Resource Times:

Date / Time: 08/24/07 21:45:33


See the solver return definitions for optimal/feasible model and solve statuses. Solutions are not checked for how close they are to eachother. Resource times are considered the same, if they are within 10% of eachother. A solver is considered faster than another, if it is less than 50% faster than the other. A solver is considered much faster than another, if it is more than 50% faster than the other.

If a model was not solved optimal/feasible by both solvers, the resource time is considered the same. If a model was solved optimal/feasible by solver A but not by solver B, then solver A is considered infinitely faster than solver B. Similarly, if one solver has trace data and the other has no data, then the first solver is consideredinfinitely faster.

A solver is considered to have a better objective function value, if the relative objective value difference is greater than 1.00E-05 For objective values below 1e-1 we use absolute differences.

Tracefile 1 :5-LaGO-1.trc.convex
Tracefile 2 :6-SBB-1.trc.convex
Solvers used : LaGO
SBB
Modeltype(s)   MINLP
Threshold: Solver Faster 10%
Threshold: Solver Much Faster 50%
Threshold: Solver Infinitely Faster Other solver failed


Total Obj LaGO better Obj same Obj SBB better
Solver LaGO infinitely faster :- - - -
Solver LaGO much faster : 1 - - 1
Solver LaGO faster :- - - -
Solvers perform the same : 13 1 12 -
Solver SBB faster : 9 1 8 -
Solver SBB much faster : 11 8 3 -
Solver SBB infinitely faster : 1 - - 1
Both solvers failed to solve optimally : 5 - 5 -
Total models: : 4010282




Solver return definition:

OutcomeModel StatusSolver Status
globally optimal 1 or 15 1
locally optimal/feasible 2 or 8 or 16 1 or 2 or 3 or 4 or 5




Resource Times:

Back to top

Solver LaGO much faster - Obj of SBB better:

Modelname Time (LaGO) Time (SBB) Ratio (LaGO / SBB) Obj (LaGO) Obj (SBB)
du-opt52.697020.82000.130 8.11482737E+00 8.07365758E+00

Back to top



Back to top

Solvers perform the same - Obj of LaGO better:

Modelname Time (LaGO) Time (SBB) Ratio (LaGO / SBB) Obj (LaGO) Obj (SBB)
st_testgr10.08900.0400--- -1.27859500E+01 -1.27281000E+01

Back to top



Back to top

Solvers perform the same - Obj same for both solvers:

Modelname Time (LaGO) Time (SBB) Ratio (LaGO / SBB) Obj (LaGO) Obj (SBB)
alan0.09300.0100--- 2.92500000E+00 2.92500000E+00
ex1223a0.07300.0100--- 4.57958240E+00 4.57958240E+00
gbd0.05100.0000--- 2.20000000E+00 2.20000000E+00
nvs030.04100.0200--- 1.60000000E+01 1.60000000E+01
nvs100.06200.0200--- -3.10800000E+02 -3.10800000E+02
st_e140.10500.0200--- 4.57958240E+00 4.57958240E+00
st_miqp10.05200.0300--- 2.81000000E+02 2.81000000E+02
st_miqp20.05700.0300--- 2.00000000E+00 2.00000000E+00
st_miqp30.03800.0000--- -6.00000000E+00 -6.00000000E+00
st_miqp50.08500.0000--- -3.33888889E+02 -3.33888889E+02
st_testph40.04600.0200--- -8.05000000E+01 -8.05000000E+01
synthes10.12900.0300--- 6.00975891E+00 6.00975891E+00

Back to top



Back to top

Solver SBB faster - Obj of LaGO better:

Modelname Time (LaGO) Time (SBB) Ratio (LaGO / SBB) Obj (LaGO) Obj (SBB)
meanvarx0.14000.0200--- 1.43692321E+01 1.44969830E+01

Back to top



Back to top

Solver SBB faster - Obj same for both solvers:

Modelname Time (LaGO) Time (SBB) Ratio (LaGO / SBB) Obj (LaGO) Obj (SBB)
ex12230.11000.06001.833 4.57958240E+00 4.57958240E+00
ex1223b0.10200.0000--- 4.57958240E+00 4.57958240E+00
m30.60600.40001.515 3.78000000E+01 3.78000000E+01
st_test50.08300.06001.383 -1.10000000E+02 -1.10000000E+02
st_test60.10200.09001.133 4.71000000E+02 4.71000000E+02
st_test80.14800.0100--- -2.96050000E+04 -2.96050000E+04
synthes20.19000.0400--- 7.30353125E+01 7.30353125E+01
synthes30.29400.18001.633 6.80097405E+01 6.80097405E+01

Back to top



Back to top

Solver SBB much faster - Obj of LaGO better:

Modelname Time (LaGO) Time (SBB) Ratio (LaGO / SBB) Obj (LaGO) Obj (SBB)
du-opt1388.32401.7400797.887 3.55980073E+00 3.56108965E+00
m61119.1750196.77005.688 8.22568769E+01 1.29824936E+02
m73600.0790223.460016.111 1.06756877E+02 1.23964378E+02
risk2b16.65700.390042.710 -5.58761394E+01 -5.57361685E+01
risk2bpb17.29900.420041.188 -5.58761394E+01 -5.57361685E+01
st_e351.46400.0100--- 7.50131885E+04 1.17178934E+05
stockcycle3600.156098.010036.733 1.21476072E+05 1.43295165E+05
st_testgr30.32200.06005.367 -2.05456000E+01 -2.04688000E+01

Back to top



Back to top

Solver SBB much faster - Obj same for both solvers:

Modelname Time (LaGO) Time (SBB) Ratio (LaGO / SBB) Obj (LaGO) Obj (SBB)
batch0.50500.23002.196 2.85506508E+05 2.85506508E+05
fac10.67100.0100--- 1.60912612E+08 1.60912612E+08
fac30.66700.29002.300 3.19823098E+07 3.19823098E+07

Back to top



Back to top

Solver SBB infinitely faster - Obj of SBB better:

Modelname Time (LaGO) Time (SBB) Ratio (LaGO / SBB) Obj (LaGO) Obj (SBB)
st_miqp4fail 0.0000 -- 0.00000000E+00 -4.57400000E+03

Back to top



Back to top

Both solvers failed to solve optimally - Obj same for both solvers:

Modelname Time (LaGO) Time (SBB) Ratio (LaGO / SBB) Obj (LaGO) Obj (SBB)
fo7fail fail -- NA 0.00000000E+00
o7fail fail -- NA 0.00000000E+00
tls12fail fail -- NA 0.00000000E+00
tls6fail fail -- NA 0.00000000E+00
tls7fail fail -- NA 0.00000000E+00

Back to top