--- Job neos2 Start 07/18/08 13:16:27 GAMS Rev 227 Copyright (C) 1987-2008 GAMS Development. All rights reserved Licensee: Stefan Vigerske G071106/0001CB-LNX Humboldt University Berlin, Numerical Mathematics DC5918 --- Starting compilation --- neos2.gms(106) 2 Mb --- GDXin=/home/stefan/work/gams/models/LINlib/neos2.gdx --- neos2.gms(148) 3 Mb --- Starting execution: elapsed 0:00:00.041 --- neos2.gms(123) 4 Mb --- Generating MIP model m --- neos2.gms(124) 4 Mb --- 1,104 rows 2,102 columns 7,331 non-zeroes --- 1,040 discrete-columns --- Executing Cbc: elapsed 0:00:00.090 GAMS/Cbc 2.1 LP/MIP Solver written by J. Forrest Reading parameter(s) from "/home/stefan/work/gams/benchmarks/LINLib.MIP/cbc.op2" >> threads 2 Finished reading from "/home/stefan/work/gams/benchmarks/LINLib.MIP/cbc.op2" Problem statistics: 2101 columns and 1103 rows. 1040 variables have integrality restrictions. Calling CBC main solution routine... Coin Cbc and Clp Solver version 2.10.00, build Jul 15 2008 command line - GAMS/CBC -threads 2 -solve -quit threads was changed from 0 to 2 Continuous objective value is -4717.67 - 0.02 seconds 0 fixed, 0 tightened bounds, 64 strengthened rows, 0 substitutions 0 fixed, 0 tightened bounds, 54 strengthened rows, 0 substitutions processed model has 1086 rows, 2084 columns (1027 integer) and 7729 elements Pass 1: suminf. 2.22170 obj. -4159.86 iterations 800 Pass 2: suminf. 2.16149 obj. -4167.25 iterations 172 Pass 3: suminf. 4.13652 obj. -1942.67 iterations 290 Pass 4: suminf. 3.23914 obj. 713.181 iterations 229 Pass 5: suminf. 2.82330 obj. -219.65 iterations 4 Pass 6: suminf. 3.92611 obj. 239.402 iterations 120 Pass 7: suminf. 8.80395 obj. 2323.86 iterations 59 Pass 8: suminf. 2.30464 obj. 423.722 iterations 107 Pass 9: suminf. 2.05107 obj. 683.676 iterations 317 Pass 10: suminf. 4.25069 obj. -325.295 iterations 464 Pass 11: suminf. 1.99470 obj. -94.7434 iterations 344 Pass 12: suminf. 2.29947 obj. -191.438 iterations 410 Pass 13: suminf. 3.82381 obj. -782.76 iterations 147 Pass 14: suminf. 2.76538 obj. -300.835 iterations 298 Pass 15: suminf. 5.54589 obj. -50.5993 iterations 47 Pass 16: suminf. 1.32987 obj. -1122.5 iterations 148 Pass 17: suminf. 1.27469 obj. -1040.62 iterations 80 Pass 18: suminf. 3.19021 obj. 1433.04 iterations 222 Pass 19: suminf. 1.52848 obj. 234.894 iterations 228 Pass 20: suminf. 1.47194 obj. 35.547 iterations 323 No solution found this major pass Before mini branch and bound, 961 integers at bound fixed and 924 continuous Full problem 1086 rows 2084 columns, reduced to 163 rows 194 columns Mini branch and bound did not improve solution (0.62 seconds) Full problem 1087 rows 2084 columns, reduced to 1087 rows 2084 columns - too large After 0.69 seconds - Feasibility pump exiting - took 0.69 seconds 28 added rows had average density of 526.643 At root node, 28 cuts changed objective from -4562.25 to -3870.7 in 26 passes Cut generator 0 (Probing) - 10 row cuts (1 active), 0 column cuts in 0.800 seconds - new frequency is 2 Cut generator 1 (Gomory) - 596 row cuts (23 active), 0 column cuts in 0.144 seconds - new frequency is 1 Cut generator 2 (Knapsack) - 0 row cuts (0 active), 0 column cuts in 0.080 seconds - new frequency is -100 Cut generator 3 (Clique) - 0 row cuts (0 active), 0 column cuts in 0.016 seconds - new frequency is -100 Cut generator 4 (MixedIntegerRounding2) - 4 row cuts (2 active), 0 column cuts in 0.092 seconds - new frequency is -100 Cut generator 5 (FlowCover) - 4 row cuts (0 active), 0 column cuts in 1.052 seconds - new frequency is -100 Cut generator 6 (TwoMirCuts) - 48 row cuts (2 active), 0 column cuts in 0.080 seconds - new frequency is -100 After 0 nodes, 1 on tree, 1e+50 best solution, best possible -3870.7 (4.03 seconds) After 100 nodes, 19 on tree, 1e+50 best solution, best possible -3870.63 (9.00 seconds) After 200 nodes, 49 on tree, 1e+50 best solution, best possible -3870.63 (11.43 seconds) After 300 nodes, 8 on tree, 1e+50 best solution, best possible -3870.63 (13.54 seconds) After 400 nodes, 20 on tree, 1e+50 best solution, best possible -3870.63 (16.27 seconds) After 500 nodes, 17 on tree, 1e+50 best solution, best possible -3870.63 (18.27 seconds) After 600 nodes, 30 on tree, 1e+50 best solution, best possible -3870.63 (20.41 seconds) After 700 nodes, 35 on tree, 1e+50 best solution, best possible -3870.63 (22.25 seconds) After 800 nodes, 33 on tree, 1e+50 best solution, best possible -3870.63 (23.99 seconds) After 900 nodes, 30 on tree, 1e+50 best solution, best possible -3870.63 (25.76 seconds) After 1000 nodes, 32 on tree, 1e+50 best solution, best possible -3870.63 (27.40 seconds) After 1100 nodes, 28 on tree, 1e+50 best solution, best possible -3870.63 (29.52 seconds) After 1200 nodes, 38 on tree, 1e+50 best solution, best possible -3870.63 (31.37 seconds) After 1300 nodes, 61 on tree, 1e+50 best solution, best possible -3870.63 (33.09 seconds) After 1400 nodes, 41 on tree, 1e+50 best solution, best possible -3870.63 (34.97 seconds) After 1500 nodes, 46 on tree, 1e+50 best solution, best possible -3870.63 (36.61 seconds) After 1600 nodes, 39 on tree, 1e+50 best solution, best possible -3870.63 (38.32 seconds) After 1700 nodes, 45 on tree, 1e+50 best solution, best possible -3870.63 (40.19 seconds) After 1800 nodes, 39 on tree, 1e+50 best solution, best possible -3870.63 (41.67 seconds) After 1900 nodes, 39 on tree, 1e+50 best solution, best possible -3870.63 (42.90 seconds) After 2000 nodes, 38 on tree, 1e+50 best solution, best possible -3870.63 (44.16 seconds) After 2100 nodes, 38 on tree, 1e+50 best solution, best possible -3870.63 (45.45 seconds) After 2200 nodes, 47 on tree, 1e+50 best solution, best possible -3870.63 (47.13 seconds) After 2300 nodes, 51 on tree, 1e+50 best solution, best possible -3870.63 (48.85 seconds) After 2400 nodes, 44 on tree, 1e+50 best solution, best possible -3870.63 (50.19 seconds) After 2500 nodes, 24 on tree, 1e+50 best solution, best possible -3870.63 (51.52 seconds) After 2600 nodes, 31 on tree, 1e+50 best solution, best possible -3870.63 (52.58 seconds) After 2700 nodes, 26 on tree, 1e+50 best solution, best possible -3870.63 (53.74 seconds) After 2800 nodes, 23 on tree, 1e+50 best solution, best possible -3870.63 (54.85 seconds) After 2900 nodes, 23 on tree, 1e+50 best solution, best possible -3870.63 (55.87 seconds) After 3000 nodes, 22 on tree, 1e+50 best solution, best possible -3870.63 (56.81 seconds) After 3100 nodes, 19 on tree, 1e+50 best solution, best possible -3870.63 (57.78 seconds) After 3200 nodes, 24 on tree, 1e+50 best solution, best possible -3870.63 (58.64 seconds) After 3300 nodes, 21 on tree, 1e+50 best solution, best possible -3870.63 (59.72 seconds) After 3400 nodes, 23 on tree, 1e+50 best solution, best possible -3870.63 (60.95 seconds) After 3500 nodes, 16 on tree, 1e+50 best solution, best possible -3870.63 (61.97 seconds) After 3600 nodes, 26 on tree, 1e+50 best solution, best possible -3870.63 (63.04 seconds) After 3700 nodes, 34 on tree, 1e+50 best solution, best possible -3870.63 (64.11 seconds) After 3800 nodes, 15 on tree, 1e+50 best solution, best possible -3870.63 (65.06 seconds) After 3900 nodes, 21 on tree, 1e+50 best solution, best possible -3870.63 (66.06 seconds) After 4000 nodes, 18 on tree, 1e+50 best solution, best possible -3870.63 (66.95 seconds) After 4100 nodes, 28 on tree, 1e+50 best solution, best possible -3870.63 (68.06 seconds) After 4200 nodes, 21 on tree, 1e+50 best solution, best possible -3870.63 (68.99 seconds) After 4300 nodes, 28 on tree, 1e+50 best solution, best possible -3870.63 (69.92 seconds) After 4400 nodes, 26 on tree, 1e+50 best solution, best possible -3870.63 (70.89 seconds) After 4500 nodes, 29 on tree, 1e+50 best solution, best possible -3870.63 (71.76 seconds) After 4600 nodes, 21 on tree, 1e+50 best solution, best possible -3870.63 (72.86 seconds) After 4700 nodes, 23 on tree, 1e+50 best solution, best possible -3870.63 (73.85 seconds) After 4800 nodes, 25 on tree, 1e+50 best solution, best possible -3870.63 (74.78 seconds) After 4900 nodes, 25 on tree, 1e+50 best solution, best possible -3870.63 (75.80 seconds) After 5000 nodes, 23 on tree, 1e+50 best solution, best possible -3870.63 (76.80 seconds) Cbc0004I Integer solution of 1372.49 found after 88852 iterations and 5084 nodes (77.56 seconds) After 5100 nodes, 42 on tree, 1372.49 best solution, best possible -3870.62 (78.64 seconds) After 5200 nodes, 44 on tree, 1372.49 best solution, best possible -3870.62 (81.67 seconds) After 5300 nodes, 47 on tree, 1372.49 best solution, best possible -3870.62 (83.27 seconds) After 5400 nodes, 59 on tree, 1372.49 best solution, best possible -3870.62 (86.07 seconds) After 5500 nodes, 60 on tree, 1372.49 best solution, best possible -3870.62 (88.07 seconds) After 5600 nodes, 59 on tree, 1372.49 best solution, best possible -3870.62 (89.77 seconds) After 5700 nodes, 62 on tree, 1372.49 best solution, best possible -3870.62 (91.22 seconds) After 5800 nodes, 67 on tree, 1372.49 best solution, best possible -3870.62 (92.97 seconds) After 5900 nodes, 71 on tree, 1372.49 best solution, best possible -3870.62 (94.61 seconds) After 6000 nodes, 91 on tree, 1372.49 best solution, best possible -3870.62 (96.60 seconds) After 6100 nodes, 99 on tree, 1372.49 best solution, best possible -3870.62 (98.85 seconds) After 6200 nodes, 98 on tree, 1372.49 best solution, best possible -3870.62 (99.72 seconds) After 6300 nodes, 101 on tree, 1372.49 best solution, best possible -3870.62 (100.95 seconds) After 6400 nodes, 102 on tree, 1372.49 best solution, best possible -3870.62 (102.73 seconds) After 6500 nodes, 105 on tree, 1372.49 best solution, best possible -3870.62 (104.19 seconds) After 6600 nodes, 108 on tree, 1372.49 best solution, best possible -3870.62 (105.44 seconds) After 6700 nodes, 124 on tree, 1372.49 best solution, best possible -3870.62 (107.24 seconds) After 6800 nodes, 129 on tree, 1372.49 best solution, best possible -3870.62 (108.65 seconds) After 6900 nodes, 160 on tree, 1372.49 best solution, best possible -3870.62 (110.67 seconds) After 7000 nodes, 183 on tree, 1372.49 best solution, best possible -3870.62 (112.70 seconds) After 7100 nodes, 198 on tree, 1372.49 best solution, best possible -3870.62 (114.54 seconds) After 7200 nodes, 205 on tree, 1372.49 best solution, best possible -3870.62 (115.98 seconds) After 7300 nodes, 212 on tree, 1372.49 best solution, best possible -3870.62 (117.42 seconds) After 7400 nodes, 215 on tree, 1372.49 best solution, best possible -3870.62 (118.85 seconds) After 7500 nodes, 229 on tree, 1372.49 best solution, best possible -3870.62 (120.25 seconds) After 7600 nodes, 242 on tree, 1372.49 best solution, best possible -3870.62 (121.82 seconds) After 7700 nodes, 255 on tree, 1372.49 best solution, best possible -3870.62 (123.37 seconds) After 7800 nodes, 268 on tree, 1372.49 best solution, best possible -3870.62 (124.89 seconds) After 7900 nodes, 283 on tree, 1372.49 best solution, best possible -3870.62 (126.20 seconds) After 8000 nodes, 287 on tree, 1372.49 best solution, best possible -3870.62 (127.18 seconds) After 8100 nodes, 290 on tree, 1372.49 best solution, best possible -3870.62 (128.35 seconds) After 8200 nodes, 296 on tree, 1372.49 best solution, best possible -3870.62 (129.73 seconds) After 8300 nodes, 315 on tree, 1372.49 best solution, best possible -3870.62 (131.32 seconds) After 8400 nodes, 325 on tree, 1372.49 best solution, best possible -3870.62 (132.42 seconds) After 8500 nodes, 332 on tree, 1372.49 best solution, best possible -3870.62 (133.43 seconds) After 8600 nodes, 342 on tree, 1372.49 best solution, best possible -3870.62 (134.76 seconds) After 8700 nodes, 351 on tree, 1372.49 best solution, best possible -3870.62 (135.80 seconds) After 8800 nodes, 354 on tree, 1372.49 best solution, best possible -3870.62 (136.90 seconds) After 8900 nodes, 363 on tree, 1372.49 best solution, best possible -3870.62 (138.18 seconds) After 9000 nodes, 365 on tree, 1372.49 best solution, best possible -3870.62 (139.16 seconds) After 9100 nodes, 378 on tree, 1372.49 best solution, best possible -3870.62 (140.33 seconds) After 9200 nodes, 392 on tree, 1372.49 best solution, best possible -3870.62 (141.45 seconds) After 9300 nodes, 417 on tree, 1372.49 best solution, best possible -3870.62 (142.64 seconds) After 9400 nodes, 424 on tree, 1372.49 best solution, best possible -3870.62 (143.84 seconds) After 9500 nodes, 431 on tree, 1372.49 best solution, best possible -3870.62 (145.15 seconds) After 9600 nodes, 455 on tree, 1372.49 best solution, best possible -3870.62 (146.54 seconds) After 9700 nodes, 462 on tree, 1372.49 best solution, best possible -3870.62 (147.87 seconds) After 9800 nodes, 468 on tree, 1372.49 best solution, best possible -3870.62 (149.02 seconds) After 9900 nodes, 482 on tree, 1372.49 best solution, best possible -3870.62 (150.10 seconds) After 10000 nodes, 488 on tree, 1372.49 best solution, best possible -3870.62 (150.99 seconds) After 10100 nodes, 491 on tree, 1372.49 best solution, best possible -3870.62 (152.13 seconds) After 10200 nodes, 493 on tree, 1372.49 best solution, best possible -3870.62 (153.53 seconds) After 10300 nodes, 494 on tree, 1372.49 best solution, best possible -3870.62 (154.55 seconds) After 10400 nodes, 503 on tree, 1372.49 best solution, best possible -3870.62 (155.40 seconds) After 10500 nodes, 506 on tree, 1372.49 best solution, best possible -3870.62 (156.22 seconds) After 10600 nodes, 516 on tree, 1372.49 best solution, best possible -3870.62 (157.23 seconds) After 10700 nodes, 514 on tree, 1372.49 best solution, best possible -3870.62 (158.02 seconds) After 10800 nodes, 524 on tree, 1372.49 best solution, best possible -3870.62 (159.25 seconds) After 10900 nodes, 529 on tree, 1372.49 best solution, best possible -3870.62 (160.35 seconds) After 11000 nodes, 533 on tree, 1372.49 best solution, best possible -3870.62 (161.25 seconds) After 11100 nodes, 546 on tree, 1372.49 best solution, best possible -1398.62 (162.67 seconds) After 11200 nodes, 553 on tree, 1372.49 best solution, best possible -1331.95 (163.89 seconds) After 11300 nodes, 577 on tree, 1372.49 best solution, best possible -1292.74 (164.89 seconds) After 11400 nodes, 591 on tree, 1372.49 best solution, best possible -1258.05 (165.91 seconds) After 11500 nodes, 610 on tree, 1372.49 best solution, best possible -1229.17 (167.03 seconds) After 11600 nodes, 625 on tree, 1372.49 best solution, best possible -1208.47 (167.99 seconds) After 11700 nodes, 635 on tree, 1372.49 best solution, best possible -1194.63 (169.03 seconds) After 11800 nodes, 646 on tree, 1372.49 best solution, best possible -1174.63 (170.16 seconds) After 11900 nodes, 666 on tree, 1372.49 best solution, best possible -1150.97 (171.31 seconds) After 12000 nodes, 687 on tree, 1372.49 best solution, best possible -1137 (172.41 seconds) After 12100 nodes, 701 on tree, 1372.49 best solution, best possible -1126.75 (173.52 seconds) After 12200 nodes, 712 on tree, 1372.49 best solution, best possible -1115.15 (174.52 seconds) After 12300 nodes, 723 on tree, 1372.49 best solution, best possible -1107.48 (175.51 seconds) After 12400 nodes, 734 on tree, 1372.49 best solution, best possible -1095.66 (176.59 seconds) After 12500 nodes, 753 on tree, 1372.49 best solution, best possible -1079.19 (177.61 seconds) After 12600 nodes, 766 on tree, 1372.49 best solution, best possible -1067.92 (178.74 seconds) After 12700 nodes, 786 on tree, 1372.49 best solution, best possible -1059.46 (179.80 seconds) After 12800 nodes, 805 on tree, 1372.49 best solution, best possible -1050.71 (180.85 seconds) After 12900 nodes, 818 on tree, 1372.49 best solution, best possible -1042.76 (181.86 seconds) After 13000 nodes, 834 on tree, 1372.49 best solution, best possible -1034.7 (182.91 seconds) After 13100 nodes, 839 on tree, 1372.49 best solution, best possible -1034.7 (183.70 seconds) After 13200 nodes, 843 on tree, 1372.49 best solution, best possible -1034.7 (184.58 seconds) After 13300 nodes, 847 on tree, 1372.49 best solution, best possible -1034.7 (185.55 seconds) After 13400 nodes, 862 on tree, 1372.49 best solution, best possible -1034.7 (186.48 seconds) After 13500 nodes, 868 on tree, 1372.49 best solution, best possible -1034.38 (187.46 seconds) After 13600 nodes, 880 on tree, 1372.49 best solution, best possible -1034.38 (188.40 seconds) After 13700 nodes, 890 on tree, 1372.49 best solution, best possible -1034.38 (189.41 seconds) After 13800 nodes, 904 on tree, 1372.49 best solution, best possible -1034.38 (190.30 seconds) After 13900 nodes, 910 on tree, 1372.49 best solution, best possible -1034.38 (191.35 seconds) After 14000 nodes, 915 on tree, 1372.49 best solution, best possible -1034.38 (192.29 seconds) After 14100 nodes, 929 on tree, 1372.49 best solution, best possible -1027.59 (193.38 seconds) After 14200 nodes, 936 on tree, 1372.49 best solution, best possible -1019.61 (194.57 seconds) After 14300 nodes, 940 on tree, 1372.49 best solution, best possible -1008.07 (195.55 seconds) After 14400 nodes, 948 on tree, 1372.49 best solution, best possible -998.488 (196.62 seconds) After 14500 nodes, 962 on tree, 1372.49 best solution, best possible -990.015 (197.56 seconds) After 14600 nodes, 968 on tree, 1372.49 best solution, best possible -986.352 (198.88 seconds) After 14700 nodes, 976 on tree, 1372.49 best solution, best possible -975.481 (199.94 seconds) After 14800 nodes, 990 on tree, 1372.49 best solution, best possible -965.559 (201.08 seconds) After 14900 nodes, 1005 on tree, 1372.49 best solution, best possible -953.441 (202.20 seconds) After 15000 nodes, 1022 on tree, 1372.49 best solution, best possible -938.51 (203.23 seconds) After 15100 nodes, 1039 on tree, 1372.49 best solution, best possible -923.439 (204.26 seconds) After 15200 nodes, 1046 on tree, 1372.49 best solution, best possible -910.596 (205.28 seconds) After 15300 nodes, 1055 on tree, 1372.49 best solution, best possible -899.706 (206.42 seconds) After 15400 nodes, 1058 on tree, 1372.49 best solution, best possible -884.332 (207.41 seconds) After 15500 nodes, 1070 on tree, 1372.49 best solution, best possible -869.439 (208.38 seconds) After 15600 nodes, 1078 on tree, 1372.49 best solution, best possible -857.705 (209.29 seconds) After 15700 nodes, 1086 on tree, 1372.49 best solution, best possible -842.359 (210.37 seconds) After 15800 nodes, 1095 on tree, 1372.49 best solution, best possible -821.501 (211.39 seconds) After 15900 nodes, 1108 on tree, 1372.49 best solution, best possible -806.694 (212.45 seconds) After 16000 nodes, 1116 on tree, 1372.49 best solution, best possible -793.312 (213.43 seconds) After 16100 nodes, 1134 on tree, 1372.49 best solution, best possible -782.37 (214.34 seconds) After 16200 nodes, 1156 on tree, 1372.49 best solution, best possible -768.214 (215.18 seconds) After 16300 nodes, 1166 on tree, 1372.49 best solution, best possible -760.058 (216.11 seconds) After 16400 nodes, 1176 on tree, 1372.49 best solution, best possible -753.502 (217.01 seconds) After 16500 nodes, 1181 on tree, 1372.49 best solution, best possible -747.676 (218.01 seconds) After 16600 nodes, 1190 on tree, 1372.49 best solution, best possible -739.351 (218.93 seconds) After 16700 nodes, 1196 on tree, 1372.49 best solution, best possible -731.957 (219.89 seconds) After 16800 nodes, 1203 on tree, 1372.49 best solution, best possible -724.742 (220.90 seconds) After 16900 nodes, 1209 on tree, 1372.49 best solution, best possible -717.055 (221.87 seconds) After 17000 nodes, 1221 on tree, 1372.49 best solution, best possible -708.058 (222.85 seconds) After 17100 nodes, 1232 on tree, 1372.49 best solution, best possible -708.112 (223.79 seconds) After 17200 nodes, 1236 on tree, 1372.49 best solution, best possible -708.112 (224.77 seconds) After 17300 nodes, 1244 on tree, 1372.49 best solution, best possible -708.112 (225.72 seconds) After 17400 nodes, 1253 on tree, 1372.49 best solution, best possible -708.112 (226.68 seconds) After 17500 nodes, 1264 on tree, 1372.49 best solution, best possible -708.058 (227.53 seconds) After 17600 nodes, 1276 on tree, 1372.49 best solution, best possible -708.058 (228.49 seconds) After 17700 nodes, 1284 on tree, 1372.49 best solution, best possible -708.058 (229.28 seconds) After 17800 nodes, 1290 on tree, 1372.49 best solution, best possible -708.058 (230.25 seconds) After 17900 nodes, 1299 on tree, 1372.49 best solution, best possible -708.058 (231.20 seconds) After 18000 nodes, 1317 on tree, 1372.49 best solution, best possible -708.058 (232.19 seconds) After 18100 nodes, 1335 on tree, 1372.49 best solution, best possible -701.399 (233.01 seconds) After 18200 nodes, 1355 on tree, 1372.49 best solution, best possible -696.038 (233.90 seconds) After 18300 nodes, 1367 on tree, 1372.49 best solution, best possible -690.316 (234.90 seconds) After 18400 nodes, 1372 on tree, 1372.49 best solution, best possible -682.587 (235.97 seconds) After 18500 nodes, 1381 on tree, 1372.49 best solution, best possible -672.028 (236.87 seconds) After 18600 nodes, 1392 on tree, 1372.49 best solution, best possible -662.902 (237.77 seconds) After 18700 nodes, 1400 on tree, 1372.49 best solution, best possible -649.653 (238.79 seconds) After 18800 nodes, 1410 on tree, 1372.49 best solution, best possible -636.863 (239.85 seconds) After 18900 nodes, 1412 on tree, 1372.49 best solution, best possible -630.09 (240.76 seconds) After 19000 nodes, 1422 on tree, 1372.49 best solution, best possible -623.707 (241.65 seconds) After 19100 nodes, 1440 on tree, 1372.49 best solution, best possible -618.432 (242.59 seconds) After 19200 nodes, 1459 on tree, 1372.49 best solution, best possible -612.483 (243.45 seconds) After 19300 nodes, 1473 on tree, 1372.49 best solution, best possible -606.373 (244.38 seconds) After 19400 nodes, 1479 on tree, 1372.49 best solution, best possible -598.799 (245.29 seconds) After 19500 nodes, 1489 on tree, 1372.49 best solution, best possible -594.418 (246.12 seconds) After 19600 nodes, 1500 on tree, 1372.49 best solution, best possible -588.666 (247.07 seconds) After 19700 nodes, 1513 on tree, 1372.49 best solution, best possible -579.879 (247.92 seconds) After 19800 nodes, 1518 on tree, 1372.49 best solution, best possible -573.87 (248.88 seconds) After 19900 nodes, 1532 on tree, 1372.49 best solution, best possible -569.197 (249.76 seconds) After 20000 nodes, 1545 on tree, 1372.49 best solution, best possible -559.594 (250.69 seconds) After 20100 nodes, 1565 on tree, 1372.49 best solution, best possible -551.844 (251.64 seconds) After 20200 nodes, 1581 on tree, 1372.49 best solution, best possible -544.892 (252.58 seconds) After 20300 nodes, 1597 on tree, 1372.49 best solution, best possible -538.213 (253.55 seconds) After 20400 nodes, 1614 on tree, 1372.49 best solution, best possible -532.574 (254.39 seconds) After 20500 nodes, 1629 on tree, 1372.49 best solution, best possible -529.097 (255.29 seconds) After 20600 nodes, 1634 on tree, 1372.49 best solution, best possible -526.037 (256.24 seconds) After 20700 nodes, 1645 on tree, 1372.49 best solution, best possible -519.737 (257.15 seconds) After 20800 nodes, 1653 on tree, 1372.49 best solution, best possible -515.427 (258.10 seconds) After 20900 nodes, 1666 on tree, 1372.49 best solution, best possible -511.373 (259.13 seconds) After 21000 nodes, 1671 on tree, 1372.49 best solution, best possible -509.311 (260.21 seconds) After 21100 nodes, 1676 on tree, 1372.49 best solution, best possible -509.311 (261.15 seconds) After 21200 nodes, 1684 on tree, 1372.49 best solution, best possible -509.311 (261.93 seconds) After 21300 nodes, 1695 on tree, 1372.49 best solution, best possible -509.311 (262.74 seconds) After 21400 nodes, 1706 on tree, 1372.49 best solution, best possible -509.311 (263.72 seconds) After 21500 nodes, 1712 on tree, 1372.49 best solution, best possible -509.311 (264.56 seconds) After 21600 nodes, 1724 on tree, 1372.49 best solution, best possible -509.311 (265.46 seconds) After 21700 nodes, 1731 on tree, 1372.49 best solution, best possible -509.311 (266.29 seconds) After 21800 nodes, 1737 on tree, 1372.49 best solution, best possible -509.311 (267.14 seconds) After 21900 nodes, 1744 on tree, 1372.49 best solution, best possible -509.311 (267.97 seconds) After 22000 nodes, 1758 on tree, 1372.49 best solution, best possible -509.311 (268.94 seconds) After 22100 nodes, 1770 on tree, 1372.49 best solution, best possible -505.183 (269.82 seconds) After 22200 nodes, 1784 on tree, 1372.49 best solution, best possible -500.319 (270.62 seconds) After 22300 nodes, 1798 on tree, 1372.49 best solution, best possible -495.711 (271.47 seconds) After 22400 nodes, 1807 on tree, 1372.49 best solution, best possible -492.814 (272.39 seconds) After 22500 nodes, 1813 on tree, 1372.49 best solution, best possible -488.266 (273.29 seconds) After 22600 nodes, 1820 on tree, 1372.49 best solution, best possible -483.144 (274.24 seconds) After 22700 nodes, 1832 on tree, 1372.49 best solution, best possible -477.737 (275.15 seconds) After 22800 nodes, 1844 on tree, 1372.49 best solution, best possible -473.041 (276.02 seconds) After 22900 nodes, 1866 on tree, 1372.49 best solution, best possible -468.821 (276.95 seconds) After 23000 nodes, 1882 on tree, 1372.49 best solution, best possible -464.739 (277.80 seconds) After 23100 nodes, 1890 on tree, 1372.49 best solution, best possible -462.185 (278.73 seconds) After 23200 nodes, 1891 on tree, 1372.49 best solution, best possible -458.47 (279.61 seconds) After 23300 nodes, 1902 on tree, 1372.49 best solution, best possible -454.046 (280.56 seconds) After 23400 nodes, 1913 on tree, 1372.49 best solution, best possible -447.609 (281.48 seconds) After 23500 nodes, 1924 on tree, 1372.49 best solution, best possible -442.318 (282.37 seconds) After 23600 nodes, 1929 on tree, 1372.49 best solution, best possible -435.54 (283.31 seconds) After 23700 nodes, 1935 on tree, 1372.49 best solution, best possible -430.554 (284.14 seconds) After 23800 nodes, 1947 on tree, 1372.49 best solution, best possible -426.189 (285.02 seconds) After 23900 nodes, 1957 on tree, 1372.49 best solution, best possible -421.391 (285.95 seconds) After 24000 nodes, 1973 on tree, 1372.49 best solution, best possible -414.571 (286.87 seconds) After 24100 nodes, 1990 on tree, 1372.49 best solution, best possible -409.175 (287.78 seconds) After 24200 nodes, 1992 on tree, 1372.49 best solution, best possible -402.602 (288.63 seconds) After 24300 nodes, 1997 on tree, 1372.49 best solution, best possible -398.533 (289.45 seconds) After 24400 nodes, 2005 on tree, 1372.49 best solution, best possible -392.739 (290.39 seconds) After 24500 nodes, 2013 on tree, 1372.49 best solution, best possible -385.912 (291.27 seconds) After 24600 nodes, 2026 on tree, 1372.49 best solution, best possible -379.631 (292.11 seconds) After 24700 nodes, 2028 on tree, 1372.49 best solution, best possible -376.932 (293.02 seconds) After 24800 nodes, 2033 on tree, 1372.49 best solution, best possible -373.02 (293.99 seconds) After 24900 nodes, 2035 on tree, 1372.49 best solution, best possible -371.495 (294.87 seconds) After 25000 nodes, 2045 on tree, 1372.49 best solution, best possible -364.102 (295.76 seconds) After 25100 nodes, 2056 on tree, 1372.49 best solution, best possible -364.102 (296.65 seconds) After 25200 nodes, 2062 on tree, 1372.49 best solution, best possible -364.102 (297.48 seconds) After 25300 nodes, 2066 on tree, 1372.49 best solution, best possible -364.102 (298.37 seconds) After 25400 nodes, 2078 on tree, 1372.49 best solution, best possible -364.102 (299.34 seconds) After 25500 nodes, 2093 on tree, 1372.49 best solution, best possible -364.102 (300.21 seconds) After 25600 nodes, 2100 on tree, 1372.49 best solution, best possible -364.102 (301.00 seconds) After 25700 nodes, 2112 on tree, 1372.49 best solution, best possible -364.102 (301.85 seconds) After 25800 nodes, 2131 on tree, 1372.49 best solution, best possible -364.102 (302.78 seconds) After 25900 nodes, 2143 on tree, 1372.49 best solution, best possible -364.102 (303.62 seconds) After 26000 nodes, 2154 on tree, 1372.49 best solution, best possible -364.102 (304.44 seconds) After 26100 nodes, 2163 on tree, 1372.49 best solution, best possible -356.577 (305.18 seconds) After 26200 nodes, 2166 on tree, 1372.49 best solution, best possible -350.416 (305.96 seconds) After 26300 nodes, 2176 on tree, 1372.49 best solution, best possible -346.297 (306.77 seconds) After 26400 nodes, 2181 on tree, 1372.49 best solution, best possible -341.44 (307.48 seconds) After 26500 nodes, 2187 on tree, 1372.49 best solution, best possible -333.759 (308.27 seconds) After 26600 nodes, 2196 on tree, 1372.49 best solution, best possible -328.612 (309.07 seconds) After 26700 nodes, 2197 on tree, 1372.49 best solution, best possible -322.776 (309.82 seconds) After 26800 nodes, 2206 on tree, 1372.49 best solution, best possible -315.424 (310.62 seconds) After 26900 nodes, 2215 on tree, 1372.49 best solution, best possible -309.602 (311.37 seconds) After 27000 nodes, 2218 on tree, 1372.49 best solution, best possible -303.394 (312.10 seconds) After 27100 nodes, 2227 on tree, 1372.49 best solution, best possible -300.634 (313.03 seconds) After 27200 nodes, 2231 on tree, 1372.49 best solution, best possible -297.42 (313.90 seconds) After 27300 nodes, 2238 on tree, 1372.49 best solution, best possible -292.776 (314.78 seconds) After 27400 nodes, 2240 on tree, 1372.49 best solution, best possible -289.072 (315.57 seconds) After 27500 nodes, 2248 on tree, 1372.49 best solution, best possible -284.899 (316.31 seconds) After 27600 nodes, 2260 on tree, 1372.49 best solution, best possible -278.789 (317.16 seconds) After 27700 nodes, 2258 on tree, 1372.49 best solution, best possible -276.75 (317.95 seconds) After 27800 nodes, 2263 on tree, 1372.49 best solution, best possible -272.666 (318.70 seconds) After 27900 nodes, 2274 on tree, 1372.49 best solution, best possible -268.55 (319.49 seconds) After 28000 nodes, 2279 on tree, 1372.49 best solution, best possible -266.154 (320.19 seconds) After 28100 nodes, 2292 on tree, 1372.49 best solution, best possible -261.988 (321.00 seconds) After 28200 nodes, 2301 on tree, 1372.49 best solution, best possible -257.358 (321.78 seconds) After 28300 nodes, 2318 on tree, 1372.49 best solution, best possible -255.247 (322.64 seconds) After 28400 nodes, 2320 on tree, 1372.49 best solution, best possible -252.517 (323.30 seconds) After 28500 nodes, 2327 on tree, 1372.49 best solution, best possible -250.636 (324.09 seconds) After 28600 nodes, 2334 on tree, 1372.49 best solution, best possible -246.896 (324.72 seconds) After 28700 nodes, 2345 on tree, 1372.49 best solution, best possible -243.954 (325.60 seconds) After 28800 nodes, 2350 on tree, 1372.49 best solution, best possible -241.282 (326.44 seconds) After 28900 nodes, 2355 on tree, 1372.49 best solution, best possible -238.855 (327.23 seconds) After 29000 nodes, 2363 on tree, 1372.49 best solution, best possible -233.569 (327.99 seconds) After 29100 nodes, 2372 on tree, 1372.49 best solution, best possible -233.569 (328.80 seconds) After 29200 nodes, 2386 on tree, 1372.49 best solution, best possible -233.569 (329.63 seconds) After 29300 nodes, 2397 on tree, 1372.49 best solution, best possible -233.569 (330.50 seconds) After 29400 nodes, 2413 on tree, 1372.49 best solution, best possible -233.569 (331.27 seconds) After 29500 nodes, 2423 on tree, 1372.49 best solution, best possible -233.569 (332.12 seconds) Cbc0004I Integer solution of 725.735 found after 683920 iterations and 29594 nodes (332.98 seconds) Cbc0038I Full problem 1086 rows 2084 columns, reduced to 49 rows 41 columns Cbc0038I Full problem 1086 rows 2084 columns, reduced to 85 rows 69 columns Cbc0038I Full problem 1086 rows 2084 columns, reduced to 106 rows 101 columns Cbc0038I Full problem 1086 rows 2084 columns, reduced to 100 rows 92 columns Cbc0038I Full problem 1086 rows 2084 columns, reduced to 100 rows 92 columns Cbc0004I Integer solution of 478.578 found after 908570 iterations and 49920 nodes (476.32 seconds) Cbc0038I Full problem 1086 rows 2084 columns, reduced to 126 rows 132 columns Cbc0038I Full problem 1086 rows 2084 columns, reduced to 100 rows 92 columns Cbc0004I Integer solution of 469.377 found after 938450 iterations and 53983 nodes (511.19 seconds) Cbc0038I Full problem 1086 rows 2084 columns, reduced to 118 rows 120 columns Cbc0038I Full problem 1086 rows 2084 columns, reduced to 126 rows 132 columns Cbc0012I Integer solution of 469.276 found by combine solutions after 938457 iterations and 53985 nodes (514.50 seconds) Cbc0038I Full problem 1086 rows 2084 columns, reduced to 126 rows 132 columns Cbc0038I Full problem 1086 rows 2084 columns, reduced to 138 rows 152 columns Cbc0038I Full problem 1086 rows 2084 columns, reduced to 156 rows 182 columns Cbc0038I Full problem 1086 rows 2084 columns, reduced to 158 rows 186 columns Cbc0038I Full problem 1086 rows 2084 columns, reduced to 133 rows 144 columns Cbc0012I Integer solution of 460.598 found by combine solutions after 1101256 iterations and 85203 nodes (754.64 seconds) Cbc0038I Full problem 1086 rows 2084 columns, reduced to 158 rows 186 columns Cbc0004I Integer solution of 459.655 found after 1122069 iterations and 89699 nodes (786.92 seconds) Cbc0038I Full problem 1086 rows 2084 columns, reduced to 158 rows 186 columns Cbc0038I Full problem 1086 rows 2084 columns, reduced to 139 rows 157 columns Cbc0038I Full problem 1086 rows 2084 columns, reduced to 142 rows 165 columns Cbc0038I Full problem 1086 rows 2084 columns, reduced to 158 rows 186 columns Cbc0038I Full problem 1086 rows 2084 columns, reduced to 166 rows 201 columns Solved to optimality. wallclocktime: 455.946 used seconds: 878.82 MIP solution: 454.864697 (100764 nodes, 878.82 seconds) Best possible: 454.864697 Absolute gap: 2.9104e-11 (absolute tolerance optca: 0) Relative gap: 6.3983e-14 (relative tolerance optcr: 0) --- Restarting execution --- neos2.gms(124) 0 Mb --- Reading solution for model m --- neos2.gms(124) 3 Mb *** Status: Normal completion --- Job neos2.gms Stop 07/18/08 13:24:03 elapsed 0:07:36.077