Data Inconsistency Check

Results created on 09/13/12 13:17:07 using the PAVER Server/Performance tools available at http://www.gamsworld.eu/performance/paver

BARON_baron:

du-opt5 solved to optimality (with value 8.07), but solver MYSCIP_scip reported a better objective value (8.07)
du-opt5 objective estimate 8.07 contradicts objective value 8.07 reported by solver MYSCIP_scip (minimization model)
ex4 solved to optimality (with value -8.06), but solver MYSCIP_scip reported a better objective value (-8.06)
ex4 objective estimate -8.06 contradicts objective value -8.06 reported by solver MYSCIP_scip (minimization model)
meanvarx solved to optimality (with value 14.37), but solver COUENNE_default reported a better objective value (14.37)
meanvarx objective estimate 14.37 contradicts objective value 14.37 reported by solver COUENNE_default (minimization model)
st_e31 solved to optimality (with value -2.00), but solver COUENNE_default reported a better objective value (-2.00)
st_e31 objective estimate -2.00 contradicts objective value -2.00 reported by solver COUENNE_default (minimization model)

COUENNE_default:

elf solved to optimality (with value 0.19), but solver BARON_baron reported a better objective value (0.19)
elf objective estimate 0.19 contradicts objective value 0.19 reported by solver BARON_baron (minimization model)
ex4 solved to optimality (with value -8.06), but solver MYSCIP_scip reported a better objective value (-8.06)
ex4 objective estimate -8.06 contradicts objective value -8.06 reported by solver MYSCIP_scip (minimization model)
parallel solved to optimality (with value 924.30), but solver BARON_baron reported a better objective value (924.24)
parallel objective estimate 924.30 contradicts objective value 924.24 reported by solver BARON_baron (minimization model)

LINDO_lindo:

du-opt5 solved to optimality (with value 8.07), but solver MYSCIP_scip reported a better objective value (8.07)
du-opt5 objective estimate 8.07 contradicts objective value 8.07 reported by solver MYSCIP_scip (minimization model)
elf solved to optimality (with value 0.19), but solver BARON_baron reported a better objective value (0.19)
elf objective estimate 0.19 contradicts objective value 0.19 reported by solver BARON_baron (minimization model)
ex4 solved to optimality (with value -8.06), but solver MYSCIP_scip reported a better objective value (-8.06)
ex4 objective estimate -8.06 contradicts objective value -8.06 reported by solver MYSCIP_scip (minimization model)
meanvarx solved to optimality (with value 14.37), but solver COUENNE_default reported a better objective value (14.37)
meanvarx objective estimate 14.37 contradicts objective value 14.37 reported by solver COUENNE_default (minimization model)
parallel solved to optimality (with value 924.30), but solver BARON_baron reported a better objective value (924.24)
parallel objective estimate 924.30 contradicts objective value 924.24 reported by solver BARON_baron (minimization model)
st_e31 solved to optimality (with value -2.00), but solver COUENNE_default reported a better objective value (-2.00)
st_e31 objective estimate -2.00 contradicts objective value -2.00 reported by solver COUENNE_default (minimization model)

MYSCIP_scip:

elf solved to optimality (with value 0.19), but solver BARON_baron reported a better objective value (0.19)
elf objective estimate 0.19 contradicts objective value 0.19 reported by solver BARON_baron (minimization model)
meanvarx solved to optimality (with value 14.37), but solver COUENNE_default reported a better objective value (14.37)
meanvarx objective estimate 14.37 contradicts objective value 14.37 reported by solver COUENNE_default (minimization model)
st_e31 solved to optimality (with value -2.00), but solver COUENNE_default reported a better objective value (-2.00)
st_e31 objective estimate -2.00 contradicts objective value -2.00 reported by solver COUENNE_default (minimization model)