Resource Times:

Date / Time: 09/29/08 16:21:55


See the solver return definitions for optimal/feasible model and solve statuses. Solutions are not checked for how close they are to eachother. Resource times are considered the same, if they are within 10% of eachother. A solver is considered faster than another, if it is less than 50% faster than the other. A solver is considered much faster than another, if it is more than 50% faster than the other.

If a model was not solved optimal/feasible by both solvers, the resource time is considered the same. If a model was solved optimal/feasible by solver A but not by solver B, then solver A is considered infinitely faster than solver B. Similarly, if one solver has trace data and the other has no data, then the first solver is consideredinfinitely faster.

A solver is considered to have a better objective function value, if the relative objective value difference is greater than 1.00E-05 For objective values below 1e-1 we use absolute differences.

Tracefile 1 :BONMIN-3.trc.convex
Tracefile 2 :BONMIN-5.trc.convex
Solvers used : BONMINBB3
BONMINHyb
Modeltype(s)   MINLP
Threshold: Solver Faster 10%
Threshold: Solver Much Faster 50%
Threshold: Solver Infinitely Faster Other solver failed


Total Obj BONMINBB3 better Obj same Obj BONMINHyb better
Solver BONMINBB3 infinitely faster : 1 1 - -
Solver BONMINBB3 much faster :- - - -
Solver BONMINBB3 faster :- - - -
Solvers perform the same : 4 1 3 -
Solver BONMINHyb faster : 12 1 11 -
Solver BONMINHyb much faster : 14 1 11 2
Solver BONMINHyb infinitely faster : 5 - - 5
Both solvers failed to solve optimally : 2 - 2 -
Total models: : 384277




Solver return definition:

OutcomeModel StatusSolver Status
globally optimal 1 or 15 1
locally optimal/feasible 2 or 8 or 16 1 or 2 or 3 or 4 or 5




Resource Times:

Back to top

Solver BONMINBB3 infinitely faster - Obj of BONMINBB3 better:

Modelname Time (BONMINBB3) Time (BONMINHyb) Ratio (BONMINBB3 / BONMINHyb) Obj (BONMINBB3) Obj (BONMINHyb)
stockcycle158.8300fail -- 1.19948688E+05 NA

Back to top



Back to top

Solvers perform the same - Obj of BONMINBB3 better:

Modelname Time (BONMINBB3) Time (BONMINHyb) Ratio (BONMINBB3 / BONMINHyb) Obj (BONMINBB3) Obj (BONMINHyb)
du-opt7.18007.08001.014 3.57591364E+00 3.57912580E+00

Back to top



Back to top

Solvers perform the same - Obj same for both solvers:

Modelname Time (BONMINBB3) Time (BONMINHyb) Ratio (BONMINBB3 / BONMINHyb) Obj (BONMINBB3) Obj (BONMINHyb)
alan0.28000.27001.037 2.92500000E+00 2.92500000E+00
nvs100.10000.0200--- -3.10800000E+02 -3.10800000E+02
st_miqp30.04000.0000--- -6.00000000E+00 -6.00000000E+00

Back to top



Back to top

Solver BONMINHyb faster - Obj of BONMINBB3 better:

Modelname Time (BONMINBB3) Time (BONMINHyb) Ratio (BONMINBB3 / BONMINHyb) Obj (BONMINBB3) Obj (BONMINHyb)
st_test80.25000.0100--- -2.96050000E+04 -2.95750000E+04

Back to top



Back to top

Solver BONMINHyb faster - Obj same for both solvers:

Modelname Time (BONMINBB3) Time (BONMINHyb) Ratio (BONMINBB3 / BONMINHyb) Obj (BONMINBB3) Obj (BONMINHyb)
du-opt57.35004.17001.763 8.07365758E+00 8.07365758E+00
ex1223a0.13000.0200--- 4.57958240E+00 4.57958240E+00
gbd0.15000.0100--- 2.20000000E+00 2.20000000E+00
nvs030.24000.0000--- 1.60000000E+01 1.60000000E+01
st_e140.33000.18001.833 4.57958240E+00 4.57958249E+00
st_miqp10.18000.0000--- 2.81000000E+02 2.81000000E+02
st_miqp40.27000.0400--- -4.57400000E+03 -4.57400000E+03
st_miqp50.12000.07001.714 -3.33888889E+02 -3.33888889E+02
st_testph40.15000.0000--- -8.05000000E+01 -8.05000000E+01
synthes10.31000.16001.938 6.00975891E+00 6.00975891E+00
synthes30.91000.59001.542 6.80097405E+01 6.80097405E+01

Back to top



Back to top

Solver BONMINHyb much faster - Obj of BONMINBB3 better:

Modelname Time (BONMINBB3) Time (BONMINHyb) Ratio (BONMINBB3 / BONMINHyb) Obj (BONMINBB3) Obj (BONMINHyb)
st_testgr33.87000.050077.400 -2.05055000E+01 -2.04775000E+01

Back to top



Back to top

Solver BONMINHyb much faster - Obj same for both solvers:

Modelname Time (BONMINBB3) Time (BONMINHyb) Ratio (BONMINBB3 / BONMINHyb) Obj (BONMINBB3) Obj (BONMINHyb)
batch6.85002.31002.965 2.85506508E+05 2.85506508E+05
ex12230.33000.12002.750 4.57958240E+00 4.57958249E+00
ex1223b0.32000.08004.000 4.57958240E+00 4.57958240E+00
fac10.70000.12005.833 1.60912612E+08 1.60912612E+08
fac34.75000.51009.314 3.19823098E+07 3.19823098E+07
m311.17000.140079.786 3.78000000E+01 3.78000000E+01
meanvarx0.68000.31002.194 1.43692321E+01 1.43692321E+01
risk2bpb20.55002.58007.965 -5.58761394E+01 -5.58761394E+01
st_test52.22000.0100--- -1.10000000E+02 -1.10000000E+02
st_test63.53000.0100--- 4.71000000E+02 4.71000000E+02
synthes20.70000.15004.667 7.30353125E+01 7.30353125E+01

Back to top



Back to top

Solver BONMINHyb much faster - Obj of BONMINHyb better:

Modelname Time (BONMINBB3) Time (BONMINHyb) Ratio (BONMINBB3 / BONMINHyb) Obj (BONMINBB3) Obj (BONMINHyb)
m63600.300017.9600200.462 8.22855188E+01 8.22568769E+01
st_testgr10.56000.22002.545 -1.27859500E+01 -1.27929000E+01

Back to top



Back to top

Solver BONMINHyb infinitely faster - Obj of BONMINHyb better:

Modelname Time (BONMINBB3) Time (BONMINHyb) Ratio (BONMINBB3 / BONMINHyb) Obj (BONMINBB3) Obj (BONMINHyb)
fo7fail 1021.7900 -- NA 2.07298251E+01
m7fail 124.7100 -- NA 1.06756877E+02
o7fail 3605.5100 -- NA 1.31660328E+02
tls6fail 3605.1400 -- NA 1.53000000E+01
tls7fail 3606.7900 -- NA 1.74000000E+01

Back to top



Back to top

Both solvers failed to solve optimally - Obj same for both solvers:

Modelname Time (BONMINBB3) Time (BONMINHyb) Ratio (BONMINBB3 / BONMINHyb) Obj (BONMINBB3) Obj (BONMINHyb)
st_miqp2infeasible fail -- NA NA
tls12fail fail -- NA NA

Back to top