--- Job m7 Start 09/06/08 10:38:22 GAMS Rev 228 Copyright (C) 1987-2008 GAMS Development. All rights reserved *** License File has expired 5 days ago Licensee: Stefan Vigerske G071106/0001CB-LNX Humboldt University Berlin, Numerical Mathematics DC5918 --- Starting compilation --- m7.gms(508) 2 Mb --- Starting execution: elapsed 0:00:00.006 --- m7.gms(503) 3 Mb --- Generating MINLP model m --- m7.gms(508) 5 Mb --- 212 rows 115 columns 867 non-zeroes --- 99 nl-code 14 nl-non-zeroes --- 42 discrete-columns --- m7.gms(508) 3 Mb --- Executing BONMIN: elapsed 0:00:00.012 GAMS/Bonmin MINLP Solver (Bonmin Library 0.99) written by P. Bonami List of user-set options: Name Value used bonmin.algorithm = B-Hyb yes ****************************************************************************** This program contains Ipopt, a library for large-scale nonlinear optimization. Ipopt is released as open source code under the Common Public License (CPL). For more information visit http://projects.coin-or.org/Ipopt ****************************************************************************** NLP0012I Num Status Obj It time NLP0013I 1 OPT 2.100154535964159e-10 23 0.052003 Cbc0031I 26 added rows had average density of 55.0385 Cbc0013I At root node, 26 cuts changed objective from 0 to 0 in 10 passes Cbc0014I Cut generator 0 (NLP solution based oa cuts) - 0 row cuts, 0 column cuts (0 active) Cbc0014I Cut generator 1 (Mixed Integer Gomory) - 253 row cuts, 0 column cuts (26 active) Cbc0014I Cut generator 2 (Probing) - 0 row cuts, 0 column cuts (0 active) Cbc0014I Cut generator 3 (Mixed Integer Rounding) - 0 row cuts, 0 column cuts (0 active) Cbc0014I Cut generator 4 (Cover) - 0 row cuts, 0 column cuts (0 active) Cbc0014I Cut generator 5 (Clique) - 0 row cuts, 0 column cuts (0 active) Cbc0014I Cut generator 6 (Flow Covers) - 0 row cuts, 0 column cuts (0 active) Cbc0014I Cut generator 7 (Outer Approximation decomposition.) - 0 row cuts, 0 column cuts (0 active) Cbc0014I Cut generator 8 (Outer Approximation feasibility check.) - 0 row cuts, 0 column cuts (0 active) Cbc0010I After 0 nodes, 1 on tree, 1e+50 best solution, best possible 0 (0.49 seconds) NLP0013I 2 OPT 71.50465697293093 22 0.060004 NLP0013I 3 OPT 37.34843845713598 16 0.032002 NLP0013I 4 OPT 62.3360707197142 14 0.028001 NLP0013I 5 OPT 94.61992807365077 23 0.056003 NLP0013I 6 OPT 22.34843845706808 22 0.048003 NLP0013I 7 OPT 96.65208809226857 23 0.064004 NLP0013I 8 OPT 115.4968769140139 17 0.036002 NLP0013I 9 OPT 24.00000000148967 12 0.024001 NLP0013I 10 OPT 91.34843845721625 24 0.064004 Cbc0010I After 100 nodes, 48 on tree, 1e+50 best solution, best possible 21.9771 (4.04 seconds) NLP0013I 11 OPT 70.80000000054497 20 0.052003 NLP0013I 12 OPT 94.61992830744728 26 0.056004 Cbc0010I After 200 nodes, 67 on tree, 1e+50 best solution, best possible 24 (4.70 seconds) Cbc0010I After 300 nodes, 67 on tree, 1e+50 best solution, best possible 24 (5.02 seconds) Cbc0010I After 400 nodes, 71 on tree, 1e+50 best solution, best possible 24 (5.31 seconds) Cbc0010I After 500 nodes, 73 on tree, 1e+50 best solution, best possible 24 (5.60 seconds) Cbc0010I After 600 nodes, 69 on tree, 1e+50 best solution, best possible 24 (5.88 seconds) Cbc0010I After 700 nodes, 71 on tree, 1e+50 best solution, best possible 24 (6.15 seconds) Cbc0010I After 800 nodes, 70 on tree, 1e+50 best solution, best possible 24 (6.43 seconds) Cbc0010I After 900 nodes, 70 on tree, 1e+50 best solution, best possible 24 (6.73 seconds) Cbc0010I After 1000 nodes, 66 on tree, 1e+50 best solution, best possible 24 (7.03 seconds) Cbc0010I After 1100 nodes, 69 on tree, 1e+50 best solution, best possible 24 (7.41 seconds) Cbc0010I After 1200 nodes, 78 on tree, 1e+50 best solution, best possible 24 (7.69 seconds) Cbc0010I After 1300 nodes, 77 on tree, 1e+50 best solution, best possible 24 (7.96 seconds) Cbc0010I After 1400 nodes, 69 on tree, 1e+50 best solution, best possible 24 (8.24 seconds) Cbc0010I After 1500 nodes, 70 on tree, 1e+50 best solution, best possible 24 (8.51 seconds) Cbc0010I After 1600 nodes, 76 on tree, 1e+50 best solution, best possible 24 (8.79 seconds) Cbc0010I After 1700 nodes, 75 on tree, 1e+50 best solution, best possible 24 (9.08 seconds) Cbc0010I After 1800 nodes, 77 on tree, 1e+50 best solution, best possible 24 (9.35 seconds) Cbc0010I After 1900 nodes, 76 on tree, 1e+50 best solution, best possible 24 (9.65 seconds) Cbc0010I After 2000 nodes, 70 on tree, 1e+50 best solution, best possible 24 (9.93 seconds) Cbc0010I After 2100 nodes, 71 on tree, 1e+50 best solution, best possible 24 (10.20 seconds) Cbc0010I After 2200 nodes, 71 on tree, 1e+50 best solution, best possible 24 (10.48 seconds) Cbc0010I After 2300 nodes, 70 on tree, 1e+50 best solution, best possible 24 (10.77 seconds) Cbc0010I After 2400 nodes, 73 on tree, 1e+50 best solution, best possible 24 (11.02 seconds) Cbc0010I After 2500 nodes, 68 on tree, 1e+50 best solution, best possible 24 (11.27 seconds) Cbc0010I After 2600 nodes, 68 on tree, 1e+50 best solution, best possible 24 (11.58 seconds) Cbc0010I After 2700 nodes, 67 on tree, 1e+50 best solution, best possible 24 (11.84 seconds) Cbc0010I After 2800 nodes, 65 on tree, 1e+50 best solution, best possible 24 (12.14 seconds) Cbc0010I After 2900 nodes, 72 on tree, 1e+50 best solution, best possible 24 (12.40 seconds) Cbc0010I After 3000 nodes, 74 on tree, 1e+50 best solution, best possible 24 (12.69 seconds) Cbc0010I After 3100 nodes, 70 on tree, 1e+50 best solution, best possible 24 (12.94 seconds) Cbc0010I After 3200 nodes, 72 on tree, 1e+50 best solution, best possible 24 (13.25 seconds) Cbc0010I After 3300 nodes, 70 on tree, 1e+50 best solution, best possible 24 (13.54 seconds) Cbc0010I After 3400 nodes, 65 on tree, 1e+50 best solution, best possible 24 (13.78 seconds) Cbc0010I After 3500 nodes, 72 on tree, 1e+50 best solution, best possible 24 (14.03 seconds) Cbc0010I After 3600 nodes, 75 on tree, 1e+50 best solution, best possible 24 (14.44 seconds) Cbc0010I After 3700 nodes, 70 on tree, 1e+50 best solution, best possible 24 (14.76 seconds) Cbc0010I After 3800 nodes, 72 on tree, 1e+50 best solution, best possible 24 (15.08 seconds) Cbc0010I After 3900 nodes, 67 on tree, 1e+50 best solution, best possible 24 (15.42 seconds) Cbc0010I After 4000 nodes, 67 on tree, 1e+50 best solution, best possible 24 (15.75 seconds) Cbc0010I After 4100 nodes, 69 on tree, 1e+50 best solution, best possible 24 (16.12 seconds) Cbc0010I After 4200 nodes, 68 on tree, 1e+50 best solution, best possible 24 (16.47 seconds) Cbc0010I After 4300 nodes, 75 on tree, 1e+50 best solution, best possible 24 (16.84 seconds) OA0003I New best feasible of 242.732 found after 17.0571 sec. Cbc0012I Integer solution of 242.732 found by noonlinear programm after 71402 iterations and 4355 nodes (17.05 seconds) Cbc0010I After 4400 nodes, 91 on tree, 242.732 best solution, best possible 24 (17.27 seconds) Cbc0010I After 4500 nodes, 102 on tree, 242.732 best solution, best possible 24 (17.74 seconds) Cbc0010I After 4600 nodes, 131 on tree, 242.732 best solution, best possible 24 (18.37 seconds) Cbc0010I After 4700 nodes, 154 on tree, 242.732 best solution, best possible 24 (18.84 seconds) Cbc0010I After 4800 nodes, 180 on tree, 242.732 best solution, best possible 24 (19.29 seconds) Cbc0010I After 4900 nodes, 208 on tree, 242.732 best solution, best possible 24 (19.91 seconds) Cbc0010I After 5000 nodes, 234 on tree, 242.732 best solution, best possible 24 (20.41 seconds) Cbc0010I After 5100 nodes, 247 on tree, 242.732 best solution, best possible 24 (20.79 seconds) Cbc0010I After 5200 nodes, 271 on tree, 242.732 best solution, best possible 24 (21.29 seconds) Cbc0010I After 5300 nodes, 297 on tree, 242.732 best solution, best possible 24 (21.92 seconds) Cbc0010I After 5400 nodes, 317 on tree, 242.732 best solution, best possible 24 (22.39 seconds) OA0003I New best feasible of 126.337 found after 22.6334 sec. Cbc0012I Integer solution of 126.337 found by noonlinear programm after 93531 iterations and 5459 nodes (22.65 seconds) Cbc0010I After 5500 nodes, 178 on tree, 126.337 best solution, best possible 24 (23.04 seconds) Cbc0010I After 5600 nodes, 207 on tree, 126.337 best solution, best possible 24 (23.78 seconds) Cbc0010I After 5700 nodes, 237 on tree, 126.337 best solution, best possible 24 (24.72 seconds) Cbc0010I After 5800 nodes, 266 on tree, 126.337 best solution, best possible 24 (25.53 seconds) Cbc0010I After 5900 nodes, 291 on tree, 126.337 best solution, best possible 24 (26.37 seconds) Cbc0010I After 6000 nodes, 330 on tree, 126.337 best solution, best possible 24 (27.15 seconds) OA0003I New best feasible of 106.757 found after 27.3177 sec. Cbc0012I Integer solution of 106.757 found by noonlinear programm after 109621 iterations and 6022 nodes (27.31 seconds) Cbc0010I After 6100 nodes, 299 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 27.247 (27.98 seconds) Cbc0010I After 6200 nodes, 320 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 37.3484 (28.51 seconds) Cbc0010I After 6300 nodes, 356 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 38.2839 (29.43 seconds) Cbc0010I After 6400 nodes, 373 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 38.2839 (29.96 seconds) Cbc0010I After 6500 nodes, 397 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 38.2839 (30.66 seconds) Cbc0010I After 6600 nodes, 412 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 38.2839 (31.24 seconds) Cbc0010I After 6700 nodes, 435 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 38.2839 (32.07 seconds) Cbc0010I After 6800 nodes, 448 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 38.2839 (32.59 seconds) Cbc0010I After 6900 nodes, 486 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 38.2839 (33.22 seconds) Cbc0010I After 7000 nodes, 504 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 38.2839 (33.76 seconds) Cbc0010I After 7100 nodes, 521 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 40.8 (34.48 seconds) Cbc0010I After 7200 nodes, 523 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 40.8 (35.05 seconds) Cbc0010I After 7300 nodes, 545 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 40.8 (35.66 seconds) Cbc0010I After 7400 nodes, 558 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 40.8 (36.23 seconds) Cbc0010I After 7500 nodes, 576 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 40.8 (36.93 seconds) Cbc0010I After 7600 nodes, 591 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 54.3618 (37.54 seconds) Cbc0010I After 7700 nodes, 603 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 54.3618 (38.03 seconds) Cbc0010I After 7800 nodes, 612 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 54.3618 (38.54 seconds) Cbc0010I After 7900 nodes, 619 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 54.3618 (39.03 seconds) Cbc0010I After 8000 nodes, 632 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 54.3618 (39.60 seconds) Cbc0010I After 8100 nodes, 648 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 54.3618 (40.18 seconds) Cbc0010I After 8200 nodes, 657 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 54.3618 (40.70 seconds) Cbc0010I After 8300 nodes, 662 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 54.3618 (41.11 seconds) Cbc0010I After 8400 nodes, 659 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 54.3618 (41.63 seconds) Cbc0010I After 8500 nodes, 667 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 54.3618 (42.18 seconds) Cbc0010I After 8600 nodes, 668 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 54.6741 (42.72 seconds) Cbc0010I After 8700 nodes, 670 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 54.9861 (43.17 seconds) Cbc0010I After 8800 nodes, 672 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 56.7986 (43.63 seconds) Cbc0010I After 8900 nodes, 671 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 56.7986 (44.05 seconds) Cbc0010I After 9000 nodes, 673 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 56.7986 (44.49 seconds) Cbc0010I After 9100 nodes, 672 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 56.7986 (44.92 seconds) Cbc0010I After 9200 nodes, 675 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 56.7986 (45.27 seconds) Cbc0010I After 9300 nodes, 678 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 56.7986 (45.85 seconds) Cbc0010I After 9400 nodes, 686 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 56.7986 (46.34 seconds) Cbc0010I After 9500 nodes, 683 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 56.7986 (46.64 seconds) Cbc0010I After 9600 nodes, 692 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 56.7986 (47.06 seconds) Cbc0010I After 9700 nodes, 693 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 56.7986 (47.42 seconds) Cbc0010I After 9800 nodes, 692 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 56.7986 (47.75 seconds) Cbc0010I After 9900 nodes, 691 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 56.7986 (48.33 seconds) Cbc0010I After 10000 nodes, 686 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 56.7986 (48.74 seconds) Cbc0010I After 10100 nodes, 681 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 56.7986 (49.22 seconds) Cbc0010I After 10200 nodes, 692 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 56.7986 (49.91 seconds) Cbc0010I After 10300 nodes, 697 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 56.7986 (50.32 seconds) Cbc0010I After 10400 nodes, 694 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 56.7986 (50.83 seconds) Cbc0010I After 10500 nodes, 687 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 56.7986 (51.20 seconds) Cbc0010I After 10600 nodes, 685 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 62.3361 (51.74 seconds) Cbc0010I After 10700 nodes, 679 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 62.3361 (52.19 seconds) Cbc0010I After 10800 nodes, 679 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 62.3361 (52.60 seconds) Cbc0010I After 10900 nodes, 684 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 62.3361 (53.11 seconds) Cbc0010I After 11000 nodes, 682 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 62.3361 (53.48 seconds) Cbc0010I After 11100 nodes, 720 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 71.5047 (54.58 seconds) Cbc0010I After 11200 nodes, 733 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 78.2376 (55.21 seconds) Cbc0010I After 11300 nodes, 750 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 79.477 (55.88 seconds) Cbc0010I After 11400 nodes, 766 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 80.2839 (56.51 seconds) Cbc0010I After 11500 nodes, 769 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 80.6641 (57.06 seconds) Cbc0010I After 11600 nodes, 786 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 81.4475 (57.67 seconds) Cbc0010I After 11700 nodes, 789 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 82.0115 (58.42 seconds) Cbc0010I After 11800 nodes, 788 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 83.6782 (58.94 seconds) Cbc0010I After 11900 nodes, 786 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 84.4549 (59.53 seconds) Cbc0010I After 12000 nodes, 789 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 86.4334 (60.33 seconds) Cbc0010I After 12100 nodes, 784 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 88.2033 (61.12 seconds) Cbc0010I After 12200 nodes, 787 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 89.6931 (61.81 seconds) Cbc0010I After 12300 nodes, 790 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 90.4157 (62.50 seconds) Cbc0010I After 12400 nodes, 813 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 90.7808 (63.12 seconds) Cbc0010I After 12500 nodes, 838 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 90.7808 (63.67 seconds) Cbc0010I After 12600 nodes, 845 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 91.2318 (64.20 seconds) Cbc0010I After 12700 nodes, 840 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 91.8339 (64.86 seconds) Cbc0010I After 12800 nodes, 832 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 92.134 (65.32 seconds) Cbc0010I After 12900 nodes, 845 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 92.5273 (65.92 seconds) Cbc0010I After 13000 nodes, 886 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 92.5273 (66.72 seconds) Cbc0010I After 13100 nodes, 885 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 92.5273 (67.05 seconds) Cbc0010I After 13200 nodes, 880 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 92.5273 (67.41 seconds) Cbc0010I After 13300 nodes, 877 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 92.5273 (67.76 seconds) Cbc0010I After 13400 nodes, 876 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 92.5273 (68.13 seconds) Cbc0010I After 13500 nodes, 873 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 92.5273 (68.50 seconds) Cbc0010I After 13600 nodes, 861 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 92.5273 (68.84 seconds) Cbc0010I After 13700 nodes, 868 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 92.5273 (69.24 seconds) Cbc0010I After 13800 nodes, 865 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 92.5273 (69.63 seconds) Cbc0010I After 13900 nodes, 873 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 92.5273 (70.08 seconds) Cbc0010I After 14000 nodes, 872 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 92.5273 (70.49 seconds) Cbc0010I After 14100 nodes, 899 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 92.5273 (71.02 seconds) Cbc0010I After 14200 nodes, 917 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 92.5273 (71.60 seconds) Cbc0010I After 14300 nodes, 927 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 92.8188 (72.12 seconds) Cbc0010I After 14400 nodes, 943 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 92.875 (72.57 seconds) Cbc0010I After 14500 nodes, 930 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 93.5261 (73.01 seconds) Cbc0010I After 14600 nodes, 947 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 93.5308 (73.54 seconds) Cbc0010I After 14700 nodes, 971 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 93.5324 (74.09 seconds) Cbc0010I After 14800 nodes, 982 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 93.5324 (74.59 seconds) Cbc0010I After 14900 nodes, 979 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 93.5324 (75.04 seconds) Cbc0010I After 15000 nodes, 987 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 93.5509 (75.54 seconds) Cbc0010I After 15100 nodes, 1012 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 93.5724 (76.10 seconds) Cbc0010I After 15200 nodes, 1012 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 93.8381 (76.64 seconds) Cbc0010I After 15300 nodes, 1031 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 93.8722 (77.22 seconds) Cbc0010I After 15400 nodes, 1061 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 93.8831 (77.78 seconds) Cbc0010I After 15500 nodes, 1071 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 93.8831 (78.28 seconds) Cbc0010I After 15600 nodes, 1087 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 93.8871 (78.80 seconds) Cbc0010I After 15700 nodes, 1106 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 93.8871 (79.40 seconds) Cbc0010I After 15800 nodes, 1114 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 93.9911 (79.88 seconds) Cbc0010I After 15900 nodes, 1125 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 94.2408 (80.40 seconds) Cbc0010I After 16000 nodes, 1119 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 94.6199 (80.99 seconds) Cbc0010I After 16100 nodes, 1116 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 94.6199 (81.85 seconds) Cbc0010I After 16200 nodes, 1112 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 94.8282 (82.38 seconds) Cbc0010I After 16300 nodes, 1098 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 95.296 (82.77 seconds) Cbc0010I After 16400 nodes, 1091 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 95.6135 (83.21 seconds) Cbc0010I After 16500 nodes, 1089 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 95.9464 (83.68 seconds) Cbc0010I After 16600 nodes, 1102 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 96.1899 (84.15 seconds) Cbc0010I After 16700 nodes, 1088 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 96.5257 (84.62 seconds) Cbc0010I After 16800 nodes, 1090 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 96.6697 (85.12 seconds) Cbc0010I After 16900 nodes, 1090 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 96.9198 (85.51 seconds) Cbc0010I After 17000 nodes, 1083 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 97.2599 (85.95 seconds) Cbc0010I After 17100 nodes, 1072 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 97.2599 (86.24 seconds) Cbc0010I After 17200 nodes, 1067 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 97.2599 (86.57 seconds) Cbc0010I After 17300 nodes, 1054 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 97.2599 (86.88 seconds) Cbc0010I After 17400 nodes, 1052 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 97.2599 (87.21 seconds) Cbc0010I After 17500 nodes, 1045 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 97.2599 (87.55 seconds) Cbc0010I After 17600 nodes, 1043 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 97.2599 (87.93 seconds) Cbc0010I After 17700 nodes, 1043 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 97.2599 (88.30 seconds) Cbc0010I After 17800 nodes, 1041 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 97.2599 (88.65 seconds) Cbc0010I After 17900 nodes, 1033 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 97.2634 (88.97 seconds) Cbc0010I After 18000 nodes, 1014 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 97.2634 (89.32 seconds) Cbc0010I After 18100 nodes, 1009 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 97.6069 (89.74 seconds) Cbc0010I After 18200 nodes, 1018 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 97.6482 (90.16 seconds) Cbc0010I After 18300 nodes, 1011 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 98.0254 (90.65 seconds) Cbc0010I After 18400 nodes, 1006 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 98.1893 (91.09 seconds) Cbc0010I After 18500 nodes, 1004 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 98.4417 (91.80 seconds) Cbc0010I After 18600 nodes, 990 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 98.6095 (92.25 seconds) Cbc0010I After 18700 nodes, 971 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 98.8654 (92.57 seconds) Cbc0010I After 18800 nodes, 951 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 99.1645 (93.00 seconds) Cbc0010I After 18900 nodes, 954 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 99.3868 (93.49 seconds) Cbc0010I After 19000 nodes, 944 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 99.7592 (93.87 seconds) Cbc0010I After 19100 nodes, 940 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 99.9999 (94.26 seconds) Cbc0010I After 19200 nodes, 946 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 100.051 (94.70 seconds) Cbc0010I After 19300 nodes, 949 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 100.057 (95.09 seconds) Cbc0010I After 19400 nodes, 954 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 100.065 (95.53 seconds) Cbc0010I After 19500 nodes, 966 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 100.065 (96.00 seconds) Cbc0010I After 19600 nodes, 982 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 100.069 (96.49 seconds) Cbc0010I After 19700 nodes, 1005 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 100.072 (97.01 seconds) Cbc0010I After 19800 nodes, 1013 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 100.083 (97.44 seconds) Cbc0010I After 19900 nodes, 1011 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 100.083 (97.81 seconds) Cbc0010I After 20000 nodes, 1022 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 100.083 (98.25 seconds) Cbc0010I After 20100 nodes, 1017 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 100.083 (98.63 seconds) Cbc0010I After 20200 nodes, 1023 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 100.083 (99.04 seconds) Cbc0010I After 20300 nodes, 1028 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 100.083 (99.45 seconds) Cbc0010I After 20400 nodes, 1046 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 100.083 (99.87 seconds) Cbc0010I After 20500 nodes, 1037 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 100.083 (100.24 seconds) Cbc0010I After 20600 nodes, 1032 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 100.191 (100.59 seconds) Cbc0010I After 20700 nodes, 1019 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 100.404 (100.94 seconds) Cbc0010I After 20800 nodes, 1032 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 100.43 (101.32 seconds) Cbc0010I After 20900 nodes, 1028 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 100.431 (101.65 seconds) Cbc0010I After 21000 nodes, 1028 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 100.431 (102.02 seconds) Cbc0010I After 21100 nodes, 1006 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 100.431 (102.26 seconds) Cbc0010I After 21200 nodes, 990 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 100.431 (102.53 seconds) Cbc0010I After 21300 nodes, 974 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 100.431 (102.80 seconds) Cbc0010I After 21400 nodes, 960 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 100.431 (103.09 seconds) Cbc0010I After 21500 nodes, 942 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 100.431 (103.40 seconds) Cbc0010I After 21600 nodes, 923 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 100.431 (103.67 seconds) Cbc0010I After 21700 nodes, 915 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 100.431 (103.97 seconds) Cbc0010I After 21800 nodes, 904 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 100.431 (104.26 seconds) Cbc0010I After 21900 nodes, 891 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 100.431 (104.57 seconds) Cbc0010I After 22000 nodes, 887 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 100.431 (104.91 seconds) Cbc0010I After 22100 nodes, 870 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 100.8 (105.28 seconds) Cbc0010I After 22200 nodes, 863 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 100.948 (105.68 seconds) Cbc0010I After 22300 nodes, 872 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 100.997 (106.15 seconds) Cbc0010I After 22400 nodes, 890 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 100.997 (106.65 seconds) Cbc0010I After 22500 nodes, 891 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 101.125 (107.11 seconds) Cbc0010I After 22600 nodes, 895 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 101.198 (107.51 seconds) Cbc0010I After 22700 nodes, 889 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 101.198 (107.88 seconds) Cbc0010I After 22800 nodes, 879 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 101.198 (108.25 seconds) Cbc0010I After 22900 nodes, 861 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 101.299 (108.57 seconds) Cbc0010I After 23000 nodes, 850 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 101.444 (108.94 seconds) Cbc0010I After 23100 nodes, 848 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 101.541 (109.41 seconds) Cbc0010I After 23200 nodes, 833 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 101.631 (109.78 seconds) Cbc0010I After 23300 nodes, 814 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 101.655 (110.09 seconds) Cbc0010I After 23400 nodes, 808 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 101.75 (110.43 seconds) Cbc0010I After 23500 nodes, 787 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 101.887 (110.74 seconds) Cbc0010I After 23600 nodes, 783 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 101.963 (111.10 seconds) Cbc0010I After 23700 nodes, 765 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 102.071 (111.47 seconds) Cbc0010I After 23800 nodes, 757 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 102.129 (111.88 seconds) Cbc0010I After 23900 nodes, 758 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 102.154 (112.34 seconds) Cbc0010I After 24000 nodes, 756 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 102.311 (112.73 seconds) Cbc0010I After 24100 nodes, 737 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 102.466 (113.05 seconds) Cbc0010I After 24200 nodes, 727 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 102.573 (113.43 seconds) Cbc0010I After 24300 nodes, 712 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 102.685 (113.87 seconds) Cbc0010I After 24400 nodes, 709 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 102.743 (114.32 seconds) Cbc0010I After 24500 nodes, 712 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 102.797 (114.90 seconds) Cbc0010I After 24600 nodes, 707 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 102.904 (115.26 seconds) Cbc0010I After 24700 nodes, 695 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 102.988 (115.57 seconds) Cbc0010I After 24800 nodes, 668 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 103.133 (115.91 seconds) Cbc0010I After 24900 nodes, 653 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 103.357 (116.35 seconds) Cbc0010I After 25000 nodes, 640 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 103.464 (116.68 seconds) Cbc0010I After 25100 nodes, 617 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 103.464 (116.96 seconds) Cbc0010I After 25200 nodes, 597 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 103.464 (117.26 seconds) Cbc0010I After 25300 nodes, 572 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 103.464 (117.56 seconds) Cbc0010I After 25400 nodes, 561 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 103.464 (117.86 seconds) Cbc0010I After 25500 nodes, 534 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 103.469 (118.17 seconds) Cbc0010I After 25600 nodes, 516 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 103.469 (118.48 seconds) Cbc0010I After 25700 nodes, 499 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 103.469 (118.81 seconds) Cbc0010I After 25800 nodes, 485 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 103.469 (119.12 seconds) Cbc0010I After 25900 nodes, 467 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 103.469 (119.44 seconds) Cbc0010I After 26000 nodes, 446 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 103.469 (119.76 seconds) Cbc0010I After 26100 nodes, 433 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 103.747 (120.14 seconds) Cbc0010I After 26200 nodes, 420 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 103.861 (120.62 seconds) Cbc0010I After 26300 nodes, 404 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 104.102 (120.97 seconds) Cbc0010I After 26400 nodes, 398 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 104.225 (121.33 seconds) Cbc0010I After 26500 nodes, 393 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 104.343 (121.71 seconds) Cbc0010I After 26600 nodes, 383 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 104.395 (122.14 seconds) Cbc0010I After 26700 nodes, 358 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 104.474 (122.49 seconds) Cbc0010I After 26800 nodes, 341 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 104.833 (122.91 seconds) Cbc0010I After 26900 nodes, 321 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 104.988 (123.25 seconds) Cbc0010I After 27000 nodes, 297 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 105.122 (123.53 seconds) Cbc0010I After 27100 nodes, 274 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 105.231 (123.98 seconds) Cbc0010I After 27200 nodes, 259 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 105.442 (124.30 seconds) Cbc0010I After 27300 nodes, 228 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 105.709 (124.66 seconds) Cbc0011I Exiting as integer gap of 1.04788 less than 0 or 1% Cbc0001I Search completed - best objective 106.756876914396, took 535601 iterations and 27301 nodes (124.66 seconds) Cbc0032I Strong branching done 642 times (14617 iterations), fathomed 0 nodes and fixed 0 variables Cbc0035I Maximum depth 36, 0 variables fixed on reduced cost NLP solution based oa cuts was tried 1528 times and created 1932 cuts of which 88 were active after adding rounds of cuts Mixed Integer Gomory was tried 3487 times and created 34590 cuts of which 9409 were active after adding rounds of cuts Outer Approximation feasibility check. was tried 3 times and created 50 cuts of which 0 were active after adding rounds of cuts Bonmin finished. Found feasible point. Objective function = 106.756877. Resolve with fixed discrete variables to get dual values. MINLP solution: 106.7568769 (27301 nodes, 124.71 seconds) Best possible: 106.7568769 Absolute gap: 1.5632e-13 Relative gap: 1.4643e-15 GAMS/Bonmin finished. --- Restarting execution --- m7.gms(508) 0 Mb --- Reading solution for model m *** Status: Normal completion --- Job m7.gms Stop 09/06/08 10:40:28 elapsed 0:02:06.598