--- Job acc-tight-1 Start 08/20/08 23:39:18 GAMS Rev 227 Copyright (C) 1987-2008 GAMS Development. All rights reserved Licensee: Stefan Vigerske G071106/0001CB-LNX Humboldt University Berlin, Numerical Mathematics DC5918 --- Starting compilation --- acc-tight-1.gms(106) 2 Mb --- GDXin=/home/stefan/work/gams/models/LINlib/acc-tight-1.gdx --- acc-tight-1.gms(148) 4 Mb --- Starting execution: elapsed 0:00:00.036 --- acc-tight-1.gms(123) 4 Mb --- Generating MIP model m --- acc-tight-1.gms(124) 5 Mb --- 2,521 rows 1,621 columns 15,329 non-zeroes --- 1,620 discrete-columns --- acc-tight-1.gms(124) 5 Mb --- Executing COINCBC: elapsed 0:00:00.090 GAMS/CoinCbc 2.0 LP/MIP Solver written by J. Forrest Problem statistics: 1620 columns and 2520 rows. 1620 variables have integrality restrictions. Calling CBC main solution routine... Coin Cbc and Clp Solver version 2.00.00, build Mar 20 2008 command line - GAMS/CBC -solve -quit Continuous objective value is 0 - 0.32 seconds processed model has 2520 rows, 1620 columns (1620 integer) and 15327 elements Objective coefficients multiple of 1 Cutoff increment increased from 1e-05 to 0.999 Pass 1: obj. 63.65407 --> up = 24 , down = 3 Pass 2: obj. 46.03991 --> up = 12 , down = 1 Pass 3: obj. 37.55049 --> up = 5 , down = 1 Pass 4: obj. 34.21802 --> up = 1 , down = 0 Pass 5: obj. 33.50046 --> up = 0 , down = 0 -- rand = 27 ( 27) Pass 6: obj. 34.00000 --> up = 9 , down = 9 Pass 7: obj. 19.16537 --> up = 5 , down = 5 Pass 8: obj. 15.09242 --> up = 1 , down = 0 Pass 9: obj. 14.36137 --> up = 0 , down = 0 -- rand = 15 ( 15) Pass 10: obj. 18.79795 --> up = 4 , down = 6 Pass 11: obj. 13.88664 --> up = 1 , down = 1 Pass 12: obj. 13.24197 --> up = 0 , down = 0 -- rand = 24 ( 24) Pass 13: obj. 23.23460 --> up = 6 , down = 10 Pass 14: obj. 10.00000 --> up = 6 , down = 4 - solution found of 0 Before mini branch and bound, 569 integers at bound fixed and 0 continuous Full problem 2520 rows 1620 columns, reduced to 1966 rows 1048 columns - too large Mini branch and bound did not improve solution (5.42 seconds) After 5.42 seconds - Feasibility pump exiting - took 5.41 seconds Integer solution of 0 found by feasibility pump after 0 iterations and 0 nodes (5.50 seconds) Search completed - best objective 0, took 0 iterations and 0 nodes (5.51 seconds) Maximum depth 0, 0 variables fixed on reduced cost Cuts at root node changed objective from 0 to 0 Probing was tried 0 times and created 0 cuts of which 0 were active after adding rounds of cuts (0.000 seconds) Gomory was tried 0 times and created 0 cuts of which 0 were active after adding rounds of cuts (0.000 seconds) Knapsack was tried 0 times and created 0 cuts of which 0 were active after adding rounds of cuts (0.000 seconds) Clique was tried 0 times and created 0 cuts of which 0 were active after adding rounds of cuts (0.000 seconds) MixedIntegerRounding2 was tried 0 times and created 0 cuts of which 0 were active after adding rounds of cuts (0.000 seconds) FlowCover was tried 0 times and created 0 cuts of which 0 were active after adding rounds of cuts (0.000 seconds) TwoMirCuts was tried 0 times and created 0 cuts of which 0 were active after adding rounds of cuts (0.000 seconds) Result - Finished objective 0 after 0 nodes and 0 iterations - took 5.69 seconds (total time 6.01) Total time 6.05 Solved to optimality. Writing solution. Objective: 0 Time: 6.05 s --- Restarting execution --- acc-tight-1.gms(124) 0 Mb --- Reading solution for model m *** Status: Normal completion --- Job acc-tight-1.gms Stop 08/20/08 23:39:24 elapsed 0:00:06.233