl: 2 rows, 3 columns, 6 nonzeros
Optimize a model with 2 rows, 3 columns and 6 nonzeros
Presolve removed 0 rows and 1 columns
Presolve time: 0.00s
Presolved: 2 rows, 2 columns, 4 nonzeros

Iteration    Objective       Primal Inf.    Dual Inf.      Time
       0    1.0343822e+04   7.520300e+01   0.000000e+00      0s
       2    6.4482759e+03   0.000000e+00   0.000000e+00      0s

Solved in 2 iterations and 0.00 seconds
Optimal objective  6.448275862e+03
Read MPS format model from file production-mix.mps
Reading time = 0.00 seconds
production-mix.cmpl: 2 rows, 3 columns, 6 nonzeros
Optimize a model with 2 rows, 3 columns and 6 nonzeros
Presolve removed 0 rows and 1 columns
Presolve time: 0.00s
Presolved: 2 rows, 2 columns, 4 nonzeros

Iteration    Objective       Primal Inf.    Dual Inf.      Time
       0    1.0343822e+04   7.520300e+01   0.000000e+00      0s
       2    6.4482759e+03   0.000000e+00   0.000000e+00      0s

Solved in 2 iterations and 0.00 seconds
Optimal objective  6.448275862e+03
Read MPS format model from file production-mix.mps
Reading time = 0.00 seconds
production-mix.cmpl: 2 rows, 3 columns, 6 nonzeros
Optimize a model with 2 rows, 3 columns and 6 nonzeros
Presolve removed 0 rows and 1 columns
Presolve time: 0.00s
Presolved: 2 rows, 2 columns, 4 nonzeros

Iteration    Objective       Primal Inf.    Dual Inf.      Time
       0    1.0343822e+04   7.520300e+01   0.000000e+00      0s
       2    6.4482759e+03   0.000000e+00   0.000000e+00      0s

Solved in 2 iterations and 0.00 seconds
Optimal objective  6.448275862e+03
Read MPS format model from file production-mix.mps
Reading time = 0.00 seconds
production-mix.cmpl: 2 rows, 3 columns, 6 nonzeros
Optimize a model with 2 rows, 3 columns and 6 nonzeros
Presolve removed 0 rows and 1 columns
Presolve time: 0.00s
Presolved: 2 rows, 2 columns, 4 nonzeros

Iteration    Objective       Primal Inf.    Dual Inf.      Time
       0    1.0343822e+04   7.520300e+01   0.000000e+00      0s
       2    6.4482759e+03   0.000000e+00   0.000000e+00      0s

Solved in 2 iterations and 0.00 seconds
Optimal objective  6.448275862e+03
Read MPS format model from file production-mix.mps
Reading time = 0.00 seconds
production-mix.cmpl: 2 rows, 3 columns, 6 nonzeros
Optimize a model with 2 rows, 3 columns and 6 nonzeros
Presolve removed 0 rows and 1 columns
Presolve time: 0.00s
Presolved: 2 rows, 2 columns, 4 nonzeros

Iteration    Objective       Primal Inf.    Dual Inf.      Time
       0    1.0343822e+04   7.520300e+01   0.000000e+00      0s
       2    6.4482759e+03   0.000000e+00   0.000000e+00      0s

Solved in 2 iterations and 0.00 seconds
Optimal objective  6.448275862e+03
Read MPS format model from file production-mix.mps
Reading time = 0.00 seconds
production-mix.cmpl: 2 rows, 3 columns, 6 nonzeros
Optimize a model with 2 rows, 3 columns and 6 nonzeros
Presolve removed 0 rows and 1 columns
Presolve time: 0.00s
Presolved: 2 rows, 2 columns, 4 nonzeros

Iteration    Objective       Primal Inf.    Dual Inf.      Time
       0    1.0343822e+04   7.520300e+01   0.000000e+00      0s
       2    6.4482759e+03   0.000000e+00   0.000000e+00      0s

Solved in 2 iterations and 0.00 seconds
Optimal objective  6.448275862e+03
Read MPS format model from file production-mix.mps
Reading time = 0.00 seconds
production-mix.cmpl: 2 rows, 3 columns, 6 nonzeros
Optimize a model with 2 rows, 3 columns and 6 nonzeros
Presolve removed 0 rows and 1 columns
Presolve time: 0.00s
Presolved: 2 rows, 2 columns, 4 nonzeros

Iteration    Objective       Primal Inf.    Dual Inf.      Time
       0    1.0343822e+04   7.520300e+01   0.000000e+00      0s
       2    6.4482759e+03   0.000000e+00   0.000000e+00      0s

Solved in 2 iterations and 0.00 seconds
Optimal objective  6.448275862e+03
Read MPS format model from file tsp.mps
Reading time = 0.00 seconds
tsp.cmpl: 14 rows, 19 columns, 50 nonzeros
Optimize a model with 14 rows, 19 columns and 50 nonzeros
Presolve removed 13 rows and 7 columns
Presolve time: 0.00s

Solved in 0 iterations and 0.00 seconds
Infeasible or unbounded model
Read MPS format model from file tsp.mps
Reading time = 0.00 seconds
tsp.cmpl: 14 rows, 19 columns, 50 nonzeros
Optimize a model with 14 rows, 19 columns and 50 nonzeros
Presolve removed 13 rows and 7 columns
Presolve time: 0.00s

Solved in 0 iterations and 0.00 seconds
Infeasible or unbounded model
Read MPS format model from file tsp.mps
Reading time = 0.00 seconds
tsp.cmpl: 14 rows, 19 columns, 50 nonzeros
Optimize a model with 14 rows, 19 columns and 50 nonzeros
Presolve removed 13 rows and 7 columns
Presolve time: 0.00s

Solved in 0 iterations and 0.00 seconds
Infeasible or unbounded model
Read MPS format model from file tsp.mps
Reading time = 0.00 seconds
tsp.cmpl: 14 rows, 19 columns, 50 nonzeros
Optimize a model with 14 rows, 19 columns and 50 nonzeros
Presolve removed 13 rows and 7 columns
Presolve time: 0.00s

Solved in 0 iterations and 0.00 seconds
Infeasible or unbounded model
Read MPS format model from file tsp.mps
Reading time = 0.00 seconds
tsp.cmpl: 14 rows, 19 columns, 50 nonzeros
Optimize a model with 14 rows, 19 columns and 50 nonzeros
Presolve removed 13 rows and 7 columns
Presolve time: 0.00s

Solved in 0 iterations and 0.00 seconds
Infeasible or unbounded model
Read MPS format model from file tsp.mps
Reading time = 0.00 seconds
tsp.cmpl: 14 rows, 19 columns, 50 nonzeros
Optimize a model with 14 rows, 19 columns and 50 nonzeros
Presolve removed 13 rows and 7 columns
Presolve time: 0.00s

Solved in 0 iterations and 0.00 seconds
Infeasible or unbounded model
Read MPS format model from file tsp.mps
Reading time = 0.00 seconds
tsp.cmpl: 14 rows, 19 columns, 50 nonzeros
Optimize a model with 14 rows, 19 columns and 50 nonzeros
Presolve removed 13 rows and 7 columns
Presolve time: 0.00s

Solved in 0 iterations and 0.00 seconds
Infeasible or unbounded model
Read MPS format model from file tsp.mps
Reading time = 0.00 seconds
tsp.cmpl: 14 rows, 19 columns, 50 nonzeros
Optimize a model with 14 rows, 19 columns and 50 nonzeros
Presolve removed 13 rows and 7 columns
Presolve time: 0.00s

Solved in 0 iterations and 0.00 seconds
Infeasible or unbounded model
Read MPS format model from file tsp.mps
Reading time = 0.00 seconds
tsp.cmpl: 14 rows, 19 columns, 50 nonzeros
Optimize a model with 14 rows, 19 columns and 50 nonzeros
Presolve removed 13 rows and 7 columns
Presolve time: 0.00s

Solved in 0 iterations and 0.00 seconds
Infeasible or unbounded model
Read MPS format model from file tsp.mps
Reading time = 0.00 seconds
tsp.cmpl: 14 rows, 19 columns, 50 nonzeros
Optimize a model with 14 rows, 19 columns and 50 nonzeros
Presolve removed 13 rows and 7 columns
Presolve time: 0.00s

Solved in 0 iterations and 0.00 seconds
Infeasible or unbounded model
Read MPS format model from file tsp.mps
Reading time = 0.00 seconds
tsp.cmpl: 14 rows, 19 columns, 50 nonzeros
Optimize a model with 14 rows, 19 columns and 50 nonzeros
Presolve removed 13 rows and 7 columns
Presolve time: 0.00s

Solved in 0 iterations and 0.00 seconds
Infeasible or unbounded model
Read MPS format model from file tsp.mps
Reading time = 0.00 seconds
tsp.cmpl: 14 rows, 19 columns, 50 nonzeros
Optimize a model with 14 rows, 19 columns and 50 nonzeros
Presolve removed 13 rows and 7 columns
Presolve time: 0.00s

Solved in 0 iterations and 0.00 seconds
Infeasible or unbounded model
Read MPS format model from file tsp.mps
Reading time = 0.00 seconds
tsp.cmpl: 14 rows, 19 columns, 50 nonzeros
Optimize a model with 14 rows, 19 columns and 50 nonzeros
Presolve removed 13 rows and 7 columns
Presolve time: 0.00s

Solved in 0 iterations and 0.00 seconds
Infeasible or unbounded model
Read MPS format model from file tsp.mps
Reading time = 0.00 seconds
tsp.cmpl: 14 rows, 19 columns, 50 nonzeros
Optimize a model with 14 rows, 19 columns and 50 nonzeros
Presolve time: 0.00s
Presolved: 14 rows, 19 columns, 50 nonzeros
Variable types: 3 continuous, 16 integer (16 binary)
Found heuristic solution: objective 20149.213182
Found heuristic solution: objective 287.6427860
Found heuristic solution: objective 282.6427860

Root relaxation: objective 2.300986e+02, 9 iterations, 0.00 seconds

    Nodes    |    Current Node    |     Objective Bounds      |     Work
 Expl Unexpl |  Obj  Depth IntInf | Incumbent    BestBd   Gap | It/Node Time

     0     0  230.09856    0    4  282.64279  230.09856  18.6%     -    0s
*    0     0               0     239.7474700  239.74747   0.0%     -    0s

Cutting planes:
  Learned: 1
  MIR: 2

Explored 0 nodes (12 simplex iterations) in 0.01 seconds
Thread count was 2 (of 2 available processors)

Optimal solution found (tolerance 1.00e-04)
Best objective 2.397474700000e+02, best bound 2.397474700000e+02, gap 0.0%
Read MPS format model from file tsp.mps
Reading time = 0.00 seconds
tsp.cmpl: 14 rows, 19 columns, 50 nonzeros
Optimize a model with 14 rows, 19 columns and 50 nonzeros
Presolve time: 0.00s
Presolved: 14 rows, 19 columns, 50 nonzeros
Variable types: 3 continuous, 16 integer (16 binary)
Found heuristic solution: objective 20149.213182
Found heuristic solution: objective 287.6427860
Found heuristic solution: objective 282.6427860

Root relaxation: objective 2.300986e+02, 9 iterations, 0.00 seconds

    Nodes    |    Current Node    |     Objective Bounds      |     Work
 Expl Unexpl |  Obj  Depth IntInf | Incumbent    BestBd   Gap | It/Node Time

     0     0  230.09856    0    4  282.64279  230.09856  18.6%     -    0s
*    0     0               0     239.7474700  239.74747   0.0%     -    0s

Cutting planes:
  Learned: 1
  MIR: 2

Explored 0 nodes (12 simplex iterations) in 0.00 seconds
Thread count was 2 (of 2 available processors)

Optimal solution found (tolerance 1.00e-04)
Best objective 2.397474700000e+02, best bound 2.397474700000e+02, gap 0.0%
Read MPS format model from file tsp.mps
Reading time = 0.00 seconds
tsp.cmpl: 14 rows, 19 columns, 50 nonzeros
Optimize a model with 14 rows, 19 columns and 50 nonzeros
Presolve time: 0.00s
Presolved: 14 rows, 19 columns, 50 nonzeros
Variable types: 3 continuous, 16 integer (16 binary)
Found heuristic solution: objective 20149.213182
Found heuristic solution: objective 287.6427860
Found heuristic solution: objective 282.6427860

Root relaxation: objective 2.300986e+02, 9 iterations, 0.00 seconds

    Nodes    |    Current Node    |     Objective Bounds      |     Work
 Expl Unexpl |  Obj  Depth IntInf | Incumbent    BestBd   Gap | It/Node Time

     0     0  230.09856    0    4  282.64279  230.09856  18.6%     -    0s
*    0     0               0     239.7474700  239.74747   0.0%     -    0s

Cutting planes:
  Learned: 1
  MIR: 2

Explored 0 nodes (12 simplex iterations) in 0.01 seconds
Thread count was 2 (of 2 available processors)

Optimal solution found (tolerance 1.00e-04)
Best objective 2.397474700000e+02, best bound 2.397474700000e+02, gap 0.0%
Read MPS format model from file tsp.mps
Reading time = 0.00 seconds
tsp.cmpl: 14 rows, 19 columns, 50 nonzeros
Optimize a model with 14 rows, 19 columns and 50 nonzeros
Presolve time: 0.00s
Presolved: 14 rows, 19 columns, 50 nonzeros
Variable types: 3 continuous, 16 integer (16 binary)
Found heuristic solution: objective 20149.213182
Found heuristic solution: objective 287.6427860
Found heuristic solution: objective 282.6427860

Root relaxation: objective 2.300986e+02, 9 iterations, 0.00 seconds

    Nodes    |    Current Node    |     Objective Bounds      |     Work
 Expl Unexpl |  Obj  Depth IntInf | Incumbent    BestBd   Gap | It/Node Time

     0     0  230.09856    0    4  282.64279  230.09856  18.6%     -    0s
*    0     0               0     239.7474700  239.74747   0.0%     -    0s

Cutting planes:
  Learned: 1
  MIR: 2

Explored 0 nodes (12 simplex iterations) in 0.01 seconds
Thread count was 2 (of 2 available processors)

Optimal solution found (tolerance 1.00e-04)
Best objective 2.397474700000e+02, best bound 2.397474700000e+02, gap 0.0%
Read MPS format model from file tsp.mps
Reading time = 0.00 seconds
tsp.cmpl: 14 rows, 19 columns, 50 nonzeros
Optimize a model with 14 rows, 19 columns and 50 nonzeros
Presolve time: 0.00s
Presolved: 14 rows, 19 columns, 50 nonzeros
Variable types: 3 continuous, 16 integer (16 binary)
Found heuristic solution: objective 20149.213182
Found heuristic solution: objective 287.6427860
Found heuristic solution: objective 282.6427860

Root relaxation: objective 2.300986e+02, 9 iterations, 0.00 seconds

    Nodes    |    Current Node    |     Objective Bounds      |     Work
 Expl Unexpl |  Obj  Depth IntInf | Incumbent    BestBd   Gap | It/Node Time

     0     0  230.09856    0    4  282.64279  230.09856  18.6%     -    0s
*    0     0               0     239.7474700  239.74747   0.0%     -    0s

Cutting planes:
  Learned: 1
  MIR: 2

Explored 0 nodes (12 simplex iterations) in 0.00 seconds
Thread count was 2 (of 2 available processors)

Optimal solution found (tolerance 1.00e-04)
Best objective 2.397474700000e+02, best bound 2.397474700000e+02, gap 0.0%
Read MPS format model from file tsp.mps
Reading time = 0.00 seconds
tsp.cmpl: 14 rows, 19 columns, 50 nonzeros
Optimize a model with 14 rows, 19 columns and 50 nonzeros
Presolve time: 0.00s
Presolved: 14 rows, 19 columns, 50 nonzeros
Variable types: 3 continuous, 16 integer (16 binary)
Found heuristic solution: objective 20149.213182
Found heuristic solution: objective 287.6427860
Found heuristic solution: objective 282.6427860

Root relaxation: objective 2.300986e+02, 9 iterations, 0.00 seconds

    Nodes    |    Current Node    |     Objective Bounds      |     Work
 Expl Unexpl |  Obj  Depth IntInf | Incumbent    BestBd   Gap | It/Node Time

     0     0  230.09856    0    4  282.64279  230.09856  18.6%     -    0s
*    0     0               0     239.7474700  239.74747   0.0%     -    0s

Cutting planes:
  Learned: 1
  MIR: 2

Explored 0 nodes (12 simplex iterations) in 0.01 seconds
Thread count was 2 (of 2 available processors)

Optimal solution found (tolerance 1.00e-04)
Best objective 2.397474700000e+02, best bound 2.397474700000e+02, gap 0.0%
Read MPS format model from file tsp.mps
Reading time = 0.00 seconds
tsp.cmpl: 14 rows, 19 columns, 50 nonzeros
Optimize a model with 14 rows, 19 columns and 50 nonzeros
Presolve time: 0.00s
Presolved: 14 rows, 19 columns, 50 nonzeros
Variable types: 3 continuous, 16 integer (16 binary)
Found heuristic solution: objective 20149.213182
Found heuristic solution: objective 287.6427860
Found heuristic solution: objective 282.6427860

Root relaxation: objective 2.300986e+02, 9 iterations, 0.00 seconds

    Nodes    |    Current Node    |     Objective Bounds      |     Work
 Expl Unexpl |  Obj  Depth IntInf | Incumbent    BestBd   Gap | It/Node Time

     0     0  230.09856    0    4  282.64279  230.09856  18.6%     -    0s
*    0     0               0     239.7474700  239.74747   0.0%     -    0s

Cutting planes:
  Learned: 1
  MIR: 2

Explored 0 nodes (12 simplex iterations) in 0.01 seconds
Thread count was 2 (of 2 available processors)

Optimal solution found (tolerance 1.00e-04)
Best objective 2.397474700000e+02, best bound 2.397474700000e+02, gap 0.0%
Read MPS format model from file tsp.mps
Reading time = 0.00 seconds
tsp.cmpl: 14 rows, 19 columns, 50 nonzeros
Optimize a model with 14 rows, 19 columns and 50 nonzeros
Presolve time: 0.00s
Presolved: 14 rows, 19 columns, 50 nonzeros
Variable types: 3 continuous, 16 integer (16 binary)
Found heuristic solution: objective 20149.213182
Found heuristic solution: objective 287.6427860
Found heuristic solution: objective 282.6427860

Root relaxation: objective 2.300986e+02, 9 iterations, 0.00 seconds

    Nodes    |    Current Node    |     Objective Bounds      |     Work
 Expl Unexpl |  Obj  Depth IntInf | Incumbent    BestBd   Gap | It/Node Time

     0     0  230.09856    0    4  282.64279  230.09856  18.6%     -    0s
*    0     0               0     239.7474700  239.74747   0.0%     -    0s

Cutting planes:
  Learned: 1
  MIR: 2

Explored 0 nodes (12 simplex iterations) in 0.01 seconds
Thread count was 2 (of 2 available processors)

Optimal solution found (tolerance 1.00e-04)
Best objective 2.397474700000e+02, best bound 2.397474700000e+02, gap 0.0%
Read MPS format model from file tsp.mps
Reading time = 0.00 seconds
tsp.cmpl: 14 rows, 19 columns, 50 nonzeros
Optimize a model with 14 rows, 19 columns and 50 nonzeros
Presolve time: 0.00s
Presolved: 14 rows, 19 columns, 50 nonzeros
Variable types: 3 continuous, 16 integer (16 binary)
Found heuristic solution: objective 20149.213182
Found heuristic solution: objective 287.6427860
Found heuristic solution: objective 282.6427860

Root relaxation: objective 2.300986e+02, 9 iterations, 0.00 seconds

    Nodes    |    Current Node    |     Objective Bounds      |     Work
 Expl Unexpl |  Obj  Depth IntInf | Incumbent    BestBd   Gap | It/Node Time

     0     0  230.09856    0    4  282.64279  230.09856  18.6%     -    0s
*    0     0               0     239.7474700  239.74747   0.0%     -    0s

Cutting planes:
  Learned: 1
  MIR: 2

Explored 0 nodes (12 simplex iterations) in 0.00 seconds
Thread count was 2 (of 2 available processors)

Optimal solution found (tolerance 1.00e-04)
Best objective 2.397474700000e+02, best bound 2.397474700000e+02, gap 0.0%
Read MPS format model from file tsp.mps
Reading time = 0.00 seconds
tsp.cmpl: 14 rows, 19 columns, 50 nonzeros
Optimize a model with 14 rows, 19 columns and 50 nonzeros
Presolve time: 0.00s
Presolved: 14 rows, 19 columns, 50 nonzeros
Variable types: 3 continuous, 16 integer (16 binary)
Found heuristic solution: objective 20149.213182
Found heuristic solution: objective 287.6427860
Found heuristic solution: objective 282.6427860

Root relaxation: objective 2.300986e+02, 9 iterations, 0.00 seconds

    Nodes    |    Current Node    |     Objective Bounds      |     Work
 Expl Unexpl |  Obj  Depth IntInf | Incumbent    BestBd   Gap | It/Node Time

     0     0  230.09856    0    4  282.64279  230.09856  18.6%     -    0s
*    0     0               0     239.7474700  239.74747   0.0%     -    0s

Cutting planes:
  Learned: 1
  MIR: 2

Explored 0 nodes (12 simplex iterations) in 0.00 seconds
Thread count was 2 (of 2 available processors)

Optimal solution found (tolerance 1.00e-04)
Best objective 2.397474700000e+02, best bound 2.397474700000e+02, gap 0.0%
Read MPS format model from file tsp.mps
Reading time = 0.00 seconds
tsp.cmpl: 14 rows, 19 columns, 50 nonzeros
Optimize a model with 14 rows, 19 columns and 50 nonzeros
Presolve time: 0.00s
Presolved: 14 rows, 19 columns, 50 nonzeros
Variable types: 3 continuous, 16 integer (16 binary)
Found heuristic solution: objective 20149.213182
Found heuristic solution: objective 287.6427860
Found heuristic solution: objective 282.6427860

Root relaxation: objective 2.300986e+02, 9 iterations, 0.00 seconds

    Nodes    |    Current Node    |     Objective Bounds      |     Work
 Expl Unexpl |  Obj  Depth IntInf | Incumbent    BestBd   Gap | It/Node Time

     0     0  230.09856    0    4  282.64279  230.09856  18.6%     -    0s
*    0     0               0     239.7474700  239.74747   0.0%     -    0s

Cutting planes:
  Learned: 1
  MIR: 2

Explored 0 nodes (12 simplex iterations) in 0.01 seconds
Thread count was 2 (of 2 available processors)

Optimal solution found (tolerance 1.00e-04)
Best objective 2.397474700000e+02, best bound 2.397474700000e+02, gap 0.0%
Read MPS format model from file tsp.mps
Reading time = 0.01 seconds
tsp.cmpl: 14 rows, 19 columns, 50 nonzeros
Optimize a model with 14 rows, 19 columns and 50 nonzeros
Presolve time: 0.01s
Presolved: 14 rows, 19 columns, 50 nonzeros
Variable types: 3 continuous, 16 integer (16 binary)
Found heuristic solution: objective 20149.213182
Found heuristic solution: objective 287.6427860
Found heuristic solution: objective 282.6427860

Root relaxation: objective 2.300986e+02, 9 iterations, 0.00 seconds

    Nodes    |    Current Node    |     Objective Bounds      |     Work
 Expl Unexpl |  Obj  Depth IntInf | Incumbent    BestBd   Gap | It/Node Time

     0     0  230.09856    0    4  282.64279  230.09856  18.6%     -    0s
*    0     0               0     239.7474700  239.74747   0.0%     -    0s

Cutting planes:
  Learned: 1
  MIR: 2

Explored 0 nodes (12 simplex iterations) in 0.04 seconds
Thread count was 2 (of 2 available processors)

Optimal solution found (tolerance 1.00e-04)
Best objective 2.397474700000e+02, best bound 2.397474700000e+02, gap 0.0%
Read MPS format model from file tsp.mps
Reading time = 0.00 seconds
tsp.cmpl: 14 rows, 19 columns, 50 nonzeros
Optimize a model with 14 rows, 19 columns and 50 nonzeros
Presolve time: 0.00s
Presolved: 14 rows, 19 columns, 50 nonzeros
Variable types: 3 continuous, 16 integer (16 binary)
Found heuristic solution: objective 20149.213182
Found heuristic solution: objective 287.6427860
Found heuristic solution: objective 282.6427860

Root relaxation: objective 2.300986e+02, 9 iterations, 0.00 seconds

    Nodes    |    Current Node    |     Objective Bounds      |     Work
 Expl Unexpl |  Obj  Depth IntInf | Incumbent    BestBd   Gap | It/Node Time

     0     0  230.09856    0    4  282.64279  230.09856  18.6%     -    0s
*    0     0               0     239.7474700  239.74747   0.0%     -    0s

Cutting planes:
  Learned: 1
  MIR: 2

Explored 0 nodes (12 simplex iterations) in 0.00 seconds
Thread count was 2 (of 2 available processors)

Optimal solution found (tolerance 1.00e-04)
Best objective 2.397474700000e+02, best bound 2.397474700000e+02, gap 0.0%
Read MPS format model from file tsp.mps
Reading time = 0.00 seconds
tsp.cmpl: 8 rows, 11 columns, 24 nonzeros
Optimize a model with 8 rows, 11 columns and 24 nonzeros
Presolve removed 1 rows and 2 columns
Presolve time: 0.00s
Presolved: 7 rows, 9 columns, 21 nonzeros
Variable types: 0 continuous, 9 integer (9 binary)
Found heuristic solution: objective 10152.062078

Root relaxation: objective 2.483106e+02, 5 iterations, 0.00 seconds

    Nodes    |    Current Node    |     Objective Bounds      |     Work
 Expl Unexpl |  Obj  Depth IntInf | Incumbent    BestBd   Gap | It/Node Time

*    0     0               0     248.3105540  248.31055   0.0%     -    0s

Explored 0 nodes (5 simplex iterations) in 0.00 seconds
Thread count was 2 (of 2 available processors)

Optimal solution found (tolerance 1.00e-04)
Best objective 2.483105540000e+02, best bound 2.483105540000e+02, gap 0.0%
Read MPS format model from file tsp.mps
Reading time = 0.00 seconds
tsp.cmpl: 14 rows, 19 columns, 50 nonzeros
Optimize a model with 14 rows, 19 columns and 50 nonzeros
Presolve time: 0.00s
Presolved: 14 rows, 19 columns, 50 nonzeros
Variable types: 3 continuous, 16 integer (16 binary)
Found heuristic solution: objective 20149.213182
Found heuristic solution: objective 287.6427860
Found heuristic solution: objective 282.6427860

Root relaxation: objective 2.300986e+02, 9 iterations, 0.00 seconds

    Nodes    |    Current Node    |     Objective Bounds      |     Work
 Expl Unexpl |  Obj  Depth IntInf | Incumbent    BestBd   Gap | It/Node Time

     0     0  230.09856    0    4  282.64279  230.09856  18.6%     -    0s
*    0     0               0     239.7474700  239.74747   0.0%     -    0s

Cutting planes:
  Learned: 1
  MIR: 2

Explored 0 nodes (12 simplex iterations) in 0.00 seconds
Thread count was 2 (of 2 available processors)

Optimal solution found (tolerance 1.00e-04)
Best objective 2.397474700000e+02, best bound 2.397474700000e+02, gap 0.0%
Read MPS format model from file tsp.mps
Reading time = 0.00 seconds
tsp.cmpl: 8 rows, 11 columns, 24 nonzeros
Optimize a model with 8 rows, 11 columns and 24 nonzeros
Presolve removed 1 rows and 2 columns
Presolve time: 0.00s
Presolved: 7 rows, 9 columns, 21 nonzeros
Variable types: 0 continuous, 9 integer (9 binary)
Found heuristic solution: objective 10152.062078

Root relaxation: objective 2.483106e+02, 5 iterations, 0.00 seconds

    Nodes    |    Current Node    |     Objective Bounds      |     Work
 Expl Unexpl |  Obj  Depth IntInf | Incumbent    BestBd   Gap | It/Node Time

*    0     0               0     248.3105540  248.31055   0.0%     -    0s

Explored 0 nodes (5 simplex iterations) in 0.00 seconds
Thread count was 2 (of 2 available processors)

Optimal solution found (tolerance 1.00e-04)
Best objective 2.483105540000e+02, best bound 2.483105540000e+02, gap 0.0%
Read MPS format model from file tsp.mps
Reading time = 0.00 seconds
tsp.cmpl: 14 rows, 19 columns, 50 nonzeros
Optimize a model with 14 rows, 19 columns and 50 nonzeros
Presolve time: 0.00s
Presolved: 14 rows, 19 columns, 50 nonzeros
Variable types: 3 continuous, 16 integer (16 binary)
Found heuristic solution: objective 20149.213182
Found heuristic solution: objective 287.6427860
Found heuristic solution: objective 282.6427860

Root relaxation: objective 2.300986e+02, 9 iterations, 0.00 seconds

    Nodes    |    Current Node    |     Objective Bounds      |     Work
 Expl Unexpl |  Obj  Depth IntInf | Incumbent    BestBd   Gap | It/Node Time

     0     0  230.09856    0    4  282.64279  230.09856  18.6%     -    0s
*    0     0               0     239.7474700  239.74747   0.0%     -    0s

Cutting planes:
  Learned: 1
  MIR: 2

Explored 0 nodes (12 simplex iterations) in 0.00 seconds
Thread count was 2 (of 2 available processors)

Optimal solution found (tolerance 1.00e-04)
Best objective 2.397474700000e+02, best bound 2.397474700000e+02, gap 0.0%
Read MPS format model from file tsp.mps
Reading time = 0.00 seconds
tsp.cmpl: 14 rows, 19 columns, 50 nonzeros
Optimize a model with 14 rows, 19 columns and 50 nonzeros
Presolve time: 0.00s
Presolved: 14 rows, 19 columns, 50 nonzeros
Variable types: 3 continuous, 16 integer (16 binary)
Found heuristic solution: objective 20149.213182
Found heuristic solution: objective 287.6427860
Found heuristic solution: objective 282.6427860

Root relaxation: objective 2.300986e+02, 9 iterations, 0.00 seconds

    Nodes    |    Current Node    |     Objective Bounds      |     Work
 Expl Unexpl |  Obj  Depth IntInf | Incumbent    BestBd   Gap | It/Node Time

     0     0  230.09856    0    4  282.64279  230.09856  18.6%     -    0s
*    0     0               0     239.7474700  239.74747   0.0%     -    0s

Cutting planes:
  Learned: 1
  MIR: 2

Explored 0 nodes (12 simplex iterations) in 0.01 seconds
Thread count was 2 (of 2 available processors)

Optimal solution found (tolerance 1.00e-04)
Best objective 2.397474700000e+02, best bound 2.397474700000e+02, gap 0.0%
Read MPS format model from file tsp.mps
Reading time = 0.00 seconds
tsp.cmpl: 14 rows, 19 columns, 50 nonzeros
Optimize a model with 14 rows, 19 columns and 50 nonzeros
Presolve time: 0.00s
Presolved: 14 rows, 19 columns, 50 nonzeros
Variable types: 3 continuous, 16 integer (16 binary)
Found heuristic solution: objective 20149.213182
Found heuristic solution: objective 287.6427860
Found heuristic solution: objective 282.6427860

Root relaxation: objective 2.300986e+02, 9 iterations, 0.00 seconds

    Nodes    |    Current Node    |     Objective Bounds      |     Work
 Expl Unexpl |  Obj  Depth IntInf | Incumbent    BestBd   Gap | It/Node Time

     0     0  230.09856    0    4  282.64279  230.09856  18.6%     -    0s
*    0     0               0     239.7474700  239.74747   0.0%     -    0s

Cutting planes:
  Learned: 1
  MIR: 2

Explored 0 nodes (12 simplex iterations) in 0.01 seconds
Thread count was 2 (of 2 available processors)

Optimal solution found (tolerance 1.00e-04)
Best objective 2.397474700000e+02, best bound 2.397474700000e+02, gap 0.0%
Read MPS format model from file tsp.mps
Reading time = 0.00 seconds
tsp.cmpl: 14 rows, 19 columns, 50 nonzeros
Optimize a model with 14 rows, 19 columns and 50 nonzeros
Presolve time: 0.00s
Presolved: 14 rows, 19 columns, 50 nonzeros
Variable types: 3 continuous, 16 integer (16 binary)
Found heuristic solution: objective 20149.213182
Found heuristic solution: objective 287.6427860
Found heuristic solution: objective 282.6427860

Root relaxation: objective 2.300986e+02, 9 iterations, 0.00 seconds

    Nodes    |    Current Node    |     Objective Bounds      |     Work
 Expl Unexpl |  Obj  Depth IntInf | Incumbent    BestBd   Gap | It/Node Time

     0     0  230.09856    0    4  282.64279  230.09856  18.6%     -    0s
*    0     0               0     239.7474700  239.74747   0.0%     -    0s

Cutting planes:
  Learned: 1
  MIR: 2

Explored 0 nodes (12 simplex iterations) in 0.01 seconds
Thread count was 2 (of 2 available processors)

Optimal solution found (tolerance 1.00e-04)
Best objective 2.397474700000e+02, best bound 2.397474700000e+02, gap 0.0%
Read MPS format model from file tsp.mps
Reading time = 0.00 seconds
tsp.cmpl: 14 rows, 19 columns, 50 nonzeros
Optimize a model with 14 rows, 19 columns and 50 nonzeros
Presolve time: 0.00s
Presolved: 14 rows, 19 columns, 50 nonzeros
Variable types: 3 continuous, 16 integer (16 binary)
Found heuristic solution: objective 20149.213182
Found heuristic solution: objective 287.6427860
Found heuristic solution: objective 282.6427860

Root relaxation: objective 2.300986e+02, 9 iterations, 0.00 seconds

    Nodes    |    Current Node    |     Objective Bounds      |     Work
 Expl Unexpl |  Obj  Depth IntInf | Incumbent    BestBd   Gap | It/Node Time

     0     0  230.09856    0    4  282.64279  230.09856  18.6%     -    0s
*    0     0               0     239.7474700  239.74747   0.0%     -    0s

Cutting planes:
  Learned: 1
  MIR: 2

Explored 0 nodes (12 simplex iterations) in 0.00 seconds
Thread count was 2 (of 2 available processors)

Optimal solution found (tolerance 1.00e-04)
Best objective 2.397474700000e+02, best bound 2.397474700000e+02, gap 0.0%
Read MPS format model from file tsp.mps
Reading time = 0.00 seconds
tsp.cmpl: 14 rows, 19 columns, 50 nonzeros
Optimize a model with 14 rows, 19 columns and 50 nonzeros
Presolve time: 0.00s
Presolved: 14 rows, 19 columns, 50 nonzeros
Variable types: 3 continuous, 16 integer (16 binary)
Found heuristic solution: objective 20149.213182
Found heuristic solution: objective 287.6427860
Found heuristic solution: objective 282.6427860

Root relaxation: objective 2.300986e+02, 9 iterations, 0.00 seconds

    Nodes    |    Current Node    |     Objective Bounds      |     Work
 Expl Unexpl |  Obj  Depth IntInf | Incumbent    BestBd   Gap | It/Node Time

     0     0  230.09856    0    4  282.64279  230.09856  18.6%     -    0s
*    0     0               0     239.7474700  239.74747   0.0%     -    0s

Cutting planes:
  Learned: 1
  MIR: 2

Explored 0 nodes (12 simplex iterations) in 0.00 seconds
Thread count was 2 (of 2 available processors)

Optimal solution found (tolerance 1.00e-04)
Best objective 2.397474700000e+02, best bound 2.397474700000e+02, gap 0.0%
Read MPS format model from file tsp.mps
Reading time = 0.00 seconds
tsp.cmpl: 14 rows, 19 columns, 50 nonzeros
Optimize a model with 14 rows, 19 columns and 50 nonzeros
Presolve time: 0.00s
Presolved: 14 rows, 19 columns, 50 nonzeros
Variable types: 3 continuous, 16 integer (16 binary)
Found heuristic solution: objective 20149.213182
Found heuristic solution: objective 287.6427860
Found heuristic solution: objective 282.6427860

Root relaxation: objective 2.300986e+02, 9 iterations, 0.00 seconds

    Nodes    |    Current Node    |     Objective Bounds      |     Work
 Expl Unexpl |  Obj  Depth IntInf | Incumbent    BestBd   Gap | It/Node Time

     0     0  230.09856    0    4  282.64279  230.09856  18.6%     -    0s
*    0     0               0     239.7474700  239.74747   0.0%     -    0s

Cutting planes:
  Learned: 1
  MIR: 2

Explored 0 nodes (12 simplex iterations) in 0.01 seconds
Thread count was 2 (of 2 available processors)

Optimal solution found (tolerance 1.00e-04)
Best objective 2.397474700000e+02, best bound 2.397474700000e+02, gap 0.0%
Read MPS format model from file tsp.mps
Reading time = 0.00 seconds
tsp.cmpl: 14 rows, 19 columns, 50 nonzeros
Optimize a model with 14 rows, 19 columns and 50 nonzeros
Presolve time: 0.00s
Presolved: 14 rows, 19 columns, 50 nonzeros
Variable types: 3 continuous, 16 integer (16 binary)
Found heuristic solution: objective 20208.806130
Found heuristic solution: objective 233.3220280
Found heuristic solution: objective 231.3220280

Root relaxation: objective 2.214275e+02, 9 iterations, 0.00 seconds

    Nodes    |    Current Node    |     Objective Bounds      |     Work
 Expl Unexpl |  Obj  Depth IntInf | Incumbent    BestBd   Gap | It/Node Time

     0     0  221.42753    0    4  231.32203  221.42753  4.28%     -    0s
     0     0     cutoff    0       231.32203  231.32203   0.0%     -    0s

Cutting planes:
  Learned: 1
  MIR: 1

Explored 0 nodes (10 simplex iterations) in 0.00 seconds
Thread count was 2 (of 2 available processors)

Optimal solution found (tolerance 1.00e-04)
Best objective 2.313220280000e+02, best bound 2.313220280000e+02, gap 0.0%
Read MPS format model from file tsp.mps
Reading time = 0.00 seconds
tsp.cmpl: 14 rows, 19 columns, 50 nonzeros
Optimize a model with 14 rows, 19 columns and 50 nonzeros
Presolve time: 0.00s
Presolved: 14 rows, 19 columns, 50 nonzeros
Variable types: 3 continuous, 16 integer (16 binary)
Found heuristic solution: objective 20107.017856
Found heuristic solution: objective 271.3251780

Root relaxation: objective 1.622384e+02, 11 iterations, 0.00 seconds

    Nodes    |    Current Node    |     Objective Bounds      |     Work
 Expl Unexpl |  Obj  Depth IntInf | Incumbent    BestBd   Gap | It/Node Time

     0     0  162.23841    0    4  271.32518  162.23841  40.2%     -    0s
*    0     0               0     193.7268290  193.72683   0.0%     -    0s

Cutting planes:
  Learned: 1
  MIR: 2

Explored 0 nodes (13 simplex iterations) in 0.00 seconds
Thread count was 2 (of 2 available processors)

Optimal solution found (tolerance 1.00e-04)
Best objective 1.937268290000e+02, best bound 1.937268290000e+02, gap 0.0%
Read MPS format model from file tsp.mps
Reading time = 0.00 seconds
tsp.cmpl: 14 rows, 19 columns, 50 nonzeros
Optimize a model with 14 rows, 19 columns and 50 nonzeros
Presolve time: 0.00s
Presolved: 14 rows, 19 columns, 50 nonzeros
Variable types: 3 continuous, 16 integer (16 binary)
Found heuristic solution: objective 20167.807582
Found heuristic solution: objective 225.1606700

Root relaxation: objective 1.825895e+02, 8 iterations, 0.00 seconds

    Nodes    |    Current Node    |     Objective Bounds      |     Work
 Expl Unexpl |  Obj  Depth IntInf | Incumbent    BestBd   Gap | It/Node Time

     0     0  182.58949    0    4  225.16067  182.58949  18.9%     -    0s
*    0     0               0     192.3714060  192.37141   0.0%     -    0s

Cutting planes:
  Learned: 1
  MIR: 2

Explored 0 nodes (10 simplex iterations) in 0.00 seconds
Thread count was 2 (of 2 available processors)

Optimal solution found (tolerance 1.00e-04)
Best objective 1.923714060000e+02, best bound 1.923714060000e+02, gap 0.0%
Read MPS format model from file tsp.mps
Reading time = 0.00 seconds
tsp.cmpl: 14 rows, 19 columns, 50 nonzeros
Optimize a model with 14 rows, 19 columns and 50 nonzeros
Presolve time: 0.00s
Presolved: 14 rows, 19 columns, 50 nonzeros
Variable types: 3 continuous, 16 integer (16 binary)
Found heuristic solution: objective 20094.868330
Found heuristic solution: objective 258.8678870

Root relaxation: objective 2.162789e+02, 9 iterations, 0.00 seconds

    Nodes    |    Current Node    |     Objective Bounds      |     Work
 Expl Unexpl |  Obj  Depth IntInf | Incumbent    BestBd   Gap | It/Node Time

     0     0  216.27888    0    4  258.86789  216.27888  16.5%     -    0s
*    0     0               0     217.1628610  217.16286   0.0%     -    0s

Cutting planes:
  Learned: 1
  MIR: 2

Explored 0 nodes (11 simplex iterations) in 0.01 seconds
Thread count was 2 (of 2 available processors)

Optimal solution found (tolerance 1.00e-04)
Best objective 2.171628610000e+02, best bound 2.171628610000e+02, gap 0.0%
Read MPS format model from file tsp.mps
Reading time = 0.00 seconds
tsp.cmpl: 14 rows, 19 columns, 50 nonzeros
Optimize a model with 14 rows, 19 columns and 50 nonzeros
Presolve time: 0.00s
Presolved: 14 rows, 19 columns, 50 nonzeros
Variable types: 3 continuous, 16 integer (16 binary)
Found heuristic solution: objective 20046.166378
Found heuristic solution: objective 141.5489510
Found heuristic solution: objective 131.5489510

Root relaxation: objective 1.245772e+02, 10 iterations, 0.00 seconds

    Nodes    |    Current Node    |     Objective Bounds      |     Work
 Expl Unexpl |  Obj  Depth IntInf | Incumbent    BestBd   Gap | It/Node Time

     0     0  124.57724    0    4  131.54895  124.57724  5.30%     -    0s
*    0     0               0     126.9930930  126.99309   0.0%     -    0s

Cutting planes:
  Learned: 1
  Clique: 3
  MIR: 2

Explored 0 nodes (12 simplex iterations) in 0.00 seconds
Thread count was 2 (of 2 available processors)

Optimal solution found (tolerance 1.00e-04)
Best objective 1.269930930000e+02, best bound 1.269930930000e+02, gap 0.0%
Read MPS format model from file tsp.mps
Reading time = 0.00 seconds
tsp.cmpl: 14 rows, 19 columns, 50 nonzeros
Optimize a model with 14 rows, 19 columns and 50 nonzeros
Presolve time: 0.00s
Presolved: 14 rows, 19 columns, 50 nonzeros
Variable types: 3 continuous, 16 integer (16 binary)
Found heuristic solution: objective 20152.155766
Found heuristic solution: objective 178.7852620

Root relaxation: objective 1.552395e+02, 10 iterations, 0.00 seconds

    Nodes    |    Current Node    |     Objective Bounds      |     Work
 Expl Unexpl |  Obj  Depth IntInf | Incumbent    BestBd   Gap | It/Node Time

     0     0  155.23953    0    4  178.78526  155.23953  13.2%     -    0s
*    0     0               0     171.3184450  171.31844   0.0%     -    0s

Cutting planes:
  Learned: 1
  MIR: 2

Explored 0 nodes (12 simplex iterations) in 0.01 seconds
Thread count was 2 (of 2 available processors)

Optimal solution found (tolerance 1.00e-04)
Best objective 1.713184450000e+02, best bound 1.713184450000e+02, gap 0.0%
Read MPS format model from file tsp.mps
Reading time = 0.00 seconds
tsp.cmpl: 14 rows, 19 columns, 50 nonzeros
Optimize a model with 14 rows, 19 columns and 50 nonzeros
Presolve time: 0.00s
Presolved: 14 rows, 19 columns, 50 nonzeros
Variable types: 3 continuous, 16 integer (16 binary)
Found heuristic solution: objective 20059.773780
Found heuristic solution: objective 256.9449420

Root relaxation: objective 1.500562e+02, 11 iterations, 0.00 seconds

    Nodes    |    Current Node    |     Objective Bounds      |     Work
 Expl Unexpl |  Obj  Depth IntInf | Incumbent    BestBd   Gap | It/Node Time

     0     0  150.05623    0    4  256.94494  150.05623  41.6%     -    0s
*    0     0               0     185.3484860  185.34849   0.0%     -    0s

Cutting planes:
  Learned: 1
  MIR: 2

Explored 0 nodes (14 simplex iterations) in 0.00 seconds
Thread count was 2 (of 2 available processors)

Optimal solution found (tolerance 1.00e-04)
Best objective 1.853484860000e+02, best bound 1.853484860000e+02, gap 0.0%
Read MPS format model from file tsp.mps
Reading time = 0.00 seconds
tsp.cmpl: 14 rows, 19 columns, 50 nonzeros
Optimize a model with 14 rows, 19 columns and 50 nonzeros
Presolve time: 0.00s
Presolved: 14 rows, 19 columns, 50 nonzeros
Variable types: 3 continuous, 16 integer (16 binary)
Found heuristic solution: objective 20082.158676
Found heuristic solution: objective 260.5309400

Root relaxation: objective 2.050694e+02, 12 iterations, 0.00 seconds

    Nodes    |    Current Node    |     Objective Bounds      |     Work
 Expl Unexpl |  Obj  Depth IntInf | Incumbent    BestBd   Gap | It/Node Time

     0     0  205.06940    0    4  260.53094  205.06940  21.3%     -    0s
*    0     0               0     212.9016290  212.90163   0.0%     -    0s

Cutting planes:
  Learned: 1
  MIR: 2

Explored 0 nodes (14 simplex iterations) in 0.00 seconds
Thread count was 2 (of 2 available processors)

Optimal solution found (tolerance 1.00e-04)
Best objective 2.129016290000e+02, best bound 2.129016290000e+02, gap 0.0%
Read MPS format model from file tsp.mps
Reading time = 0.00 seconds
tsp.cmpl: 14 rows, 19 columns, 50 nonzeros
Optimize a model with 14 rows, 19 columns and 50 nonzeros
Presolve time: 0.00s
Presolved: 14 rows, 19 columns, 50 nonzeros
Variable types: 3 continuous, 16 integer (16 binary)
Found heuristic solution: objective 20172.469938
Found heuristic solution: objective 223.3939510
Found heuristic solution: objective 219.3939510

Root relaxation: objective 1.561101e+02, 10 iterations, 0.00 seconds

    Nodes    |    Current Node    |     Objective Bounds      |     Work
 Expl Unexpl |  Obj  Depth IntInf | Incumbent    BestBd   Gap | It/Node Time

     0     0  156.11009    0    4  219.39395  156.11009  28.8%     -    0s
     0     0     cutoff    0       219.39395  219.39395   0.0%     -    0s

Cutting planes:
  Learned: 1
  MIR: 1

Explored 0 nodes (11 simplex iterations) in 0.00 seconds
Thread count was 2 (of 2 available processors)

Optimal solution found (tolerance 1.00e-04)
Best objective 2.193939510000e+02, best bound 2.193939510000e+02, gap 0.0%
Read MPS format model from file tsp.mps
Reading time = 0.00 seconds
tsp.cmpl: 14 rows, 19 columns, 50 nonzeros
Optimize a model with 14 rows, 19 columns and 50 nonzeros
Presolve time: 0.00s
Presolved: 14 rows, 19 columns, 50 nonzeros
Variable types: 3 continuous, 16 integer (16 binary)
Found heuristic solution: objective 20055.038448
Found heuristic solution: objective 194.9715870

Root relaxation: objective 1.490064e+02, 10 iterations, 0.00 seconds

    Nodes    |    Current Node    |     Objective Bounds      |     Work
 Expl Unexpl |  Obj  Depth IntInf | Incumbent    BestBd   Gap | It/Node Time

     0     0  149.00643    0    4  194.97159  149.00643  23.6%     -    0s
*    0     0               0     160.5343740  160.53437   0.0%     -    0s

Cutting planes:
  Learned: 1
  MIR: 2

Explored 0 nodes (12 simplex iterations) in 0.00 seconds
Thread count was 2 (of 2 available processors)

Optimal solution found (tolerance 1.00e-04)
Best objective 1.605343740000e+02, best bound 1.605343740000e+02, gap 0.0%
Read MPS format model from file tsp.mps
Reading time = 0.00 seconds
tsp.cmpl: 14 rows, 19 columns, 50 nonzeros
Optimize a model with 14 rows, 19 columns and 50 nonzeros
Presolve time: 0.00s
Presolved: 14 rows, 19 columns, 50 nonzeros
Variable types: 3 continuous, 16 integer (16 binary)
Found heuristic solution: objective 20088.440038
Found heuristic solution: objective 291.0562290
Found heuristic solution: objective 282.0562290

Root relaxation: objective 2.306952e+02, 8 iterations, 0.00 seconds

    Nodes    |    Current Node    |     Objective Bounds      |     Work
 Expl Unexpl |  Obj  Depth IntInf | Incumbent    BestBd   Gap | It/Node Time

     0     0  230.69524    0    4  282.05623  230.69524  18.2%     -    0s
*    0     0               0     235.6332950  235.63329   0.0%     -    0s

Cutting planes:
  Learned: 1
  MIR: 2

Explored 0 nodes (10 simplex iterations) in 0.00 seconds
Thread count was 2 (of 2 available processors)

Optimal solution found (tolerance 1.00e-04)
Best objective 2.356332950000e+02, best bound 2.356332950000e+02, gap 0.0%
Read MPS format model from file tsp.mps
Reading time = 0.00 seconds
tsp.cmpl: 14 rows, 19 columns, 50 nonzeros
Optimize a model with 14 rows, 19 columns and 50 nonzeros
Presolve time: 0.00s
Presolved: 14 rows, 19 columns, 50 nonzeros
Variable types: 3 continuous, 16 integer (16 binary)
Found heuristic solution: objective 20039.735924
Found heuristic solution: objective 148.2728040
Found heuristic solution: objective 143.2728040

Root relaxation: objective 1.261846e+02, 9 iterations, 0.00 seconds

    Nodes    |    Current Node    |     Objective Bounds      |     Work
 Expl Unexpl |  Obj  Depth IntInf | Incumbent    BestBd   Gap | It/Node Time

*    0     0               0     126.1846040  126.18460   0.0%     -    0s

Explored 0 nodes (9 simplex iterations) in 0.00 seconds
Thread count was 2 (of 2 available processors)

Optimal solution found (tolerance 1.00e-04)
Best objective 1.261846040000e+02, best bound 1.261846040000e+02, gap 0.0%
Read MPS format model from file tsp.mps
Reading time = 0.00 seconds
tsp.cmpl: 14 rows, 19 columns, 50 nonzeros
Optimize a model with 14 rows, 19 columns and 50 nonzeros
Presolve time: 0.00s
Presolved: 14 rows, 19 columns, 50 nonzeros
Variable types: 3 continuous, 16 integer (16 binary)
Found heuristic solution: objective 20149.213182
Found heuristic solution: objective 287.6427860
Found heuristic solution: objective 282.6427860

Root relaxation: objective 2.300986e+02, 9 iterations, 0.00 seconds

    Nodes    |    Current Node    |     Objective Bounds      |     Work
 Expl Unexpl |  Obj  Depth IntInf | Incumbent    BestBd   Gap | It/Node Time

     0     0  230.09856    0    4  282.64279  230.09856  18.6%     -    0s
*    0     0               0     239.7474700  239.74747   0.0%     -    0s

Cutting planes:
  Learned: 1
  MIR: 2

Explored 0 nodes (12 simplex iterations) in 0.01 seconds
Thread count was 2 (of 2 available processors)

Optimal solution found (tolerance 1.00e-04)
Best objective 2.397474700000e+02, best bound 2.397474700000e+02, gap 0.0%
Read MPS format model from file tsp.mps
Reading time = 0.00 seconds
tsp.cmpl: 8 rows, 11 columns, 24 nonzeros
Optimize a model with 8 rows, 11 columns and 24 nonzeros
Presolve removed 1 rows and 2 columns
Presolve time: 0.00s
Presolved: 7 rows, 9 columns, 21 nonzeros
Variable types: 0 continuous, 9 integer (9 binary)
Found heuristic solution: objective 10152.062078

Root relaxation: objective 2.483106e+02, 5 iterations, 0.00 seconds

    Nodes    |    Current Node    |     Objective Bounds      |     Work
 Expl Unexpl |  Obj  Depth IntInf | Incumbent    BestBd   Gap | It/Node Time

*    0     0               0     248.3105540  248.31055   0.0%     -    0s

Explored 0 nodes (5 simplex iterations) in 0.00 seconds
Thread count was 2 (of 2 available processors)

Optimal solution found (tolerance 1.00e-04)
Best objective 2.483105540000e+02, best bound 2.483105540000e+02, gap 0.0%
Read MPS format model from file tsp.mps
Reading time = 0.00 seconds
tsp.cmpl: 8 rows, 11 columns, 24 nonzeros
Optimize a model with 8 rows, 11 columns and 24 nonzeros
Presolve removed 1 rows and 2 columns
Presolve time: 0.00s
Presolved: 7 rows, 9 columns, 21 nonzeros
Variable types: 0 continuous, 9 integer (9 binary)
Found heuristic solution: objective 10152.062078

Root relaxation: objective 2.483106e+02, 5 iterations, 0.00 seconds

    Nodes    |    Current Node    |     Objective Bounds      |     Work
 Expl Unexpl |  Obj  Depth IntInf | Incumbent    BestBd   Gap | It/Node Time

*    0     0               0     248.3105540  248.31055   0.0%     -    0s

Explored 0 nodes (5 simplex iterations) in 0.00 seconds
Thread count was 2 (of 2 available processors)

Optimal solution found (tolerance 1.00e-04)
Best objective 2.483105540000e+02, best bound 2.483105540000e+02, gap 0.0%
Read MPS format model from file tsp.mps
Reading time = 0.00 seconds
tsp.cmpl: 8 rows, 11 columns, 24 nonzeros
Optimize a model with 8 rows, 11 columns and 24 nonzeros
Presolve removed 1 rows and 2 columns
Presolve time: 0.00s
Presolved: 7 rows, 9 columns, 21 nonzeros
Variable types: 0 continuous, 9 integer (9 binary)
Found heuristic solution: objective 10152.062078

Root relaxation: objective 2.483106e+02, 5 iterations, 0.00 seconds

    Nodes    |    Current Node    |     Objective Bounds      |     Work
 Expl Unexpl |  Obj  Depth IntInf | Incumbent    BestBd   Gap | It/Node Time

*    0     0               0     248.3105540  248.31055   0.0%     -    0s

Explored 0 nodes (5 simplex iterations) in 0.00 seconds
Thread count was 2 (of 2 available processors)

Optimal solution found (tolerance 1.00e-04)
Best objective 2.483105540000e+02, best bound 2.483105540000e+02, gap 0.0%
Read MPS format model from file tsp.mps
Reading time = 0.00 seconds
tsp.cmpl: 8 rows, 11 columns, 24 nonzeros
Optimize a model with 8 rows, 11 columns and 24 nonzeros
Presolve removed 1 rows and 2 columns
Presolve time: 0.00s
Presolved: 7 rows, 9 columns, 21 nonzeros
Variable types: 0 continuous, 9 integer (9 binary)
Found heuristic solution: objective 10152.062078

Root relaxation: objective 2.483106e+02, 5 iterations, 0.00 seconds

    Nodes    |    Current Node    |     Objective Bounds      |     Work
 Expl Unexpl |  Obj  Depth IntInf | Incumbent    BestBd   Gap | It/Node Time

*    0     0               0     248.3105540  248.31055   0.0%     -    0s

Explored 0 nodes (5 simplex iterations) in 0.00 seconds
Thread count was 2 (of 2 available processors)

Optimal solution found (tolerance 1.00e-04)
Best objective 2.483105540000e+02, best bound 2.483105540000e+02, gap 0.0%
Read MPS format model from file tsp.mps
Reading time = 0.00 seconds
tsp.cmpl: 8 rows, 11 columns, 24 nonzeros
Optimize a model with 8 rows, 11 columns and 24 nonzeros
Presolve removed 1 rows and 2 columns
Presolve time: 0.00s
Presolved: 7 rows, 9 columns, 21 nonzeros
Variable types: 0 continuous, 9 integer (9 binary)
Found heuristic solution: objective 10152.062078

Root relaxation: objective 2.483106e+02, 5 iterations, 0.00 seconds

    Nodes    |    Current Node    |     Objective Bounds      |     Work
 Expl Unexpl |  Obj  Depth IntInf | Incumbent    BestBd   Gap | It/Node Time

*    0     0               0     248.3105540  248.31055   0.0%     -    0s

Explored 0 nodes (5 simplex iterations) in 0.00 seconds
Thread count was 2 (of 2 available processors)

Optimal solution found (tolerance 1.00e-04)
Best objective 2.483105540000e+02, best bound 2.483105540000e+02, gap 0.0%
Read MPS format model from file tsp.mps
Reading time = 0.00 seconds
tsp.cmpl: 8 rows, 11 columns, 24 nonzeros
Optimize a model with 8 rows, 11 columns and 24 nonzeros
Presolve removed 1 rows and 2 columns
Presolve time: 0.00s
Presolved: 7 rows, 9 columns, 21 nonzeros
Variable types: 0 continuous, 9 integer (9 binary)
Found heuristic solution: objective 10152.062078

Root relaxation: objective 2.483106e+02, 5 iterations, 0.00 seconds

    Nodes    |    Current Node    |     Objective Bounds      |     Work
 Expl Unexpl |  Obj  Depth IntInf | Incumbent    BestBd   Gap | It/Node Time

*    0     0               0     248.3105540  248.31055   0.0%     -    0s

Explored 0 nodes (5 simplex iterations) in 0.00 seconds
Thread count was 2 (of 2 available processors)

Optimal solution found (tolerance 1.00e-04)
Best objective 2.483105540000e+02, best bound 2.483105540000e+02, gap 0.0%
Read MPS format model from file tsp.mps
Reading time = 0.00 seconds
tsp.cmpl: 8 rows, 11 columns, 24 nonzeros
Optimize a model with 8 rows, 11 columns and 24 nonzeros
Presolve removed 1 rows and 2 columns
Presolve time: 0.00s
Presolved: 7 rows, 9 columns, 21 nonzeros
Variable types: 0 continuous, 9 integer (9 binary)
Found heuristic solution: objective 10152.062078

Root relaxation: objective 2.483106e+02, 5 iterations, 0.00 seconds

    Nodes    |    Current Node    |     Objective Bounds      |     Work
 Expl Unexpl |  Obj  Depth IntInf | Incumbent    BestBd   Gap | It/Node Time

*    0     0               0     248.3105540  248.31055   0.0%     -    0s

Explored 0 nodes (5 simplex iterations) in 0.00 seconds
Thread count was 2 (of 2 available processors)

Optimal solution found (tolerance 1.00e-04)
Best objective 2.483105540000e+02, best bound 2.483105540000e+02, gap 0.0%
Read MPS format model from file tsp.mps
Reading time = 0.00 seconds
tsp.cmpl: 8 rows, 11 columns, 24 nonzeros
Optimize a model with 8 rows, 11 columns and 24 nonzeros
Presolve removed 1 rows and 2 columns
Presolve time: 0.00s
Presolved: 7 rows, 9 columns, 21 nonzeros
Variable types: 0 continuous, 9 integer (9 binary)
Found heuristic solution: objective 10152.062078

Root relaxation: objective 2.483106e+02, 5 iterations, 0.00 seconds

    Nodes    |    Current Node    |     Objective Bounds      |     Work
 Expl Unexpl |  Obj  Depth IntInf | Incumbent    BestBd   Gap | It/Node Time

*    0     0               0     248.3105540  248.31055   0.0%     -    0s

Explored 0 nodes (5 simplex iterations) in 0.00 seconds
Thread count was 2 (of 2 available processors)

Optimal solution found (tolerance 1.00e-04)
Best objective 2.483105540000e+02, best bound 2.483105540000e+02, gap 0.0%
Read MPS format model from file tsp.mps
Reading time = 0.00 seconds
tsp.cmpl: 8 rows, 11 columns, 24 nonzeros
Optimize a model with 8 rows, 11 columns and 24 nonzeros
Presolve removed 1 rows and 2 columns
Presolve time: 0.00s
Presolved: 7 rows, 9 columns, 21 nonzeros
Variable types: 0 continuous, 9 integer (9 binary)
Found heuristic solution: objective 10152.062078

Root relaxation: objective 2.483106e+02, 5 iterations, 0.00 seconds

    Nodes    |    Current Node    |     Objective Bounds      |     Work
 Expl Unexpl |  Obj  Depth IntInf | Incumbent    BestBd   Gap | It/Node Time

*    0     0               0     248.3105540  248.31055   0.0%     -    0s

Explored 0 nodes (5 simplex iterations) in 0.00 seconds
Thread count was 2 (of 2 available processors)

Optimal solution found (tolerance 1.00e-04)
Best objective 2.483105540000e+02, best bound 2.483105540000e+02, gap 0.0%
Read MPS format model from file tsp.mps
Reading time = 0.00 seconds
tsp.cmpl: 8 rows, 11 columns, 24 nonzeros
Optimize a model with 8 rows, 11 columns and 24 nonzeros
Presolve removed 1 rows and 2 columns
Presolve time: 0.00s
Presolved: 7 rows, 9 columns, 21 nonzeros
Variable types: 0 continuous, 9 integer (9 binary)
Found heuristic solution: objective 10152.062078

Root relaxation: objective 2.483106e+02, 5 iterations, 0.00 seconds

    Nodes    |    Current Node    |     Objective Bounds      |     Work
 Expl Unexpl |  Obj  Depth IntInf | Incumbent    BestBd   Gap | It/Node Time

*    0     0               0     248.3105540  248.31055   0.0%     -    0s

Explored 0 nodes (5 simplex iterations) in 0.00 seconds
Thread count was 2 (of 2 available processors)

Optimal solution found (tolerance 1.00e-04)
Best objective 2.483105540000e+02, best bound 2.483105540000e+02, gap 0.0%
Read MPS format model from file tsp.mps
Reading time = 0.00 seconds
tsp.cmpl: 8 rows, 11 columns, 24 nonzeros
Optimize a model with 8 rows, 11 columns and 24 nonzeros
Presolve removed 1 rows and 2 columns
Presolve time: 0.00s
Presolved: 7 rows, 9 columns, 21 nonzeros
Variable types: 0 continuous, 9 integer (9 binary)
Found heuristic solution: objective 10152.062078

Root relaxation: objective 2.483106e+02, 5 iterations, 0.00 seconds

    Nodes    |    Current Node    |     Objective Bounds      |     Work
 Expl Unexpl |  Obj  Depth IntInf | Incumbent    BestBd   Gap | It/Node Time

*    0     0               0     248.3105540  248.31055   0.0%     -    0s

Explored 0 nodes (5 simplex iterations) in 0.00 seconds
Thread count was 2 (of 2 available processors)

Optimal solution found (tolerance 1.00e-04)
Best objective 2.483105540000e+02, best bound 2.483105540000e+02, gap 0.0%
Read MPS format model from file tsp.mps
Reading time = 0.00 seconds
tsp.cmpl: 8 rows, 11 columns, 24 nonzeros
Optimize a model with 8 rows, 11 columns and 24 nonzeros
Presolve removed 1 rows and 2 columns
Presolve time: 0.00s
Presolved: 7 rows, 9 columns, 21 nonzeros
Variable types: 0 continuous, 9 integer (9 binary)
Found heuristic solution: objective 10152.062078

Root relaxation: objective 2.483106e+02, 5 iterations, 0.00 seconds

    Nodes    |    Current Node    |     Objective Bounds      |     Work
 Expl Unexpl |  Obj  Depth IntInf | Incumbent    BestBd   Gap | It/Node Time

*    0     0               0     248.3105540  248.31055   0.0%     -    0s

Explored 0 nodes (5 simplex iterations) in 0.00 seconds
Thread count was 2 (of 2 available processors)

Optimal solution found (tolerance 1.00e-04)
Best objective 2.483105540000e+02, best bound 2.483105540000e+02, gap 0.0%
Read MPS format model from file tsp.mps
Reading time = 0.00 seconds
tsp.cmpl: 8 rows, 11 columns, 24 nonzeros
Optimize a model with 8 rows, 11 columns and 24 nonzeros
Presolve removed 1 rows and 2 columns
Presolve time: 0.00s
Presolved: 7 rows, 9 columns, 21 nonzeros
Variable types: 0 continuous, 9 integer (9 binary)
Found heuristic solution: objective 10152.062078

Root relaxation: objective 2.483106e+02, 5 iterations, 0.00 seconds

    Nodes    |    Current Node    |     Objective Bounds      |     Work
 Expl Unexpl |  Obj  Depth IntInf | Incumbent    BestBd   Gap | It/Node Time

*    0     0               0     248.3105540  248.31055   0.0%     -    0s

Explored 0 nodes (5 simplex iterations) in 0.00 seconds
Thread count was 2 (of 2 available processors)

Optimal solution found (tolerance 1.00e-04)
Best objective 2.483105540000e+02, best bound 2.483105540000e+02, gap 0.0%
Read MPS format model from file tsp.mps
Reading time = 0.00 seconds
tsp.cmpl: 8 rows, 11 columns, 24 nonzeros
Optimize a model with 8 rows, 11 columns and 24 nonzeros
Presolve removed 1 rows and 2 columns
Presolve time: 0.00s
Presolved: 7 rows, 9 columns, 21 nonzeros
Variable types: 0 continuous, 9 integer (9 binary)
Found heuristic solution: objective 10152.062078

Root relaxation: objective 2.483106e+02, 5 iterations, 0.00 seconds

    Nodes    |    Current Node    |     Objective Bounds      |     Work
 Expl Unexpl |  Obj  Depth IntInf | Incumbent    BestBd   Gap | It/Node Time

*    0     0               0     248.3105540  248.31055   0.0%     -    0s

Explored 0 nodes (5 simplex iterations) in 0.00 seconds
Thread count was 2 (of 2 available processors)

Optimal solution found (tolerance 1.00e-04)
Best objective 2.483105540000e+02, best bound 2.483105540000e+02, gap 0.0%
Read MPS format model from file tsp.mps
Reading time = 0.05 seconds
tsp.cmpl: 8 rows, 11 columns, 24 nonzeros
Optimize a model with 8 rows, 11 columns and 24 nonzeros
Presolve removed 1 rows and 2 columns
Presolve time: 0.00s
Presolved: 7 rows, 9 columns, 21 nonzeros
Variable types: 0 continuous, 9 integer (9 binary)
Found heuristic solution: objective 10152.062078

Root relaxation: objective 2.483106e+02, 5 iterations, 0.00 seconds

    Nodes    |    Current Node    |     Objective Bounds      |     Work
 Expl Unexpl |  Obj  Depth IntInf | Incumbent    BestBd   Gap | It/Node Time

*    0     0               0     248.3105540  248.31055   0.0%     -    0s

Explored 0 nodes (5 simplex iterations) in 0.00 seconds
Thread count was 2 (of 2 available processors)

Optimal solution found (tolerance 1.00e-04)
Best objective 2.483105540000e+02, best bound 2.483105540000e+02, gap 0.0%
Read MPS format model from file tsp.mps
Reading time = 0.00 seconds
tsp.cmpl: 8 rows, 11 columns, 24 nonzeros
Optimize a model with 8 rows, 11 columns and 24 nonzeros
Presolve removed 1 rows and 2 columns
Presolve time: 0.00s
Presolved: 7 rows, 9 columns, 21 nonzeros
Variable types: 0 continuous, 9 integer (9 binary)
Found heuristic solution: objective 10152.062078

Root relaxation: objective 2.483106e+02, 5 iterations, 0.00 seconds

    Nodes    |    Current Node    |     Objective Bounds      |     Work
 Expl Unexpl |  Obj  Depth IntInf | Incumbent    BestBd   Gap | It/Node Time

*    0     0               0     248.3105540  248.31055   0.0%     -    0s

Explored 0 nodes (5 simplex iterations) in 0.00 seconds
Thread count was 2 (of 2 available processors)

Optimal solution found (tolerance 1.00e-04)
Best objective 2.483105540000e+02, best bound 2.483105540000e+02, gap 0.0%
Read MPS format model from file tsp.mps
Reading time = 0.00 seconds
tsp.cmpl: 8 rows, 11 columns, 24 nonzeros
Optimize a model with 8 rows, 11 columns and 24 nonzeros
Presolve removed 1 rows and 2 columns
Presolve time: 0.00s
Presolved: 7 rows, 9 columns, 21 nonzeros
Variable types: 0 continuous, 9 integer (9 binary)
Found heuristic solution: objective 10152.062078

Root relaxation: objective 2.483106e+02, 5 iterations, 0.00 seconds

    Nodes    |    Current Node    |     Objective Bounds      |     Work
 Expl Unexpl |  Obj  Depth IntInf | Incumbent    BestBd   Gap | It/Node Time

*    0     0               0     248.3105540  248.31055   0.0%     -    0s

Explored 0 nodes (5 simplex iterations) in 0.00 seconds
Thread count was 2 (of 2 available processors)

Optimal solution found (tolerance 1.00e-04)
Best objective 2.483105540000e+02, best bound 2.483105540000e+02, gap 0.0%
Read MPS format model from file tsp.mps
Reading time = 0.00 seconds
tsp.cmpl: 8 rows, 11 columns, 24 nonzeros
Optimize a model with 8 rows, 11 columns and 24 nonzeros
Presolve removed 1 rows and 2 columns
Presolve time: 0.00s
Presolved: 7 rows, 9 columns, 21 nonzeros
Variable types: 0 continuous, 9 integer (9 binary)
Found heuristic solution: objective 10152.062078

Root relaxation: objective 2.483106e+02, 5 iterations, 0.00 seconds

    Nodes    |    Current Node    |     Objective Bounds      |     Work
 Expl Unexpl |  Obj  Depth IntInf | Incumbent    BestBd   Gap | It/Node Time

*    0     0               0     248.3105540  248.31055   0.0%     -    0s

Explored 0 nodes (5 simplex iterations) in 0.00 seconds
Thread count was 2 (of 2 available processors)

Optimal solution found (tolerance 1.00e-04)
Best objective 2.483105540000e+02, best bound 2.483105540000e+02, gap 0.0%
Read MPS format model from file tsp.mps
Reading time = 0.00 seconds
tsp.cmpl: 8 rows, 11 columns, 24 nonzeros
Optimize a model with 8 rows, 11 columns and 24 nonzeros
Presolve removed 1 rows and 2 columns
Presolve time: 0.00s
Presolved: 7 rows, 9 columns, 21 nonzeros
Variable types: 0 continuous, 9 integer (9 binary)
Found heuristic solution: objective 10152.062078

Root relaxation: objective 2.483106e+02, 5 iterations, 0.00 seconds

    Nodes    |    Current Node    |     Objective Bounds      |     Work
 Expl Unexpl |  Obj  Depth IntInf | Incumbent    BestBd   Gap | It/Node Time

*    0     0               0     248.3105540  248.31055   0.0%     -    0s

Explored 0 nodes (5 simplex iterations) in 0.00 seconds
Thread count was 2 (of 2 available processors)

Optimal solution found (tolerance 1.00e-04)
Best objective 2.483105540000e+02, best bound 2.483105540000e+02, gap 0.0%
Read MPS format model from file tsp.mps
Reading time = 0.00 seconds
tsp.cmpl: 8 rows, 11 columns, 24 nonzeros
Optimize a model with 8 rows, 11 columns and 24 nonzeros
Presolve removed 1 rows and 2 columns
Presolve time: 0.00s
Presolved: 7 rows, 9 columns, 21 nonzeros
Variable types: 0 continuous, 9 integer (9 binary)
Found heuristic solution: objective 10152.062078

Root relaxation: objective 2.483106e+02, 5 iterations, 0.00 seconds

    Nodes    |    Current Node    |     Objective Bounds      |     Work
 Expl Unexpl |  Obj  Depth IntInf | Incumbent    BestBd   Gap | It/Node Time

*    0     0               0     248.3105540  248.31055   0.0%     -    0s

Explored 0 nodes (5 simplex iterations) in 0.00 seconds
Thread count was 2 (of 2 available processors)

Optimal solution found (tolerance 1.00e-04)
Best objective 2.483105540000e+02, best bound 2.483105540000e+02, gap 0.0%
Read MPS format model from file tsp.mps
Reading time = 0.00 seconds
tsp.cmpl: 8 rows, 11 columns, 24 nonzeros
Optimize a model with 8 rows, 11 columns and 24 nonzeros
Presolve removed 1 rows and 2 columns
Presolve time: 0.00s
Presolved: 7 rows, 9 columns, 21 nonzeros
Variable types: 0 continuous, 9 integer (9 binary)
Found heuristic solution: objective 10152.062078

Root relaxation: objective 2.483106e+02, 5 iterations, 0.00 seconds

    Nodes    |    Current Node    |     Objective Bounds      |     Work
 Expl Unexpl |  Obj  Depth IntInf | Incumbent    BestBd   Gap | It/Node Time

*    0     0               0     248.3105540  248.31055   0.0%     -    0s

Explored 0 nodes (5 simplex iterations) in 0.01 seconds
Thread count was 2 (of 2 available processors)

Optimal solution found (tolerance 1.00e-04)
Best objective 2.483105540000e+02, best bound 2.483105540000e+02, gap 0.0%
Read MPS format model from file tsp.mps
Reading time = 0.00 seconds
tsp.cmpl: 8 rows, 11 columns, 24 nonzeros
Optimize a model with 8 rows, 11 columns and 24 nonzeros
Presolve removed 1 rows and 2 columns
Presolve time: 0.00s
Presolved: 7 rows, 9 columns, 21 nonzeros
Variable types: 0 continuous, 9 integer (9 binary)
Found heuristic solution: objective 10152.062078

Root relaxation: objective 2.483106e+02, 5 iterations, 0.00 seconds

    Nodes    |    Current Node    |     Objective Bounds      |     Work
 Expl Unexpl |  Obj  Depth IntInf | Incumbent    BestBd   Gap | It/Node Time

*    0     0               0     248.3105540  248.31055   0.0%     -    0s

Explored 0 nodes (5 simplex iterations) in 0.00 seconds
Thread count was 2 (of 2 available processors)

Optimal solution found (tolerance 1.00e-04)
Best objective 2.483105540000e+02, best bound 2.483105540000e+02, gap 0.0%
Read MPS format model from file tsp.mps
Reading time = 0.00 seconds
tsp.cmpl: 8 rows, 11 columns, 24 nonzeros
Optimize a model with 8 rows, 11 columns and 24 nonzeros
Presolve removed 1 rows and 2 columns
Presolve time: 0.00s
Presolved: 7 rows, 9 columns, 21 nonzeros
Variable types: 0 continuous, 9 integer (9 binary)
Found heuristic solution: objective 10152.062078

Root relaxation: objective 2.483106e+02, 5 iterations, 0.00 seconds

    Nodes    |    Current Node    |     Objective Bounds      |     Work
 Expl Unexpl |  Obj  Depth IntInf | Incumbent    BestBd   Gap | It/Node Time

*    0     0               0     248.3105540  248.31055   0.0%     -    0s

Explored 0 nodes (5 simplex iterations) in 0.00 seconds
Thread count was 2 (of 2 available processors)

Optimal solution found (tolerance 1.00e-04)
Best objective 2.483105540000e+02, best bound 2.483105540000e+02, gap 0.0%
Read MPS format model from file tsp.mps
Reading time = 0.00 seconds
tsp.cmpl: 8 rows, 11 columns, 24 nonzeros
Optimize a model with 8 rows, 11 columns and 24 nonzeros
Presolve removed 1 rows and 2 columns
Presolve time: 0.00s
Presolved: 7 rows, 9 columns, 21 nonzeros
Variable types: 0 continuous, 9 integer (9 binary)
Found heuristic solution: objective 10152.062078

Root relaxation: objective 2.483106e+02, 5 iterations, 0.00 seconds

    Nodes    |    Current Node    |     Objective Bounds      |     Work
 Expl Unexpl |  Obj  Depth IntInf | Incumbent    BestBd   Gap | It/Node Time

*    0     0               0     248.3105540  248.31055   0.0%     -    0s

Explored 0 nodes (5 simplex iterations) in 0.00 seconds
Thread count was 2 (of 2 available processors)

Optimal solution found (tolerance 1.00e-04)
Best objective 2.483105540000e+02, best bound 2.483105540000e+02, gap 0.0%
Read MPS format model from file tsp.mps
Reading time = 0.00 seconds
tsp.cmpl: 8 rows, 11 columns, 24 nonzeros
Optimize a model with 8 rows, 11 columns and 24 nonzeros
Presolve removed 1 rows and 2 columns
Presolve time: 0.00s
Presolved: 7 rows, 9 columns, 21 nonzeros
Variable types: 0 continuous, 9 integer (9 binary)
Found heuristic solution: objective 10152.062078

Root relaxation: objective 2.483106e+02, 5 iterations, 0.00 seconds

    Nodes    |    Current Node    |     Objective Bounds      |     Work
 Expl Unexpl |  Obj  Depth IntInf | Incumbent    BestBd   Gap | It/Node Time

*    0     0               0     248.3105540  248.31055   0.0%     -    0s

Explored 0 nodes (5 simplex iterations) in 0.00 seconds
Thread count was 2 (of 2 available processors)

Optimal solution found (tolerance 1.00e-04)
Best objective 2.483105540000e+02, best bound 2.483105540000e+02, gap 0.0%
Read MPS format model from file tsp.mps
Reading time = 0.03 seconds
tsp.cmpl: 8 rows, 11 columns, 24 nonzeros
Optimize a model with 8 rows, 11 columns and 24 nonzeros
Presolve removed 1 rows and 2 columns
Presolve time: 0.03s
Presolved: 7 rows, 9 columns, 21 nonzeros
Variable types: 0 continuous, 9 integer (9 binary)
Found heuristic solution: objective 10152.062078

Root relaxation: objective 2.483106e+02, 5 iterations, 0.02 seconds

    Nodes    |    Current Node    |     Objective Bounds      |     Work
 Expl Unexpl |  Obj  Depth IntInf | Incumbent    BestBd   Gap | It/Node Time

*    0     0               0     248.3105540  248.31055   0.0%     -    0s

Explored 0 nodes (5 simplex iterations) in 0.06 seconds
Thread count was 2 (of 2 available processors)

Optimal solution found (tolerance 1.00e-04)
Best objective 2.483105540000e+02, best bound 2.483105540000e+02, gap 0.0%
Read MPS format model from file tsp.mps
Reading time = 0.00 seconds
tsp.cmpl: 8 rows, 11 columns, 24 nonzeros
Optimize a model with 8 rows, 11 columns and 24 nonzeros
Presolve removed 1 rows and 2 columns
Presolve time: 0.00s
Presolved: 7 rows, 9 columns, 21 nonzeros
Variable types: 0 continuous, 9 integer (9 binary)
Found heuristic solution: objective 10152.062078

Root relaxation: objective 2.483106e+02, 5 iterations, 0.00 seconds

    Nodes    |    Current Node    |     Objective Bounds      |     Work
 Expl Unexpl |  Obj  Depth IntInf | Incumbent    BestBd   Gap | It/Node Time

*    0     0               0     248.3105540  248.31055   0.0%     -    0s

Explored 0 nodes (5 simplex iterations) in 0.00 seconds
Thread count was 2 (of 2 available processors)

Optimal solution found (tolerance 1.00e-04)
Best objective 2.483105540000e+02, best bound 2.483105540000e+02, gap 0.0%
Read MPS format model from file tsp.mps
Reading time = 0.00 seconds
tsp.cmpl: 8 rows, 11 columns, 24 nonzeros
Optimize a model with 8 rows, 11 columns and 24 nonzeros
Presolve removed 1 rows and 2 columns
Presolve time: 0.00s
Presolved: 7 rows, 9 columns, 21 nonzeros
Variable types: 0 continuous, 9 integer (9 binary)
Found heuristic solution: objective 10152.062078

Root relaxation: objective 2.483106e+02, 5 iterations, 0.00 seconds

    Nodes    |    Current Node    |     Objective Bounds      |     Work
 Expl Unexpl |  Obj  Depth IntInf | Incumbent    BestBd   Gap | It/Node Time

*    0     0               0     248.3105540  248.31055   0.0%     -    0s

Explored 0 nodes (5 simplex iterations) in 0.00 seconds
Thread count was 2 (of 2 available processors)

Optimal solution found (tolerance 1.00e-04)
Best objective 2.483105540000e+02, best bound 2.483105540000e+02, gap 0.0%
Read MPS format model from file tsp.mps
Reading time = 0.00 seconds
tsp.cmpl: 8 rows, 11 columns, 24 nonzeros
Optimize a model with 8 rows, 11 columns and 24 nonzeros
Presolve removed 1 rows and 2 columns
Presolve time: 0.00s
Presolved: 7 rows, 9 columns, 21 nonzeros
Variable types: 0 continuous, 9 integer (9 binary)
Found heuristic solution: objective 10152.062078

Root relaxation: objective 2.483106e+02, 5 iterations, 0.00 seconds

    Nodes    |    Current Node    |     Objective Bounds      |     Work
 Expl Unexpl |  Obj  Depth IntInf | Incumbent    BestBd   Gap | It/Node Time

*    0     0               0     248.3105540  248.31055   0.0%     -    0s

Explored 0 nodes (5 simplex iterations) in 0.00 seconds
Thread count was 2 (of 2 available processors)

Optimal solution found (tolerance 1.00e-04)
Best objective 2.483105540000e+02, best bound 2.483105540000e+02, gap 0.0%
Read MPS format model from file tsp.mps
Reading time = 0.00 seconds
tsp.cmpl: 8 rows, 11 columns, 24 nonzeros
Optimize a model with 8 rows, 11 columns and 24 nonzeros
Presolve removed 1 rows and 2 columns
Presolve time: 0.00s
Presolved: 7 rows, 9 columns, 21 nonzeros
Variable types: 0 continuous, 9 integer (9 binary)
Found heuristic solution: objective 10152.062078

Root relaxation: objective 2.483106e+02, 5 iterations, 0.00 seconds

    Nodes    |    Current Node    |     Objective Bounds      |     Work
 Expl Unexpl |  Obj  Depth IntInf | Incumbent    BestBd   Gap | It/Node Time

*    0     0               0     248.3105540  248.31055   0.0%     -    0s

Explored 0 nodes (5 simplex iterations) in 0.00 seconds
Thread count was 2 (of 2 available processors)

Optimal solution found (tolerance 1.00e-04)
Best objective 2.483105540000e+02, best bound 2.483105540000e+02, gap 0.0%
Read MPS format model from file tsp.mps
Reading time = 0.05 seconds
tsp.cmpl: 8 rows, 11 columns, 24 nonzeros
Optimize a model with 8 rows, 11 columns and 24 nonzeros
Presolve removed 1 rows and 2 columns
Presolve time: 0.00s
Presolved: 7 rows, 9 columns, 21 nonzeros
Variable types: 0 continuous, 9 integer (9 binary)
Found heuristic solution: objective 10152.062078

Root relaxation: objective 2.483106e+02, 5 iterations, 0.00 seconds

    Nodes    |    Current Node    |     Objective Bounds      |     Work
 Expl Unexpl |  Obj  Depth IntInf | Incumbent    BestBd   Gap | It/Node Time

*    0     0               0     248.3105540  248.31055   0.0%     -    0s

Explored 0 nodes (5 simplex iterations) in 0.00 seconds
Thread count was 2 (of 2 available processors)

Optimal solution found (tolerance 1.00e-04)
Best objective 2.483105540000e+02, best bound 2.483105540000e+02, gap 0.0%
Read MPS format model from file tsp.mps
Reading time = 0.04 seconds
tsp.cmpl: 8 rows, 11 columns, 24 nonzeros
Optimize a model with 8 rows, 11 columns and 24 nonzeros
Presolve removed 1 rows and 2 columns
Presolve time: 0.00s
Presolved: 7 rows, 9 columns, 21 nonzeros
Variable types: 0 continuous, 9 integer (9 binary)
Found heuristic solution: objective 10152.062078

Root relaxation: objective 2.483106e+02, 5 iterations, 0.00 seconds

    Nodes    |    Current Node    |     Objective Bounds      |     Work
 Expl Unexpl |  Obj  Depth IntInf | Incumbent    BestBd   Gap | It/Node Time

*    0     0               0     248.3105540  248.31055   0.0%     -    0s

Explored 0 nodes (5 simplex iterations) in 0.00 seconds
Thread count was 2 (of 2 available processors)

Optimal solution found (tolerance 1.00e-04)
Best objective 2.483105540000e+02, best bound 2.483105540000e+02, gap 0.0%
Read MPS format model from file tsp.mps
Reading time = 0.00 seconds
tsp.cmpl: 8 rows, 11 columns, 24 nonzeros
Optimize a model with 8 rows, 11 columns and 24 nonzeros
Presolve removed 1 rows and 2 columns
Presolve time: 0.00s
Presolved: 7 rows, 9 columns, 21 nonzeros
Variable types: 0 continuous, 9 integer (9 binary)
Found heuristic solution: objective 10152.062078

Root relaxation: objective 2.483106e+02, 5 iterations, 0.00 seconds

    Nodes    |    Current Node    |     Objective Bounds      |     Work
 Expl Unexpl |  Obj  Depth IntInf | Incumbent    BestBd   Gap | It/Node Time

*    0     0               0     248.3105540  248.31055   0.0%     -    0s

Explored 0 nodes (5 simplex iterations) in 0.00 seconds
Thread count was 2 (of 2 available processors)

Optimal solution found (tolerance 1.00e-04)
Best objective 2.483105540000e+02, best bound 2.483105540000e+02, gap 0.0%
Read MPS format model from file tsp.mps
Reading time = 0.00 seconds
tsp.cmpl: 8 rows, 11 columns, 24 nonzeros
Optimize a model with 8 rows, 11 columns and 24 nonzeros
Presolve removed 1 rows and 2 columns
Presolve time: 0.00s
Presolved: 7 rows, 9 columns, 21 nonzeros
Variable types: 0 continuous, 9 integer (9 binary)
Found heuristic solution: objective 10152.062078

Root relaxation: objective 2.483106e+02, 5 iterations, 0.00 seconds

    Nodes    |    Current Node    |     Objective Bounds      |     Work
 Expl Unexpl |  Obj  Depth IntInf | Incumbent    BestBd   Gap | It/Node Time

*    0     0               0     248.3105540  248.31055   0.0%     -    0s

Explored 0 nodes (5 simplex iterations) in 0.00 seconds
Thread count was 2 (of 2 available processors)

Optimal solution found (tolerance 1.00e-04)
Best objective 2.483105540000e+02, best bound 2.483105540000e+02, gap 0.0%
Read MPS format model from file tsp.mps
Reading time = 0.00 seconds
tsp.cmpl: 8 rows, 11 columns, 24 nonzeros
Optimize a model with 8 rows, 11 columns and 24 nonzeros
Presolve removed 1 rows and 2 columns
Presolve time: 0.00s
Presolved: 7 rows, 9 columns, 21 nonzeros
Variable types: 0 continuous, 9 integer (9 binary)
Found heuristic solution: objective 10152.062078

Root relaxation: objective 2.483106e+02, 5 iterations, 0.00 seconds

    Nodes    |    Current Node    |     Objective Bounds      |     Work
 Expl Unexpl |  Obj  Depth IntInf | Incumbent    BestBd   Gap | It/Node Time

*    0     0               0     248.3105540  248.31055   0.0%     -    0s

Explored 0 nodes (5 simplex iterations) in 0.00 seconds
Thread count was 2 (of 2 available processors)

Optimal solution found (tolerance 1.00e-04)
Best objective 2.483105540000e+02, best bound 2.483105540000e+02, gap 0.0%
Read MPS format model from file tsp.mps
Reading time = 0.01 seconds
tsp.cmpl: 8 rows, 11 columns, 24 nonzeros
Optimize a model with 8 rows, 11 columns and 24 nonzeros
Presolve removed 1 rows and 2 columns
Presolve time: 0.00s
Presolved: 7 rows, 9 columns, 21 nonzeros
Variable types: 0 continuous, 9 integer (9 binary)
Found heuristic solution: objective 10152.062078

Root relaxation: objective 2.483106e+02, 5 iterations, 0.00 seconds

    Nodes    |    Current Node    |     Objective Bounds      |     Work
 Expl Unexpl |  Obj  Depth IntInf | Incumbent    BestBd   Gap | It/Node Time

*    0     0               0     248.3105540  248.31055   0.0%     -    0s

Explored 0 nodes (5 simplex iterations) in 0.04 seconds
Thread count was 2 (of 2 available processors)

Optimal solution found (tolerance 1.00e-04)
Best objective 2.483105540000e+02, best bound 2.483105540000e+02, gap 0.0%
Read MPS format model from file tsp.mps
Reading time = 0.00 seconds
tsp.cmpl: 8 rows, 11 columns, 24 nonzeros
Optimize a model with 8 rows, 11 columns and 24 nonzeros
Presolve removed 1 rows and 2 columns
Presolve time: 0.03s
Presolved: 7 rows, 9 columns, 21 nonzeros
Variable types: 0 continuous, 9 integer (9 binary)
Found heuristic solution: objective 10152.062078

Root relaxation: objective 2.483106e+02, 5 iterations, 0.01 seconds

    Nodes    |    Current Node    |     Objective Bounds      |     Work
 Expl Unexpl |  Obj  Depth IntInf | Incumbent    BestBd   Gap | It/Node Time

*    0     0               0     248.3105540  248.31055   0.0%     -    0s

Explored 0 nodes (5 simplex iterations) in 0.05 seconds
Thread count was 2 (of 2 available processors)

Optimal solution found (tolerance 1.00e-04)
Best objective 2.483105540000e+02, best bound 2.483105540000e+02, gap 0.0%
Read MPS format model from file tsp.mps
Reading time = 0.41 seconds
tsp.cmpl: 8 rows, 11 columns, 24 nonzeros
Optimize a model with 8 rows, 11 columns and 24 nonzeros
Presolve removed 1 rows and 2 columns
Presolve time: 0.00s
Presolved: 7 rows, 9 columns, 21 nonzeros
Variable types: 0 continuous, 9 integer (9 binary)
Found heuristic solution: objective 10152.062078

Root relaxation: objective 2.483106e+02, 5 iterations, 0.00 seconds

    Nodes    |    Current Node    |     Objective Bounds      |     Work
 Expl Unexpl |  Obj  Depth IntInf | Incumbent    BestBd   Gap | It/Node Time

*    0     0               0     248.3105540  248.31055   0.0%     -    0s

Explored 0 nodes (5 simplex iterations) in 0.00 seconds
Thread count was 2 (of 2 available processors)

Optimal solution found (tolerance 1.00e-04)
Best objective 2.483105540000e+02, best bound 2.483105540000e+02, gap 0.0%
Read MPS format model from file tsp.mps
Reading time = 0.00 seconds
tsp.cmpl: 8 rows, 11 columns, 24 nonzeros
Optimize a model with 8 rows, 11 columns and 24 nonzeros
Presolve removed 1 rows and 2 columns
Presolve time: 0.00s
Presolved: 7 rows, 9 columns, 21 nonzeros
Variable types: 0 continuous, 9 integer (9 binary)
Found heuristic solution: objective 10152.062078

Root relaxation: objective 2.483106e+02, 5 iterations, 0.00 seconds

    Nodes    |    Current Node    |     Objective Bounds      |     Work
 Expl Unexpl |  Obj  Depth IntInf | Incumbent    BestBd   Gap | It/Node Time

*    0     0               0     248.3105540  248.31055   0.0%     -    0s

Explored 0 nodes (5 simplex iterations) in 0.00 seconds
Thread count was 2 (of 2 available processors)

Optimal solution found (tolerance 1.00e-04)
Best objective 2.483105540000e+02, best bound 2.483105540000e+02, gap 0.0%
Read MPS format model from file tsp.mps
Reading time = 0.00 seconds
tsp.cmpl: 8 rows, 11 columns, 24 nonzeros
Optimize a model with 8 rows, 11 columns and 24 nonzeros
Presolve removed 1 rows and 2 columns
Presolve time: 0.00s
Presolved: 7 rows, 9 columns, 21 nonzeros
Variable types: 0 continuous, 9 integer (9 binary)
Found heuristic solution: objective 10152.062078

Root relaxation: objective 2.483106e+02, 5 iterations, 0.00 seconds

    Nodes    |    Current Node    |     Objective Bounds      |     Work
 Expl Unexpl |  Obj  Depth IntInf | Incumbent    BestBd   Gap | It/Node Time

*    0     0               0     248.3105540  248.31055   0.0%     -    0s

Explored 0 nodes (5 simplex iterations) in 0.00 seconds
Thread count was 2 (of 2 available processors)

Optimal solution found (tolerance 1.00e-04)
Best objective 2.483105540000e+02, best bound 2.483105540000e+02, gap 0.0%
Read MPS format model from file tsp.mps
Reading time = 0.00 seconds
tsp.cmpl: 8 rows, 11 columns, 24 nonzeros
Optimize a model with 8 rows, 11 columns and 24 nonzeros
Presolve removed 1 rows and 2 columns
Presolve time: 0.00s
Presolved: 7 rows, 9 columns, 21 nonzeros
Variable types: 0 continuous, 9 integer (9 binary)
Found heuristic solution: objective 10152.062078

Root relaxation: objective 2.483106e+02, 5 iterations, 0.00 seconds

    Nodes    |    Current Node    |     Objective Bounds      |     Work
 Expl Unexpl |  Obj  Depth IntInf | Incumbent    BestBd   Gap | It/Node Time

*    0     0               0     248.3105540  248.31055   0.0%     -    0s

Explored 0 nodes (5 simplex iterations) in 0.00 seconds
Thread count was 2 (of 2 available processors)

Optimal solution found (tolerance 1.00e-04)
Best objective 2.483105540000e+02, best bound 2.483105540000e+02, gap 0.0%
Read MPS format model from file tsp.mps
Reading time = 0.00 seconds
tsp.cmpl: 8 rows, 11 columns, 24 nonzeros
Optimize a model with 8 rows, 11 columns and 24 nonzeros
Presolve removed 1 rows and 2 columns
Presolve time: 0.00s
Presolved: 7 rows, 9 columns, 21 nonzeros
Variable types: 0 continuous, 9 integer (9 binary)
Found heuristic solution: objective 10152.062078

Root relaxation: objective 2.483106e+02, 5 iterations, 0.00 seconds

    Nodes    |    Current Node    |     Objective Bounds      |     Work
 Expl Unexpl |  Obj  Depth IntInf | Incumbent    BestBd   Gap | It/Node Time

*    0     0               0     248.3105540  248.31055   0.0%     -    0s

Explored 0 nodes (5 simplex iterations) in 0.00 seconds
Thread count was 2 (of 2 available processors)

Optimal solution found (tolerance 1.00e-04)
Best objective 2.483105540000e+02, best bound 2.483105540000e+02, gap 0.0%
Read MPS format model from file tsp.mps
Reading time = 0.00 seconds
tsp.cmpl: 8 rows, 11 columns, 24 nonzeros
Optimize a model with 8 rows, 11 columns and 24 nonzeros
Presolve removed 1 rows and 2 columns
Presolve time: 0.00s
Presolved: 7 rows, 9 columns, 21 nonzeros
Variable types: 0 continuous, 9 integer (9 binary)
Found heuristic solution: objective 10152.062078

Root relaxation: objective 2.483106e+02, 5 iterations, 0.00 seconds

    Nodes    |    Current Node    |     Objective Bounds      |     Work
 Expl Unexpl |  Obj  Depth IntInf | Incumbent    BestBd   Gap | It/Node Time

*    0     0               0     248.3105540  248.31055   0.0%     -    0s

Explored 0 nodes (5 simplex iterations) in 0.00 seconds
Thread count was 2 (of 2 available processors)

Optimal solution found (tolerance 1.00e-04)
Best objective 2.483105540000e+02, best bound 2.483105540000e+02, gap 0.0%
Read MPS format model from file tsp.mps
Reading time = 0.00 seconds
tsp.cmpl: 8 rows, 11 columns, 24 nonzeros
Optimize a model with 8 rows, 11 columns and 24 nonzeros
Presolve removed 1 rows and 2 columns
Presolve time: 0.00s
Presolved: 7 rows, 9 columns, 21 nonzeros
Variable types: 0 continuous, 9 integer (9 binary)
Found heuristic solution: objective 10152.062078

Root relaxation: objective 2.483106e+02, 5 iterations, 0.00 seconds

    Nodes    |    Current Node    |     Objective Bounds      |     Work
 Expl Unexpl |  Obj  Depth IntInf | Incumbent    BestBd   Gap | It/Node Time

*    0     0               0     248.3105540  248.31055   0.0%     -    0s

Explored 0 nodes (5 simplex iterations) in 0.00 seconds
Thread count was 2 (of 2 available processors)

Optimal solution found (tolerance 1.00e-04)
Best objective 2.483105540000e+02, best bound 2.483105540000e+02, gap 0.0%
Read MPS format model from file tsp.mps
Reading time = 0.00 seconds
tsp.cmpl: 8 rows, 11 columns, 24 nonzeros
Optimize a model with 8 rows, 11 columns and 24 nonzeros
Presolve removed 1 rows and 2 columns
Presolve time: 0.00s
Presolved: 7 rows, 9 columns, 21 nonzeros
Variable types: 0 continuous, 9 integer (9 binary)
Found heuristic solution: objective 10152.062078

Root relaxation: objective 2.483106e+02, 5 iterations, 0.00 seconds

    Nodes    |    Current Node    |     Objective Bounds      |     Work
 Expl Unexpl |  Obj  Depth IntInf | Incumbent    BestBd   Gap | It/Node Time

*    0     0               0     248.3105540  248.31055   0.0%     -    0s

Explored 0 nodes (5 simplex iterations) in 0.00 seconds
Thread count was 2 (of 2 available processors)

Optimal solution found (tolerance 1.00e-04)
Best objective 2.483105540000e+02, best bound 2.483105540000e+02, gap 0.0%
Read MPS format model from file tsp.mps
Reading time = 0.00 seconds
tsp.cmpl: 8 rows, 11 columns, 24 nonzeros
Optimize a model with 8 rows, 11 columns and 24 nonzeros
Presolve removed 1 rows and 2 columns
Presolve time: 0.00s
Presolved: 7 rows, 9 columns, 21 nonzeros
Variable types: 0 continuous, 9 integer (9 binary)
Found heuristic solution: objective 10152.062078

Root relaxation: objective 2.483106e+02, 5 iterations, 0.00 seconds

    Nodes    |    Current Node    |     Objective Bounds      |     Work
 Expl Unexpl |  Obj  Depth IntInf | Incumbent    BestBd   Gap | It/Node Time

*    0     0               0     248.3105540  248.31055   0.0%     -    0s

Explored 0 nodes (5 simplex iterations) in 0.00 seconds
Thread count was 2 (of 2 available processors)

Optimal solution found (tolerance 1.00e-04)
Best objective 2.483105540000e+02, best bound 2.483105540000e+02, gap 0.0%
