--- Job m7 Start 09/06/08 15:03:48 GAMS Rev 228 Copyright (C) 1987-2008 GAMS Development. All rights reserved *** License File has expired 5 days ago Licensee: Stefan Vigerske G071106/0001CB-LNX Humboldt University Berlin, Numerical Mathematics DC5918 --- Starting compilation --- m7.gms(508) 2 Mb --- Starting execution: elapsed 0:00:00.005 --- m7.gms(503) 3 Mb --- Generating MINLP model m --- m7.gms(508) 5 Mb --- 212 rows 115 columns 867 non-zeroes --- 99 nl-code 14 nl-non-zeroes --- 42 discrete-columns --- m7.gms(508) 3 Mb --- Executing BONMIN: elapsed 0:00:00.012 GAMS/Bonmin MINLP Solver (Bonmin Library 0.99) written by P. Bonami List of user-set options: Name Value used bonmin.algorithm = B-OA yes ****************************************************************************** This program contains Ipopt, a library for large-scale nonlinear optimization. Ipopt is released as open source code under the Common Public License (CPL). For more information visit http://projects.coin-or.org/Ipopt ****************************************************************************** NLP0012I Num Status Obj It time NLP0013I 1 OPT 2.100154535964159e-10 23 0.052003 Cbc0031I 26 added rows had average density of 55.0385 Cbc0013I At root node, 26 cuts changed objective from 0 to 0 in 10 passes Cbc0014I Cut generator 0 (Mixed Integer Gomory) - 253 row cuts, 0 column cuts (26 active) Cbc0014I Cut generator 1 (Probing) - 0 row cuts, 0 column cuts (0 active) Cbc0014I Cut generator 2 (Mixed Integer Rounding) - 0 row cuts, 0 column cuts (0 active) Cbc0014I Cut generator 3 (Cover) - 0 row cuts, 0 column cuts (0 active) Cbc0014I Cut generator 4 (Clique) - 0 row cuts, 0 column cuts (0 active) Cbc0014I Cut generator 5 (Flow Covers) - 0 row cuts, 0 column cuts (0 active) Cbc0014I Cut generator 6 (Outer Approximation decomposition.) - 0 row cuts, 0 column cuts (0 active) Cbc0014I Cut generator 7 (Outer Approximation feasibility check.) - 0 row cuts, 0 column cuts (0 active) Cbc0010I After 0 nodes, 1 on tree, 1e+50 best solution, best possible 0 (0.48 seconds) Cbc0010I After 100 nodes, 49 on tree, 1e+50 best solution, best possible 21.9771 (3.43 seconds) Cbc0010I After 200 nodes, 76 on tree, 1e+50 best solution, best possible 22.3482 (3.88 seconds) Cbc0010I After 300 nodes, 81 on tree, 1e+50 best solution, best possible 22.3482 (4.10 seconds) Cbc0010I After 400 nodes, 78 on tree, 1e+50 best solution, best possible 22.3482 (4.32 seconds) Cbc0010I After 500 nodes, 78 on tree, 1e+50 best solution, best possible 22.3482 (4.54 seconds) Cbc0010I After 600 nodes, 73 on tree, 1e+50 best solution, best possible 22.3482 (4.79 seconds) Cbc0010I After 700 nodes, 76 on tree, 1e+50 best solution, best possible 22.3482 (5.00 seconds) Cbc0010I After 800 nodes, 76 on tree, 1e+50 best solution, best possible 22.3482 (5.22 seconds) Cbc0010I After 900 nodes, 74 on tree, 1e+50 best solution, best possible 22.3482 (5.44 seconds) Cbc0010I After 1000 nodes, 78 on tree, 1e+50 best solution, best possible 22.3482 (5.68 seconds) Cbc0010I After 1100 nodes, 74 on tree, 1e+50 best solution, best possible 22.3482 (5.92 seconds) Cbc0010I After 1200 nodes, 72 on tree, 1e+50 best solution, best possible 22.3482 (6.15 seconds) Cbc0010I After 1300 nodes, 73 on tree, 1e+50 best solution, best possible 22.3482 (6.38 seconds) Cbc0010I After 1400 nodes, 71 on tree, 1e+50 best solution, best possible 22.3482 (6.61 seconds) Cbc0010I After 1500 nodes, 73 on tree, 1e+50 best solution, best possible 22.3482 (6.84 seconds) Cbc0010I After 1600 nodes, 77 on tree, 1e+50 best solution, best possible 22.3482 (7.19 seconds) Cbc0010I After 1700 nodes, 75 on tree, 1e+50 best solution, best possible 22.3482 (7.43 seconds) Cbc0010I After 1800 nodes, 74 on tree, 1e+50 best solution, best possible 22.3482 (7.68 seconds) Cbc0010I After 1900 nodes, 74 on tree, 1e+50 best solution, best possible 22.3482 (7.92 seconds) Cbc0010I After 2000 nodes, 74 on tree, 1e+50 best solution, best possible 22.3482 (8.16 seconds) Cbc0010I After 2100 nodes, 74 on tree, 1e+50 best solution, best possible 22.3482 (8.39 seconds) Cbc0010I After 2200 nodes, 70 on tree, 1e+50 best solution, best possible 22.3482 (8.64 seconds) Cbc0010I After 2300 nodes, 76 on tree, 1e+50 best solution, best possible 22.3482 (8.89 seconds) Cbc0010I After 2400 nodes, 77 on tree, 1e+50 best solution, best possible 22.3482 (9.15 seconds) Cbc0010I After 2500 nodes, 76 on tree, 1e+50 best solution, best possible 22.3482 (9.42 seconds) Cbc0010I After 2600 nodes, 75 on tree, 1e+50 best solution, best possible 22.3482 (9.72 seconds) Cbc0010I After 2700 nodes, 77 on tree, 1e+50 best solution, best possible 22.3482 (9.99 seconds) Cbc0010I After 2800 nodes, 75 on tree, 1e+50 best solution, best possible 22.3482 (10.26 seconds) Cbc0010I After 2900 nodes, 77 on tree, 1e+50 best solution, best possible 22.3482 (10.53 seconds) Cbc0010I After 3000 nodes, 74 on tree, 1e+50 best solution, best possible 22.3482 (10.79 seconds) Cbc0010I After 3100 nodes, 75 on tree, 1e+50 best solution, best possible 22.3482 (11.03 seconds) OA0003I New best feasible of 322.129 found after 11.3607 sec. Cbc0012I Integer solution of 322.129 found by noonlinear programm after 50698 iterations and 3197 nodes (11.36 seconds) Cbc0010I After 3200 nodes, 77 on tree, 322.129 best solution, best possible 22.3482 (11.40 seconds) Cbc0010I After 3300 nodes, 106 on tree, 322.129 best solution, best possible 22.3482 (11.79 seconds) Cbc0010I After 3400 nodes, 115 on tree, 322.129 best solution, best possible 22.3482 (12.10 seconds) Cbc0010I After 3500 nodes, 112 on tree, 322.129 best solution, best possible 22.3482 (12.39 seconds) Cbc0010I After 3600 nodes, 111 on tree, 322.129 best solution, best possible 22.3482 (12.70 seconds) Cbc0010I After 3700 nodes, 129 on tree, 322.129 best solution, best possible 22.3482 (13.12 seconds) OA0003I New best feasible of 148.62 found after 13.1848 sec. Cbc0012I Integer solution of 148.62 found by noonlinear programm after 62644 iterations and 3707 nodes (13.18 seconds) Cbc0010I After 3800 nodes, 104 on tree, 148.62 best solution, best possible 22.3482 (13.68 seconds) Cbc0010I After 3900 nodes, 124 on tree, 148.62 best solution, best possible 22.3482 (14.17 seconds) Cbc0010I After 4000 nodes, 144 on tree, 148.62 best solution, best possible 22.3482 (14.65 seconds) Cbc0010I After 4100 nodes, 164 on tree, 148.62 best solution, best possible 22.3482 (15.12 seconds) Cbc0010I After 4200 nodes, 174 on tree, 148.62 best solution, best possible 22.3482 (15.51 seconds) Cbc0010I After 4300 nodes, 203 on tree, 148.62 best solution, best possible 22.3482 (16.08 seconds) Cbc0010I After 4400 nodes, 209 on tree, 148.62 best solution, best possible 22.3482 (16.47 seconds) Cbc0010I After 4500 nodes, 242 on tree, 148.62 best solution, best possible 22.3482 (17.19 seconds) Cbc0010I After 4600 nodes, 260 on tree, 148.62 best solution, best possible 22.3482 (17.63 seconds) Cbc0010I After 4700 nodes, 283 on tree, 148.62 best solution, best possible 22.3482 (18.18 seconds) Cbc0010I After 4800 nodes, 301 on tree, 148.62 best solution, best possible 22.3482 (18.71 seconds) Cbc0010I After 4900 nodes, 313 on tree, 148.62 best solution, best possible 22.3482 (19.22 seconds) Cbc0010I After 5000 nodes, 330 on tree, 148.62 best solution, best possible 22.3482 (19.70 seconds) Cbc0010I After 5100 nodes, 344 on tree, 148.62 best solution, best possible 22.3482 (20.15 seconds) Cbc0010I After 5200 nodes, 367 on tree, 148.62 best solution, best possible 24 (20.73 seconds) Cbc0010I After 5300 nodes, 388 on tree, 148.62 best solution, best possible 24 (21.27 seconds) Cbc0010I After 5400 nodes, 399 on tree, 148.62 best solution, best possible 24 (21.86 seconds) Cbc0010I After 5500 nodes, 421 on tree, 148.62 best solution, best possible 24 (22.42 seconds) Cbc0010I After 5600 nodes, 437 on tree, 148.62 best solution, best possible 24 (22.88 seconds) Cbc0010I After 5700 nodes, 461 on tree, 148.62 best solution, best possible 24 (23.54 seconds) Cbc0010I After 5800 nodes, 478 on tree, 148.62 best solution, best possible 24 (24.03 seconds) Cbc0010I After 5900 nodes, 489 on tree, 148.62 best solution, best possible 24 (24.50 seconds) Cbc0010I After 6000 nodes, 502 on tree, 148.62 best solution, best possible 24 (24.93 seconds) Cbc0010I After 6100 nodes, 512 on tree, 148.62 best solution, best possible 24 (25.32 seconds) Cbc0010I After 6200 nodes, 517 on tree, 148.62 best solution, best possible 24 (25.69 seconds) Cbc0010I After 6300 nodes, 527 on tree, 148.62 best solution, best possible 24 (26.05 seconds) Cbc0010I After 6400 nodes, 533 on tree, 148.62 best solution, best possible 24 (26.42 seconds) OA0003I New best feasible of 130.46 found after 26.6017 sec. Cbc0012I Integer solution of 130.46 found by noonlinear programm after 136839 iterations and 6437 nodes (26.60 seconds) Cbc0010I After 6500 nodes, 448 on tree, 130.46 best solution, best possible 27.5072 (27.13 seconds) Cbc0010I After 6600 nodes, 474 on tree, 130.46 best solution, best possible 27.5072 (27.89 seconds) Cbc0010I After 6700 nodes, 501 on tree, 130.46 best solution, best possible 39.717 (28.50 seconds) Cbc0010I After 6800 nodes, 512 on tree, 130.46 best solution, best possible 39.717 (28.91 seconds) Cbc0010I After 6900 nodes, 539 on tree, 130.46 best solution, best possible 40.8 (29.40 seconds) Cbc0010I After 7000 nodes, 565 on tree, 130.46 best solution, best possible 40.8 (30.03 seconds) Cbc0010I After 7100 nodes, 585 on tree, 130.46 best solution, best possible 40.8 (30.53 seconds) Cbc0010I After 7200 nodes, 593 on tree, 130.46 best solution, best possible 40.8 (30.96 seconds) Cbc0010I After 7300 nodes, 609 on tree, 130.46 best solution, best possible 40.8 (31.41 seconds) Cbc0010I After 7400 nodes, 634 on tree, 130.46 best solution, best possible 40.8 (31.99 seconds) Cbc0010I After 7500 nodes, 638 on tree, 130.46 best solution, best possible 40.8 (32.40 seconds) Cbc0010I After 7600 nodes, 657 on tree, 130.46 best solution, best possible 40.8 (32.92 seconds) Cbc0010I After 7700 nodes, 665 on tree, 130.46 best solution, best possible 40.8 (33.29 seconds) Cbc0010I After 7800 nodes, 670 on tree, 130.46 best solution, best possible 40.8 (33.67 seconds) Cbc0010I After 7900 nodes, 678 on tree, 130.46 best solution, best possible 40.8 (34.04 seconds) Cbc0010I After 8000 nodes, 670 on tree, 130.46 best solution, best possible 40.8 (34.38 seconds) Cbc0010I After 8100 nodes, 680 on tree, 130.46 best solution, best possible 40.8 (34.81 seconds) Cbc0010I After 8200 nodes, 684 on tree, 130.46 best solution, best possible 40.8 (35.28 seconds) Cbc0010I After 8300 nodes, 695 on tree, 130.46 best solution, best possible 40.8 (35.69 seconds) Cbc0010I After 8400 nodes, 697 on tree, 130.46 best solution, best possible 40.8 (36.05 seconds) Cbc0010I After 8500 nodes, 697 on tree, 130.46 best solution, best possible 40.8 (36.46 seconds) Cbc0010I After 8600 nodes, 700 on tree, 130.46 best solution, best possible 40.8 (36.87 seconds) Cbc0010I After 8700 nodes, 703 on tree, 130.46 best solution, best possible 40.8 (37.41 seconds) Cbc0010I After 8800 nodes, 709 on tree, 130.46 best solution, best possible 40.8 (37.86 seconds) Cbc0010I After 8900 nodes, 724 on tree, 130.46 best solution, best possible 51.2202 (38.25 seconds) Cbc0010I After 9000 nodes, 725 on tree, 130.46 best solution, best possible 51.2202 (38.60 seconds) Cbc0010I After 9100 nodes, 728 on tree, 130.46 best solution, best possible 51.2202 (38.92 seconds) Cbc0010I After 9200 nodes, 730 on tree, 130.46 best solution, best possible 51.2202 (39.36 seconds) Cbc0010I After 9300 nodes, 750 on tree, 130.46 best solution, best possible 51.2202 (39.77 seconds) OA0003I New best feasible of 118.757 found after 39.9665 sec. Cbc0012I Integer solution of 118.757 found by noonlinear programm after 209092 iterations and 9341 nodes (39.96 seconds) OA0003I New best feasible of 106.757 found after 40.0905 sec. Cbc0012I Integer solution of 106.757 found by noonlinear programm after 209398 iterations and 9376 nodes (40.10 seconds) Cbc0010I After 9400 nodes, 404 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 51.2202 (40.27 seconds) Cbc0010I After 9500 nodes, 422 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 51.2202 (40.75 seconds) Cbc0010I After 9600 nodes, 434 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 51.2202 (41.34 seconds) Cbc0010I After 9700 nodes, 448 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 51.2202 (41.87 seconds) Cbc0010I After 9800 nodes, 459 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 51.2202 (42.32 seconds) Cbc0010I After 9900 nodes, 467 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 51.2202 (42.73 seconds) Cbc0010I After 10000 nodes, 466 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 51.2202 (43.05 seconds) Cbc0010I After 10100 nodes, 472 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 51.2202 (43.41 seconds) Cbc0010I After 10200 nodes, 476 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 51.2202 (43.77 seconds) Cbc0010I After 10300 nodes, 470 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 51.2202 (44.07 seconds) Cbc0010I After 10400 nodes, 479 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 51.2202 (44.59 seconds) Cbc0010I After 10500 nodes, 481 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 51.2202 (45.04 seconds) Cbc0010I After 10600 nodes, 505 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 54.1007 (45.65 seconds) Cbc0010I After 10700 nodes, 505 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 54.1007 (46.10 seconds) Cbc0010I After 10800 nodes, 504 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 54.1007 (46.46 seconds) Cbc0010I After 10900 nodes, 503 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 54.1007 (46.90 seconds) Cbc0010I After 11000 nodes, 510 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 54.1007 (47.37 seconds) Cbc0010I After 11100 nodes, 554 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 67.045 (48.04 seconds) Cbc0010I After 11200 nodes, 583 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 73.2648 (48.74 seconds) Cbc0010I After 11300 nodes, 612 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 76.4178 (49.44 seconds) Cbc0010I After 11400 nodes, 646 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 78.2427 (50.08 seconds) Cbc0010I After 11500 nodes, 655 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 78.2427 (50.56 seconds) Cbc0010I After 11600 nodes, 662 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 78.4295 (51.06 seconds) Cbc0010I After 11700 nodes, 678 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 80.2094 (51.68 seconds) Cbc0010I After 11800 nodes, 681 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 81.6273 (52.16 seconds) Cbc0010I After 11900 nodes, 714 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 81.835 (52.67 seconds) Cbc0010I After 12000 nodes, 734 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 82.4667 (53.28 seconds) Cbc0010I After 12100 nodes, 741 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 83.4876 (53.79 seconds) Cbc0010I After 12200 nodes, 748 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 83.6394 (54.30 seconds) Cbc0010I After 12300 nodes, 750 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 85.1787 (54.80 seconds) Cbc0010I After 12400 nodes, 760 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 85.765 (55.35 seconds) Cbc0010I After 12500 nodes, 770 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 85.7994 (55.96 seconds) Cbc0010I After 12600 nodes, 781 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 86.083 (56.54 seconds) Cbc0010I After 12700 nodes, 797 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 87.2054 (57.04 seconds) Cbc0010I After 12800 nodes, 794 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 87.8529 (57.56 seconds) Cbc0010I After 12900 nodes, 811 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 88.8665 (58.15 seconds) Cbc0010I After 13000 nodes, 817 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 89.2902 (58.75 seconds) Cbc0010I After 13100 nodes, 812 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 89.2902 (59.06 seconds) Cbc0010I After 13200 nodes, 802 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 89.2902 (59.39 seconds) Cbc0010I After 13300 nodes, 798 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 89.2902 (59.70 seconds) Cbc0010I After 13400 nodes, 797 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 89.2902 (60.11 seconds) Cbc0010I After 13500 nodes, 792 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 89.2902 (60.43 seconds) Cbc0010I After 13600 nodes, 788 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 89.2902 (60.78 seconds) Cbc0010I After 13700 nodes, 790 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 89.2902 (61.14 seconds) Cbc0010I After 13800 nodes, 788 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 89.2902 (61.56 seconds) Cbc0010I After 13900 nodes, 790 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 89.2902 (61.97 seconds) Cbc0010I After 14000 nodes, 787 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 89.2902 (62.33 seconds) Cbc0010I After 14100 nodes, 803 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 89.7864 (62.86 seconds) Cbc0010I After 14200 nodes, 807 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 90.3836 (63.46 seconds) Cbc0010I After 14300 nodes, 819 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 90.8589 (63.98 seconds) Cbc0010I After 14400 nodes, 837 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 91.0443 (64.46 seconds) Cbc0010I After 14500 nodes, 857 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 91.0443 (64.96 seconds) Cbc0010I After 14600 nodes, 882 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 91.0443 (65.44 seconds) Cbc0010I After 14700 nodes, 889 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 91.0443 (65.91 seconds) Cbc0010I After 14800 nodes, 887 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 91.4988 (66.32 seconds) Cbc0010I After 14900 nodes, 888 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 92.2243 (66.81 seconds) Cbc0010I After 15000 nodes, 912 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 92.2243 (67.42 seconds) Cbc0010I After 15100 nodes, 917 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 92.815 (67.88 seconds) Cbc0010I After 15200 nodes, 934 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 92.9787 (68.34 seconds) Cbc0010I After 15300 nodes, 947 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 93.0857 (69.02 seconds) Cbc0010I After 15400 nodes, 961 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 93.4981 (69.64 seconds) Cbc0010I After 15500 nodes, 970 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 93.8753 (70.16 seconds) Cbc0010I After 15600 nodes, 981 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 94.3161 (70.61 seconds) Cbc0010I After 15700 nodes, 987 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 94.4952 (71.02 seconds) Cbc0010I After 15800 nodes, 1005 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 94.6443 (71.48 seconds) Cbc0010I After 15900 nodes, 1008 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 94.9328 (71.96 seconds) Cbc0010I After 16000 nodes, 1008 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 95.4717 (72.36 seconds) Cbc0010I After 16100 nodes, 1016 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 95.9285 (72.88 seconds) Cbc0010I After 16200 nodes, 1029 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 96.022 (73.34 seconds) Cbc0010I After 16300 nodes, 1021 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 96.1304 (73.74 seconds) Cbc0010I After 16400 nodes, 1024 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 96.3047 (74.20 seconds) Cbc0010I After 16500 nodes, 1012 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 96.5489 (74.65 seconds) Cbc0010I After 16600 nodes, 992 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 96.9398 (75.06 seconds) Cbc0010I After 16700 nodes, 978 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 97.1577 (75.42 seconds) Cbc0010I After 16800 nodes, 994 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 97.2753 (75.91 seconds) Cbc0010I After 16900 nodes, 982 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 97.3357 (76.29 seconds) Cbc0010I After 17000 nodes, 983 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 97.4692 (76.78 seconds) Cbc0010I After 17100 nodes, 969 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 97.4692 (77.10 seconds) Cbc0010I After 17200 nodes, 963 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 97.4692 (77.40 seconds) Cbc0010I After 17300 nodes, 951 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 97.4692 (77.77 seconds) Cbc0010I After 17400 nodes, 939 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 97.4692 (78.07 seconds) Cbc0010I After 17500 nodes, 932 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 97.4692 (78.38 seconds) Cbc0010I After 17600 nodes, 923 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 97.4692 (78.72 seconds) Cbc0010I After 17700 nodes, 914 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 97.4692 (79.03 seconds) Cbc0010I After 17800 nodes, 909 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 97.4692 (79.38 seconds) Cbc0010I After 17900 nodes, 900 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 97.4692 (79.70 seconds) Cbc0010I After 18000 nodes, 890 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 97.4692 (80.01 seconds) Cbc0010I After 18100 nodes, 909 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 97.4692 (80.48 seconds) Cbc0010I After 18200 nodes, 921 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 97.4692 (80.87 seconds) Cbc0010I After 18300 nodes, 919 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 97.5502 (81.24 seconds) Cbc0010I After 18400 nodes, 914 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 97.8421 (81.65 seconds) Cbc0010I After 18500 nodes, 920 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 97.9078 (82.04 seconds) Cbc0010I After 18600 nodes, 931 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 97.9078 (82.42 seconds) Cbc0010I After 18700 nodes, 955 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 97.9539 (83.01 seconds) Cbc0010I After 18800 nodes, 951 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 98.0969 (83.53 seconds) Cbc0010I After 18900 nodes, 955 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 98.2346 (83.97 seconds) Cbc0010I After 19000 nodes, 966 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 98.2346 (84.49 seconds) Cbc0010I After 19100 nodes, 977 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 98.2346 (85.03 seconds) Cbc0010I After 19200 nodes, 980 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 98.272 (85.59 seconds) Cbc0010I After 19300 nodes, 980 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 98.4302 (85.99 seconds) Cbc0010I After 19400 nodes, 976 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 98.7314 (86.39 seconds) Cbc0010I After 19500 nodes, 962 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 98.9483 (86.81 seconds) Cbc0010I After 19600 nodes, 950 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 99.0994 (87.22 seconds) Cbc0010I After 19700 nodes, 955 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 99.262 (87.72 seconds) Cbc0010I After 19800 nodes, 933 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 99.496 (88.09 seconds) Cbc0010I After 19900 nodes, 916 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 99.7043 (88.50 seconds) Cbc0010I After 20000 nodes, 918 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 99.75 (88.94 seconds) Cbc0010I After 20100 nodes, 919 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 99.8977 (89.37 seconds) Cbc0010I After 20200 nodes, 914 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 100.04 (89.74 seconds) Cbc0010I After 20300 nodes, 908 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 100.298 (90.13 seconds) Cbc0010I After 20400 nodes, 904 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 100.4 (90.47 seconds) Cbc0010I After 20500 nodes, 903 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 100.487 (90.91 seconds) Cbc0010I After 20600 nodes, 902 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 100.628 (91.34 seconds) Cbc0010I After 20700 nodes, 883 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 100.823 (91.70 seconds) Cbc0010I After 20800 nodes, 872 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 101.055 (92.05 seconds) Cbc0010I After 20900 nodes, 869 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 101.294 (92.41 seconds) Cbc0010I After 21000 nodes, 854 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 101.481 (92.79 seconds) Cbc0010I After 21100 nodes, 834 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 101.481 (93.06 seconds) Cbc0010I After 21200 nodes, 816 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 101.481 (93.33 seconds) Cbc0010I After 21300 nodes, 798 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 101.481 (93.61 seconds) Cbc0010I After 21400 nodes, 786 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 101.481 (93.96 seconds) Cbc0010I After 21500 nodes, 778 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 101.481 (94.26 seconds) Cbc0010I After 21600 nodes, 776 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 101.481 (94.60 seconds) Cbc0010I After 21700 nodes, 769 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 101.481 (94.92 seconds) Cbc0010I After 21800 nodes, 758 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 101.481 (95.23 seconds) Cbc0010I After 21900 nodes, 755 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 101.481 (95.55 seconds) Cbc0010I After 22000 nodes, 748 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 101.481 (95.85 seconds) Cbc0010I After 22100 nodes, 745 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 101.584 (96.21 seconds) Cbc0010I After 22200 nodes, 741 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 101.629 (96.53 seconds) Cbc0010I After 22300 nodes, 737 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 101.887 (96.89 seconds) Cbc0010I After 22400 nodes, 727 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 102.031 (97.37 seconds) Cbc0010I After 22500 nodes, 725 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 102.346 (97.79 seconds) Cbc0010I After 22600 nodes, 720 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 102.543 (98.23 seconds) Cbc0010I After 22700 nodes, 708 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 102.727 (98.66 seconds) Cbc0010I After 22800 nodes, 709 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 102.785 (99.06 seconds) Cbc0010I After 22900 nodes, 711 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 102.872 (99.47 seconds) Cbc0010I After 23000 nodes, 705 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 103.003 (99.83 seconds) Cbc0010I After 23100 nodes, 703 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 103.223 (100.25 seconds) Cbc0010I After 23200 nodes, 694 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 103.327 (100.64 seconds) Cbc0010I After 23300 nodes, 693 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 103.342 (101.02 seconds) Cbc0010I After 23400 nodes, 701 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 103.349 (101.43 seconds) Cbc0010I After 23500 nodes, 693 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 103.48 (101.78 seconds) Cbc0010I After 23600 nodes, 714 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 103.48 (102.31 seconds) Cbc0010I After 23700 nodes, 720 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 103.48 (102.73 seconds) Cbc0010I After 23800 nodes, 718 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 103.48 (103.14 seconds) Cbc0010I After 23900 nodes, 723 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 103.564 (103.54 seconds) Cbc0010I After 24000 nodes, 708 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 103.674 (103.89 seconds) Cbc0010I After 24100 nodes, 705 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 103.728 (104.29 seconds) Cbc0010I After 24200 nodes, 698 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 103.753 (104.63 seconds) Cbc0010I After 24300 nodes, 680 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 103.894 (105.01 seconds) Cbc0010I After 24400 nodes, 658 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 103.944 (105.34 seconds) Cbc0010I After 24500 nodes, 647 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 104.005 (105.66 seconds) Cbc0010I After 24600 nodes, 645 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 104.031 (106.00 seconds) Cbc0010I After 24700 nodes, 634 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 104.092 (106.30 seconds) Cbc0010I After 24800 nodes, 629 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 104.106 (106.63 seconds) Cbc0010I After 24900 nodes, 619 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 104.106 (106.92 seconds) Cbc0010I After 25000 nodes, 602 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 104.169 (107.28 seconds) Cbc0010I After 25100 nodes, 580 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 104.169 (107.53 seconds) Cbc0010I After 25200 nodes, 560 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 104.169 (107.80 seconds) Cbc0010I After 25300 nodes, 550 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 104.169 (108.08 seconds) Cbc0010I After 25400 nodes, 537 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 104.169 (108.40 seconds) Cbc0010I After 25500 nodes, 525 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 104.169 (108.71 seconds) Cbc0010I After 25600 nodes, 509 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 104.169 (109.00 seconds) Cbc0010I After 25700 nodes, 504 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 104.169 (109.30 seconds) Cbc0010I After 25800 nodes, 490 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 104.169 (109.61 seconds) Cbc0010I After 25900 nodes, 478 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 104.169 (109.89 seconds) Cbc0010I After 26000 nodes, 467 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 104.169 (110.30 seconds) Cbc0010I After 26100 nodes, 458 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 104.257 (110.69 seconds) Cbc0010I After 26200 nodes, 464 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 104.378 (111.17 seconds) Cbc0010I After 26300 nodes, 459 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 104.51 (111.60 seconds) Cbc0010I After 26400 nodes, 457 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 104.51 (112.12 seconds) Cbc0010I After 26500 nodes, 442 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 104.51 (112.58 seconds) Cbc0010I After 26600 nodes, 420 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 104.619 (112.94 seconds) Cbc0010I After 26700 nodes, 409 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 104.732 (113.28 seconds) Cbc0010I After 26800 nodes, 383 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 104.967 (113.60 seconds) Cbc0010I After 26900 nodes, 375 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 105.036 (113.94 seconds) Cbc0010I After 27000 nodes, 360 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 105.107 (114.38 seconds) Cbc0010I After 27100 nodes, 356 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 105.107 (114.78 seconds) Cbc0010I After 27200 nodes, 354 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 105.107 (115.31 seconds) Cbc0010I After 27300 nodes, 323 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 105.185 (115.75 seconds) Cbc0010I After 27400 nodes, 322 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 105.26 (116.15 seconds) Cbc0010I After 27500 nodes, 299 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 105.433 (116.47 seconds) Cbc0010I After 27600 nodes, 295 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 105.444 (116.83 seconds) Cbc0010I After 27700 nodes, 298 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 105.444 (117.22 seconds) Cbc0010I After 27800 nodes, 293 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 105.444 (117.58 seconds) Cbc0010I After 27900 nodes, 290 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 105.444 (117.95 seconds) Cbc0010I After 28000 nodes, 289 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 105.444 (118.29 seconds) Cbc0010I After 28100 nodes, 280 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 105.458 (118.60 seconds) Cbc0010I After 28200 nodes, 271 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 105.482 (118.91 seconds) Cbc0010I After 28300 nodes, 267 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 105.575 (119.30 seconds) Cbc0010I After 28400 nodes, 256 on tree, 106.757 best solution, best possible 105.717 (119.68 seconds) Cbc0011I Exiting as integer gap of 1.03963 less than 0 or 1% Cbc0001I Search completed - best objective 106.7568769143963, took 644508 iterations and 28401 nodes (119.70 seconds) Cbc0032I Strong branching done 636 times (14523 iterations), fathomed 0 nodes and fixed 0 variables Cbc0035I Maximum depth 36, 0 variables fixed on reduced cost Mixed Integer Gomory was tried 3774 times and created 36010 cuts of which 13749 were active after adding rounds of cuts Probing was tried 15610 times and created 125 cuts of which 26 were active after adding rounds of cuts Outer Approximation feasibility check. was tried 9 times and created 154 cuts of which 0 were active after adding rounds of cuts Bonmin finished. Found feasible point. Objective function = 106.756877. Resolve with fixed discrete variables to get dual values. MINLP solution: 106.7568769 (28401 nodes, 119.73 seconds) Best possible: 106.7568769 Absolute gap: 3.6948e-13 Relative gap: 3.461e-15 GAMS/Bonmin finished. --- Restarting execution --- m7.gms(508) 0 Mb --- Reading solution for model m *** Status: Normal completion --- Job m7.gms Stop 09/06/08 15:05:50 elapsed 0:02:01.779